Vibrational properties of inclusion complexes: the case ofindomethacin-cyclodextrinCyclodextrins (CD) are a family of cyclicmolecules, consisting of six (α-CD), seven (β-CD) oreight (γ-CD) glucopyranose units which, in water,take on the peculiar 3-<strong>di</strong>mensional structure of atruncated cone, with a slightly soluble outer surfaceand a hydrophobic central cavity. A remarkableproperty of CD in aqueous solution, is their ability toform host-guest inclusion complexes with a widevariety of organic and inorganic molecules, providedthat the guest molecule is less polar than water. Inparticular, inclusion complexes of CD with non-polardrugs are a topic of current interest, because thesenon-covalent complexes increase the aqueoussolubility of drugs and also their chemical stabilityand bioavailability.Among the non-steroidal anti-inflammatorydrugs, indomethacin (IMC) is widely used as ananalgesic drug in the treatment of rheumatoidarthritis, as well as in other degenerative joint<strong>di</strong>seases, and recently it has also shown anti-tumouractivity. Nevertheless, due to its chemical structure,IMC is poorly soluble in water and this reduces itstherapeutic applications. A strategy to affect itssolubility and chemical stability in water, which isactually employed in commercial drugs, consists inthe preparation of inclusion complexes with CD.In a recent paper [1] we <strong>di</strong>scuss the resultsof Raman scattering experiments and numericsimulations on the IMC-CD inclusion complexes insolid state, which provide new insight into thestructure of the complexes, and into the effect of theinclusion process on the guest. Inclusion complexesof IMC with hydroxypropylβCD (IMC-HPβCD) andCD (IMC-βCD) have been prepared and preliminaryexperiments have been performed on the sampleusing electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry andNMR, in order to verify the effective formation of thecomplexes and their stoichiometry.also confirmed by the vibrational analysis performedby ab initio quantum chemical computation. Bycomparing the spectrum of free IMC (Fig.1 (a)) tothose of its inclusion complexes IMC-HPβCD (Fig.1(b)) and IMC-βCD (Fig.1 (c)), we note a markedbroadening of the peak correspon<strong>di</strong>ng to the amideC=O stretch, as well as a shift from ≈ 1700 cm -1 to ≈1670 cm -1 .From the above results one might infer thatit is the amide C=O group of IMC (and theneighbouring atoms) to be most affected by theinclusion process; similar results have been obtainedalso on the inclusion complex formed by βCD withIMC so<strong>di</strong>um salt. Moreover, in order to understandthe precise way in which such atoms are influencedby complexation, other possible effects should be<strong>di</strong>scussed, such as the possibility that the changes ofvibrational frequencies be due to the presence of theuncomplexed guest in <strong>di</strong>mer form. However, all theexperimental results in<strong>di</strong>cate that the observed shiftof the amide C=O stretch is actually related tocomplexation and not to the cleavage of hydrogenbon<strong>di</strong>ng patterns of IMC <strong>di</strong>mers.Experimental results are in qualitativeagreement with the conclusion of simulation, asshown in Figure 2., where the effect of thecomplexation on the computed g(ω) is reported. Wenote that here the shift to lower energy of theeigenvalue at 1628 cm -1 (correspon<strong>di</strong>ng in thesimulation to the amide C=O stretch of IMC) is wellreproduced.g(ω)1628 cm -1free IMCfree βCDIMC-βCD complex1614 cm -11620 1650 1680Energy (cm -1 )Fig. 2 Calculated g(ω) for free IMC (full line), freeβCD (empty circles) and for IMC-βCD inclusioncomplex (dotted line)Fig. 1 Raman spectra of free IMC (a), IMC-HPβCDcomplex (b) and IMC-βCD complex (c).By comparing the Raman spectrum of freeIMC with that of other molecules which havechemical structure very similar to subunits of IMC,we have assigned the peak of the guest at 1698 cm -1to the amide C=O stretch. This assignment has beenReferences[1] B. Rossi, P. Verrocchio, G. Viliani, G. Scarduelli,G. Guella, I. Mancini, J. Chem. Phys. 125 044511(2006).Authors: B. Rossi (a,b), P. Verrocchio (a,b), G.Viliani (a,b), G. Scarduelli (a), G. Guella (a), I.Mancini (a) - (a) <strong>Dipartimento</strong> <strong>di</strong> <strong>Fisica</strong> Università <strong>di</strong>Trento, Italy; (b) INFM CRS-SOFT, c/o Università <strong>di</strong>Roma "La <strong>Sapienza</strong>", Roma, Italy77SOFT Scientific <strong>Report</strong> 2004-06
Scientific <strong>Report</strong> – Non Equilibrium Dynamics and ComplexityTemperature-dependent vibrational heterogeneitiesin harmonic glassesThe question as to whether the structure of glassesat the scale of tens to hundreds of interatomic<strong>di</strong>stances is homogeneous or inhomogeneous, hasattracted recently much interest. Tra<strong>di</strong>tionally,following the continuous random network modelsuggested by Zachariasen, the homogeneoushypothesis has prevailed, also because noheterogeneity was clearly observed by small-angleneutron or X-ray scattering and electron microscopy.However, these techniques show only that there isno density heterogeneity, but tell nothing about thecohesion at the nano-metric scale, and cannot ruleout vibrational dynamical heterogeneities.Actually, recent molecular dynamics simulations onbinary Lennard-Jones (LJ) mixtures showed that inthe supercooled state highly mobile and immobileparticles exist, which are spatially correlated over arange that grows with temperature as the glasstransition is approached.the local force constants, motion in a given <strong>di</strong>rectionwill only occur if allowed by the excitable modes. Astemperature is increased and higher-energy modesbecome appreciably excited, the <strong>di</strong>splacementpatterns will be changed, and the same is expectedto happen to the characteristics of theheterogeneities.Our mono-atomic samples consisted of N 0 = 6980,2048, 1500, 1000, and 500 atoms, interactingthrough the LJ pair potential with parameters, massand density suitable for Argon. The soft (hard) atomshave been identified as those with small (large)variation of potential energy under the <strong>di</strong>splacementpattern produced by all (temperature-weighed)normal modes.The presence of vibrational heterogeneities isdetected by comparing the pair correlation functionof the whole system, g W(R), to that of the Nsoftest/hardest atoms, g N(R). An excess ofcorrelation in the peaks correspon<strong>di</strong>ng to nearestneighbours(nn) and next-nearest neighbours, i.e. g N> g W, in<strong>di</strong>cates the existence of heterogeneity. InFig. 1 we report the pair correlation functions of the2048-atom LJ system for various numbers of soft (a)and hard (b) atoms, at T = 03 in units of themaximum frequency. Clear <strong>di</strong>fferences appear in thefirst peak for both classes.One important question is whether with the presentsystem size it is possible to estimate the <strong>di</strong>mensionthat the dynamical heterogeneities would have in an"infinite" sample. To evaluate the size of theheterogeneities, we evaluated the ratio g N/g W; the<strong>di</strong>stance R 0 at which it stabilizes around 1, can beconsidered as an in<strong>di</strong>cation of the "ra<strong>di</strong>us" of theheterogeneity. The estimated size of heterogeneitiesdoes not depend very much on the sample size, andresults to be of the order of 7.5 ºA.Fig. 1 Pair correlation functions for N 0 = 2048(averaged over 3 samples). Top panels: <strong>di</strong>fferentnumber of soft (a) and hard (b) atoms, at ¯fixed T =0.3. Bottom panels: <strong>di</strong>fferent temperatures for the200 softest (c) and hardest (d) atoms.One important issue is whether or not suchheterogeneities are, in some sense, "frozen down"through the glass transition, so that even in the cold,harmonic glass, they leave a memory and, as aconsequence, softer and harder zones exist. In thepresent paper [1] we are concerned with two mainaspects of this problem: on the one hand we look forthe existence of dynamical heterogeneities in 3-<strong>di</strong>mensional harmonic LJ glasses, and investigatetheir size; on the other hand, we study the effect oftemperature. The latter is expected on the basis ofthe following argument. Consider a harmonic glass atlow temperature; in this case only the modes of lowfrequency will be excited and the atoms will onlyperform the cooperative motions correspon<strong>di</strong>ng tothese ; therefore, irrespective of the magnitude ofReferences[1] B. Rossi, G. Viliani, E. Duval, W. Garber,Europhysics Letters 71 256 (2005).Authors:B. Rossi (a,b), G. Viliani (a,b), E. Duval (c), W.Garber (d) - (a) <strong>Dipartimento</strong> <strong>di</strong> <strong>Fisica</strong> Università <strong>di</strong>Trento, Italy; (b) INFM CRS-SOFT, c/o Università <strong>di</strong>Roma "La <strong>Sapienza</strong>", Roma, Italy ; (c) LPCML, UMR-CNRS 5620, Université Lyon I, 69622 VilleurbanneCedex, France; (d) Department of AppliedMathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University,Stony Brook, New York 11794-3600, USASOFT Scientific <strong>Report</strong> 2004-0678
- Page 4 and 5:
Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica de
- Page 6 and 7:
ContentsIntroduction 7Scientific Mi
- Page 8 and 9:
IntroductionSOFT is a CRS (Centro d
- Page 10 and 11:
Scientific MissionThe scientific wo
- Page 13 and 14:
Missioncolloids and soft colloidal
- Page 15 and 16:
PersonnelManagement, Personnel and
- Page 17 and 18:
FacilitiesSOFT Scientific Report 20
- Page 19 and 20:
FacilitiesX-ray Diffraction Laborat
- Page 21 and 22:
FacilitiesThin Film Laboratory - Ud
- Page 23 and 24:
FacilitiesBrillouin Light Scatterin
- Page 25 and 26:
Facilitieslaserf 2BSf 1FOBSSoftware
- Page 27 and 28: FacilitiesStatic Light Scattering L
- Page 29 and 30: FacilitiesSpectroscopy Laboratory -
- Page 31 and 32: LSFSOFT Scientific Report 2004-0630
- Page 33 and 34: LSFFig. 1 - BRISP layoutBackground
- Page 35 and 36: LSFBRISP first spectraLeft panel: e
- Page 37 and 38: LSFNeutron guideMonochromator cryst
- Page 39 and 40: LSFAXES: Advanced X-ray Emission Sp
- Page 41 and 42: LSFID16: Inelastic X-ray Scattering
- Page 43 and 44: LSFExperiments at LSFYear 2004Elett
- Page 45 and 46: LSFYear 2005Elettra - IUVS• High
- Page 47 and 48: LSFYear 2006Elettra - IUVS• Study
- Page 49 and 50: Scientific ReportsScientific Report
- Page 51 and 52: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 53 and 54: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 55 and 56: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 57 and 58: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 59 and 60: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 61 and 62: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 63 and 64: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 65 and 66: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 67 and 68: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 69 and 70: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 71 and 72: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 73 and 74: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 75 and 76: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 77: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 81 and 82: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 83 and 84: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 85 and 86: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 87 and 88: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 89 and 90: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 91 and 92: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 93 and 94: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 95 and 96: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 97 and 98: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 99 and 100: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 101 and 102: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 103 and 104: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 105 and 106: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 107 and 108: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 109 and 110: Projects and CollaborationsSOFT Sci
- Page 111 and 112: Projects and CollaborationsPAIS 200
- Page 113 and 114: Projects and CollaborationsCollabor
- Page 115 and 116: DisseminationSOFT Scientific Report
- Page 117 and 118: DisseminationWe also point out the
- Page 119 and 120: DisseminationF. A. Gorelli, V. M. G
- Page 121 and 122: DisseminationL. Angelani, G. Foffi,
- Page 123 and 124: DisseminationC. Casieri, F. De Luca
- Page 125 and 126: DisseminationM. Finazzi, M. Portalu
- Page 127 and 128: DisseminationS. Magazu, F. Migliard
- Page 129 and 130:
DisseminationB. Rossi, G. Viliani,
- Page 131 and 132:
DisseminationE. Zaccarelli, C. Maye
- Page 133 and 134:
DisseminationV. Bortolotti, M. Cama
- Page 135 and 136:
DisseminationC. De Michele, A. Scal
- Page 137 and 138:
DisseminationJ. Gutierrez, F. J. Be
- Page 139 and 140:
DisseminationA. Monaco, A. I. Chuma
- Page 141 and 142:
DisseminationM. Reale, M. A. De Lut
- Page 143 and 144:
DisseminationF. Bordi, C. Cametti,
- Page 145 and 146:
DisseminationSOFT Scientific Report
- Page 147 and 148:
DisseminationXII Liquid and Amorpho
- Page 149 and 150:
DisseminationConference on "new pro
- Page 151 and 152:
DisseminationX International worksh
- Page 153 and 154:
DisseminationXAFS13, 13 th Internat
- Page 155 and 156:
DisseminationOrganization of School
- Page 157 and 158:
DisseminationSoft Annual WorkshopsE
- Page 159 and 160:
DisseminationSoft WebSiteThe Web Si
- Page 161 and 162:
DisseminationContactsINFM-CNR Resar