Neutron inelastic scattering on liquid CD 4 : a fruitful probe ofthe dynamics in simple molecular liquidsThe limited experimental work devoted in theseyears to the determination of the dynamic propertiesof simple molecular liquids has nonetheless producedextremely interesting results concerning the<strong>di</strong>spersion law of collective excitations and the quite<strong>di</strong>fferent role of damping with changing the system[1]. Moreover, comparison with monatomic fluids canfurther enrich the accessible information on thegeneral dynamic behavior of these liquids. Ourrecent neutron investigation on liquiddeuteromethane (CD 4) allowed, in particular, forstimulating steps forward in the in<strong>di</strong>viduation of thebasic phenomena ruling the actual extension of thepropagation Q-range of collective excitations in<strong>di</strong>sparate mono- and polyatomic fluids [2].Remarkable <strong>di</strong>fferences between our results for CD 4and those for other molecular liquids as ammonia,carbon tetrachloride, and sulphur <strong>di</strong>oxide [1] werefound, pointing in particular at the strikingly <strong>di</strong>fferentvalues found for Q t*, i.e. the reduced wavevectortransfer threshold value at which modes wereobserved to cease propagation in these liquids(Q*=Q l, with l the mean free path). For instance,Q t* ~ 2 for the liquids of Ref. [1]. Differently, in CD 4Q t* ~ 6, as it can be deduced (with a mean free pathl ~ 0.4 nm for the CD 4 sample under consideration)from comparison of the Q-dependences of excitationfrequency and width (HWHM), both shown in Fig. 1.The results for CD 4, fairly supported also by asatisfactory agreement with MD simulations based onrealistic site-site interactions [2], show instead moremarked similarities with monatomic liquids as Ar andNe. Such resemblances are suggested both by thecomparisons wih Ar data shown in Fig. 1, and by thetypical Q t* values (of the order of 6) of liquid Ar andNe [3].This overall picture led us to in<strong>di</strong>viduate an empiricalrelation, approximately valid for all the liquidsmentioned here, between the Q t* values at whichmodes overdamping is observed to occur, and thebasic interaction and transport properties of thefluid. Such a relation is Q t* Γ* ≈ const., with Γ* thereduced sound damping coefficient defined byΓ* = (m/ε) 1/2 Γ / σ. Here ε and σ can be taken as theeffective Lennard-Jones parameters for the variousfluids, and Γ is defined, as usual, in terms of thermal<strong>di</strong>ffusivity, bulk and shear viscosities, and specificheats ratio [2,3]. For all the liquids we could findacceptable experimental dynamical data, we findQ t* Γ* ≈ 19 within 11%. Even smaller fluctuationsare obtained by omitting the bulk viscositycontribution, unavoidably deriving from approximateestimates. In such a case, thus referring only toshear viscosity experimental data, we findQ t* Γ shear* ≈ 15 within 7%.Thus, apparently contrasting dynamic behaviors turnall out to follow, as far as the propagation range ofexcitations is concerned, the above approximateempirical relation, which provides a first evidence ofthe important interplay between attractive forces anddamping mechanisms in determining the transitionto the non-propagating regime in a liquid. Such asemi-quantitative relation, if confirmed by more thanthe few test-cases available, can indeed provide areasonable tool to pre<strong>di</strong>ct the range whereexcitations in a liquid are expected to propagate.Nonetheless, a unified picture of the dynamics ofmono- and polyatomic fluids is still far from hand,especially when the Q-dependence of the modeswidth is analysed in <strong>di</strong>fferent systems.References[1] F. J. Bermejo et al., J. Chem. Phys. 95, 5387(1991); M. García-Hernández et al., J. Chem. Phys.96, 8477 (1992) ; F. Sette et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4136 (2000).[2] E. Guarini et al., Europhys. Lett. 72, 969 (2005).[3] A. A. van Well and L. A. de Graaf, Phys. Rev. A32, 2396 (1985).[4] U. Bafile et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2394 (1990).Fig. 1 Q-dependence of the frequency (top) andHWHM (bottom) of collective modes in liquid CD 4:experimental (circles) and MD (stars) results. Fullsquares are Argon data read off from Fig. 12(a) ofref. [3]. In both frames, the dotted and dash-dottedcurves are the full hydrodynamic solutions [4]calculated, respectively, for CD 4 and Ar.Authors:E. Guarini (a), F. Barocchi (a), G. Venturi (a), U.Bafile (b), F. Formisano (c), M. Sampoli (d).(a) CNR-INFM, <strong>Dipartimento</strong> <strong>di</strong> <strong>Fisica</strong> Firenze, CRS-<strong>Soft</strong>; (b) CNR-ISC Firenze; (c) CNR-INFM, OGGGrenoble, CRS <strong>Soft</strong>; (d) <strong>Dipartimento</strong> <strong>di</strong> EnergeticaFirenze, CRS-<strong>Soft</strong>103SOFT Scientific <strong>Report</strong> 2004-06
Scientific <strong>Report</strong> – Elastic and inelastic scattering of neutrons and X-raysThe Dynamics of Dilute H 2 Enabling New Calibration Methodsin Neutron SpectroscopyThe never fa<strong>di</strong>ng scientific interest in the simplestand most fascinating molecular system, fluid H 2, haslately been revived by the possibility of convertingthe knowledge of its dynamic response to slow andthermal neutrons into a powerful technique for datanormalization in inelastic neutron scatteringexperiments. This possibility was, until very recently,IH2 [arb. units]α0 ≈ 30’a)6 x 10-3 E f = 50 meV5θ = 2°4321E [meV]0-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10b)c)α1 = 40’MonochromatorCu(111)Monitorθ MSamplej-th cell:θ j , ∆Ω j , ε jSlitsα2 = α1θFilterα3 = 60’3 He DetectorAnalyzerCu(111)/PG(002)i-th cell:θ i , ∆Ω i , ε iFig. 1: a) Experimental setup; b) Neutron spectrumof <strong>di</strong>lute H 2 (blue dots) compared with semiclassical(green curve) and quantum (red curve) pre<strong>di</strong>ctions;c) The big BRISP detector inside its long vacuumchamberat the ILL, ideally sub<strong>di</strong>vided into a 2Darray of square detection cells (see text).θ Ahindered by the absence of an experimentalverification of available theoretical pre<strong>di</strong>ctions for theH 2 roto-translational neutron spectra in the <strong>di</strong>lute,room temperature, phase.A successful attempt to overcome this lack ofinformation, carefully testing the dynamical modelsagainst first neutron data for low-density H 2, wasrecently performed [1] by means of three-axisspectrometry (IN3 instrument at ILL), using theinstrumental configuration shown in Fig. 1 a). Thedynamic response of <strong>di</strong>lute hydrogen was measuredat two fixed final neutron energies, namely E f = 14.7and 50 meV, and rather low scattering angles, i.e. inthe most deman<strong>di</strong>ng cases for theoreticalmodelization and, at the same time, in the mostuseful con<strong>di</strong>tions for the setting up of a valuable andalternative method to the well-known vana<strong>di</strong>umcalibration technique in neutron spectroscopy, whichcan lose accuracy at low momentum transfers. Adetailed data analysis of the H 2 neutron spectra,along with implementation of both semiclassical andquantum calculations of the expected intramoleculardynamics [1], <strong>di</strong>stinctly showed the superiority of thequantum-mechanical models. An example is shownin Fig. 1 b). The agreement found between measuredand quantum-calculated spectra, makes H 2 aconvenient fluid reference sample, particularly suitedto small-angle experiments, and, more generally, toinvestigations where the similarity between thegeometrical configuration of a liquid sample insideacontainer and the employed normalization standar<strong>di</strong>s crucial.The hydrogen calibration technique becomes evenmore powerful in the case of two-<strong>di</strong>mensionaldetection at small angles, as for the new BRISPspectrometer [2]. The availability of a referencesample characterized by a broad energy spectrumlike H 2, and the detailed knowledge of its scatteringlaw for each (E 0, E f, θ)-triplet, E 0 and θ being theincident neutron energy and scattering angle, allowsfor an accurate “cell-by-cell” normalization ofexperimental intensities. In<strong>di</strong>vidual normalizationfactors, depen<strong>di</strong>ng on specific scattering angle θ,solid angle ∆Ω, and efficiency ε, can now be assignedto the sample intensities, for each E value and foreach detector element (see an example sub<strong>di</strong>visionin Fig. 1 c), with unprecedented accuracy.References[1] E. Guarini, A. Orecchini, F. Formisano, F.Demmel, C. Petrillo, F. Sacchetti, U. Bafile, and F.Barocchi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 7895(2005).[2] D. Aisa et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 544, 620(2005).AuthorsF. Barocchi, U. Bafile, F. Formisano, E. Guarini, A.Orecchini, C. Petrillo, F. Sacchetti,<strong>Dipartimento</strong> <strong>di</strong> <strong>Fisica</strong>, Università <strong>di</strong> Firenze CRS-SOFT, CNR IFAC, OGG Grenoble CRS-SOFT,<strong>Dipartimento</strong> <strong>di</strong> <strong>Fisica</strong>, Università <strong>di</strong> Perugia, CRS-SOFTSOFT Scientific <strong>Report</strong> 2004-06104
- Page 4 and 5:
Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica de
- Page 6 and 7:
ContentsIntroduction 7Scientific Mi
- Page 8 and 9:
IntroductionSOFT is a CRS (Centro d
- Page 10 and 11:
Scientific MissionThe scientific wo
- Page 13 and 14:
Missioncolloids and soft colloidal
- Page 15 and 16:
PersonnelManagement, Personnel and
- Page 17 and 18:
FacilitiesSOFT Scientific Report 20
- Page 19 and 20:
FacilitiesX-ray Diffraction Laborat
- Page 21 and 22:
FacilitiesThin Film Laboratory - Ud
- Page 23 and 24:
FacilitiesBrillouin Light Scatterin
- Page 25 and 26:
Facilitieslaserf 2BSf 1FOBSSoftware
- Page 27 and 28:
FacilitiesStatic Light Scattering L
- Page 29 and 30:
FacilitiesSpectroscopy Laboratory -
- Page 31 and 32:
LSFSOFT Scientific Report 2004-0630
- Page 33 and 34:
LSFFig. 1 - BRISP layoutBackground
- Page 35 and 36:
LSFBRISP first spectraLeft panel: e
- Page 37 and 38:
LSFNeutron guideMonochromator cryst
- Page 39 and 40:
LSFAXES: Advanced X-ray Emission Sp
- Page 41 and 42:
LSFID16: Inelastic X-ray Scattering
- Page 43 and 44:
LSFExperiments at LSFYear 2004Elett
- Page 45 and 46:
LSFYear 2005Elettra - IUVS• High
- Page 47 and 48:
LSFYear 2006Elettra - IUVS• Study
- Page 49 and 50:
Scientific ReportsScientific Report
- Page 51 and 52:
Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 53 and 54: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 55 and 56: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 57 and 58: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 59 and 60: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 61 and 62: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 63 and 64: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 65 and 66: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 67 and 68: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 69 and 70: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 71 and 72: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 73 and 74: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 75 and 76: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 77 and 78: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 79 and 80: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 81 and 82: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 83 and 84: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 85 and 86: Scientific Report - Non Equilibrium
- Page 87 and 88: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 89 and 90: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 91 and 92: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 93 and 94: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 95 and 96: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 97 and 98: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 99 and 100: Scientific Report - Self Assembly,
- Page 101 and 102: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 103: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 107 and 108: Scientific Report - Elastic and ine
- Page 109 and 110: Projects and CollaborationsSOFT Sci
- Page 111 and 112: Projects and CollaborationsPAIS 200
- Page 113 and 114: Projects and CollaborationsCollabor
- Page 115 and 116: DisseminationSOFT Scientific Report
- Page 117 and 118: DisseminationWe also point out the
- Page 119 and 120: DisseminationF. A. Gorelli, V. M. G
- Page 121 and 122: DisseminationL. Angelani, G. Foffi,
- Page 123 and 124: DisseminationC. Casieri, F. De Luca
- Page 125 and 126: DisseminationM. Finazzi, M. Portalu
- Page 127 and 128: DisseminationS. Magazu, F. Migliard
- Page 129 and 130: DisseminationB. Rossi, G. Viliani,
- Page 131 and 132: DisseminationE. Zaccarelli, C. Maye
- Page 133 and 134: DisseminationV. Bortolotti, M. Cama
- Page 135 and 136: DisseminationC. De Michele, A. Scal
- Page 137 and 138: DisseminationJ. Gutierrez, F. J. Be
- Page 139 and 140: DisseminationA. Monaco, A. I. Chuma
- Page 141 and 142: DisseminationM. Reale, M. A. De Lut
- Page 143 and 144: DisseminationF. Bordi, C. Cametti,
- Page 145 and 146: DisseminationSOFT Scientific Report
- Page 147 and 148: DisseminationXII Liquid and Amorpho
- Page 149 and 150: DisseminationConference on "new pro
- Page 151 and 152: DisseminationX International worksh
- Page 153 and 154: DisseminationXAFS13, 13 th Internat
- Page 155 and 156:
DisseminationOrganization of School
- Page 157 and 158:
DisseminationSoft Annual WorkshopsE
- Page 159 and 160:
DisseminationSoft WebSiteThe Web Si
- Page 161 and 162:
DisseminationContactsINFM-CNR Resar