03.12.2012 Views

Detailed Version - Volkswagen AG

Detailed Version - Volkswagen AG

Detailed Version - Volkswagen AG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Golf<br />

Environmental Commendation –<br />

<strong>Detailed</strong> <strong>Version</strong>


Inhalt<br />

Introduction 3<br />

Summary 4<br />

1 The Golf – a defining character 5<br />

2 Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product evaluation and optimisation 7<br />

2.1. Life Cycle Inventory – LCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8<br />

2.2. Life Cycle Impact Assessment – LCIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

2.3. Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

2.4. Implementation at <strong>Volkswagen</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

3 The Golf models assessed 12<br />

3.1. Aim and target group of the assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

3.2. Function and functional unit of the vehicle systems assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

3.3. Scope of assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />

3.4. Environmental impact assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15<br />

3.5 Basis of data and data quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16<br />

4 Model assumptions and findings of the Life Cycle Assessment 19<br />

5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment 21<br />

5.1. Material composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21<br />

5.2. Results of the Life Cycle Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22<br />

5.3. Comparison of Life Cycle Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />

5.4. Diesel vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />

5.4. Petrol vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31<br />

5.4. Differentiation of environmental impact caused by manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34<br />

6 Recycling end-of-life vehicles with the VW SiCon process 36<br />

7 We‘re driving mobility forward 40<br />

8 Conclusion 42<br />

9 Validation 43<br />

Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44<br />

Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46<br />

List of sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47<br />

List of figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48<br />

List of tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48<br />

Annex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49<br />

2


Introduction<br />

Introduction<br />

With 26 million units sold since 1974, the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> Golf is Europe‘s best-selling car.<br />

This success will be continued by the Golf VI thanks to high levels of safety, economy<br />

and innovations in driver comfort and environmental protection. As a high-volume<br />

carmaker, we are well aware of our responsibility for climate protection and the conservation<br />

of resources, and thus for sustainable mobility. For this reason, <strong>Volkswagen</strong><br />

has set itself the target of making each new model better than its predecessor in all<br />

relevant areas. This applies especially to environmental properties. The sixth-generation<br />

Golf meets these requirements in an exemplary way.<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> uses environmental commendations to document the environmental<br />

performance of its vehicles and technologies. Our first environmental commendations,<br />

for the Passat and the Golf V, were very well received both by the public and by the<br />

media. Our environmental commendations provide our customers, shareholders<br />

and other stakeholders inside and outside the company with detailed information<br />

about how we are making our products and production processes more environmentally<br />

compatible and what we have achieved in this respect.<br />

The environmental commendations are primarily based on the results of a Life Cycle<br />

Assessment (LCA) in accordance with ISO 14040/44, which has been verified by independent<br />

experts, in this case from TÜV NORD. As part of an integrated product policy,<br />

the LCA considers not only individual environmental aspects such as the driving<br />

emissions of a vehicle, but the entire product life cycle – from production and use,<br />

right through to disposal – in other words “from cradle to grave”.<br />

Here, too, <strong>Volkswagen</strong> has already established a tradition. We have been analysing<br />

our cars and their individual components since 1996, using Life Cycle Assessments to<br />

enhance their environmental compatibility. The environmental improvement of our<br />

best-selling model is an especially important step for us as we advance towards sustainable<br />

mobility. The environmental commendation for the Golf VI presents the<br />

comprehensive results of our Life Cycle Assessment and documents the continuous<br />

progress achieved by <strong>Volkswagen</strong> in the field of environmental product optimisation.<br />

3


Summary<br />

Summary<br />

For the Life Cycle Assessment of the Golf VI, we compared a petrol model with<br />

1.6-litre engine (75 kW) and 7-speed DSG dual-clutch gearbox with a predecessor<br />

model (Golf V 1.6 MPI, 75 kW) with manual gearbox. For the diesel models, a<br />

2.0-litre TDI developing 81 kW was compared with a similar predecessor model<br />

(Golf V 1.9 TDI, 77 kW). Both of the diesel models feature a diesel particulate filter<br />

(DPF) as standard equipment. The evaluation of the environmental profile is not<br />

solely based on emissions during a vehicle’s service life, but on the entire life<br />

cycle from production to disposal. As in the case of the Golf V, the latest models<br />

show improvements in all the environmental impact categories. The greatest<br />

advances have been made in the areas of global warming potential (greenhouse<br />

effect), acidification and photochemical ozone (summer smog) creation potential.<br />

In other respects, such as water and soil eutrophication and ozone depletion,<br />

the cars assessed have in any case very little impact. It emerged that these<br />

improvements were primarily due to reduced fuel consumption and the resultant<br />

drop in driving emissions and reduction in environmental impact at the fuel<br />

production stage. The reduction in fuel consumption, in turn, is the direct result<br />

of an extensive package of measures<br />

related to the engines (especially the<br />

turbocharged and mechanically<br />

supercharged direct injection petrol<br />

engines) and transmissions, as well as<br />

improvements in the areas of lightweight<br />

design, aerodynamic drag and<br />

rolling resistance and the energy consumption<br />

of electrical components.<br />

4<br />

A Life Cycle Assessment includes<br />

fuel production and vehicle<br />

production, the vehicle’s service<br />

life and recycling/disposal.


1 The Golf – a defining character<br />

The Golf – a defining character<br />

Over more than 30 years, <strong>Volkswagen</strong> has systematically perfected the Golf. From model<br />

to model, it has retained the good features of its predecessors at the same time as re-<br />

ceiving many improvements. A Golf always embodies the highest degree of innovation<br />

and quality, as well as safety and economy. In other words, the Golf is a symbol of the<br />

key values of <strong>Volkswagen</strong>.<br />

These values are crucial, but <strong>Volkswagen</strong> thinks even further: our goal is that every new<br />

vehicle, in addition to all its technical advantages that make a driver‘s life easier and<br />

safer, should have better environmental properties than its predecessor, viewed over<br />

the entire vehicle life cycle. The Technical Development department of the <strong>Volkswagen</strong><br />

brand has set itself environmental targets in the areas of healthcare, climate protection<br />

and resource conservation so that <strong>Volkswagen</strong> can shoulder its responsibilities towards<br />

customers, society and the environment.<br />

As raw materials are scarce and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are growing,<br />

There are two main factors that can contribute to reduced fuel consumption<br />

and carbon dioxide emissions – lighter weight and economical engines.<br />

However, Golf engines are already highly efficient and the effort required to reduce their<br />

fuel consumption, for example from 5 to 4.5 litres per 100 kilometres, is considerable –<br />

and becomes more so as fuel consumption decreases. Nevertheless, we have succeeded<br />

in making the engines available for the new Golf even more economical. We have<br />

achieved this mainly by using forced-induction engines, equipped with turbochargers<br />

and/or mechanical superchargers. Despite their small capacity, they develop a power<br />

output that could only have been reached by much larger engines just a few years ago.<br />

5


1 The Golf – a defining character<br />

As engines with lower displacement require less material, take up less space and also<br />

feature lower friction losses, they are lighter and call for less energy to produce the<br />

same power output. In short, these engines use fuel considerably more efficiently<br />

than normally aspirated engines with the same power output.<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong>‘s powerful but economical TDI diesel engines have been impressing the<br />

automobile world since the 1990s. Among other things, their record-breaking fuel<br />

economy is due to direct fuel injection. In combination with supercharging, this<br />

technology also makes modern petrol engines, such as <strong>Volkswagen</strong>‘s TSI units, very<br />

frugal. Thanks to supercharging and direct injection, TSI engines can develop more<br />

torque, especially at low engine speeds. The result is more comfortable driving and<br />

low fuel consumption at the same time as greater driving pleasure.<br />

In 2008, TSI technology received the Engine of the Year Award for the third year in<br />

succession. However, TDI and TSI power plants can only achieve their full savings<br />

potential in combination with the DSG ® dual-clutch gearbox developed by <strong>Volkswagen</strong>.<br />

This gearbox is not only more convenient to use; it also improves both performance<br />

and fuel economy. The new manual gearboxes also feature optimised<br />

transmission ratios that help reduce fuel consumption.<br />

All the engines offered for the Golf have emissions below the limits set by the Euro-5<br />

emissions standard (see Table 3, p. 16). Factors which help achieve these low emissions<br />

include a new generation of engine electronics and a modified coating for the main<br />

catalytic converter.<br />

There have also been significant improvements in acoustics and aerodynamics. The<br />

Golf has become perceptibly quieter. Engine, wind and rolling noise have all been<br />

reduced significantly by a variety of developments. For example, heavy acoustic<br />

insulation material has been consistently reduced where possible and replaced by<br />

lighter material. The engine and passenger compartments are now isolated from each<br />

other more effectively. Quieter tires and new engine mounts to decouple the engine<br />

from the body help reduce noise levels, as does the new common rail injection system<br />

that replaces the pump-injector system on the TDI. A special sound insulation film in<br />

the windscreen and newly developed seals for doors and side windows round off the<br />

noise reduction package. In addition, the wing mirrors have been redesigned to create<br />

less wind noise. They also contribute to improved aerodynamics: the product of the<br />

drag coefficient (Cd) and the cross sectional area (A) is only 0.69, lower than for any<br />

other Golf previously produced.<br />

6


2 Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product evaluation and optimisation<br />

Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product<br />

evaluation and optimisation<br />

The environmental goals of the Technical Development department of the <strong>Volkswagen</strong><br />

brand state that we develop our vehicles in such a way that, in their entirety, they present<br />

better environmental properties than their predecessors. By „in their entirety“, we<br />

mean that the entire product life cycle is considered, from cradle to grave.<br />

Fig 1: Environmental goals of the Technical Development department of the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> brand<br />

7


2 Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product evaluation and optimisation<br />

This environmental commendation considers the significance of all these technical<br />

developments for the environmental profile of the new Golf VI. The decisive factor for<br />

the environmental profile of a product is its impact on the environment during its<br />

entire „lifetime“. This means we do not focus solely on a car’s service life but also on<br />

the phases before and after, i.e. we draw up a balance sheet that includes the manufacturing,<br />

disposal and recycling processes. All life cycle phases require energy and<br />

resources, cause emissions and generate waste. Different vehicles and technologies<br />

can only be effectively compared on the basis of a balance sheet that covers all these<br />

individual processes from „cradle to grave“. And this is precisely what Life Cycle<br />

Assessments or LCAs facilitate. Our Life Cycle Assessments accurately and quantifiably<br />

describe the environmental impacts related to a product, for instance a car, and<br />

thus allow a more precise description of its environmental profile on the basis of comparable<br />

data. To ensure that the results of the Life Cycle Assessments meet exacting<br />

quality and comparability requirements, they are based on the standard series ISO<br />

14040 [14040 2006]. This specifically includes the verification of the results by an independent<br />

expert. In this case, a critical review was conducted by the TÜV NORD<br />

technical inspection agency.<br />

The first stage in preparing a Life Cycle Assessment is to draw up a precise definition<br />

of its objectives and the target groups it is intended to address. This definition clearly<br />

describes the systems to be evaluated in terms of the system function, the system limits 1<br />

and the functional unit 2 . The methods of environmental impact assessment, the en-<br />

vironmental impact categories considered, the evaluation methods and, if necessary,<br />

the allocation procedures3 are defined in accordance with ISO 14040. The individual<br />

steps involved in preparing a Life Cycle Assessment are described briefly below.<br />

Life Cycle Inventory – LCI<br />

In the Life Cycle Inventory, data is collected for all processes within the scope of the<br />

evaluation. Information on inputs such as raw materials and sources of energy and<br />

outputs, such as emissions and waste, is compiled for each process, always with reference<br />

to the defined scope of the evaluation (see Fig 2).<br />

Energy<br />

&<br />

Resources<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Recycling<br />

Fig 2: Input and output flows for a Life Cycle Inventory<br />

Production<br />

Utilisation<br />

Emissions<br />

&<br />

Waste<br />

1 By defining the system limits, the scope of the Life Cycle Assessment is restricted to those processes and material<br />

flows that need to be evaluated in order to achieve the defined goal of the study.<br />

2 The functional unit quantifies the benefit of the vehicle systems evaluated and further ensures their comparability.<br />

3 Where processes have several inputs and outputs, an allocation procedure is needed to assign flows arising from<br />

the product system under evaluation to the various inputs and outputs.<br />

8


2 Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product evaluation and optimisation<br />

The Life Cycle Inventory of an entire product life cycle includes numerous different<br />

inputs and outputs that are ultimately added up to prepare the inventory.<br />

Life Cycle Impact Assessment – LCIA<br />

A Life Cycle Inventory only quantifies the inputs and outputs of the system investiga-<br />

ted. The following step – impact assessment – allocates the appropriate environmental<br />

impacts to the respective material flows, allowing conclusions to be drawn concerning<br />

potential environmental impacts. This involves defining an indicator substance for<br />

each environmental impact category, for instance carbon dioxide (CO2) for the impact<br />

category „global warming potential“. Then all substances that also contribute to the<br />

global warming potential are converted to CO2 equivalents4 using equivalence factors.<br />

Product Life Cycle<br />

Manufactoring<br />

fuel and materials<br />

CO2 CH4 NOX ...<br />

Fig. 3: Procedure for impact assessment<br />

Production Utilisation Recycling<br />

CO2 VOC ... CO2 VOC NOX ... CO2 SO2 NOX ...<br />

Life Cycle Inventory<br />

NCH4 NVOC NCO2 NNOX N...<br />

Impact Assessment<br />

Global warming potential Photochemical ozone Acidification Eutrophication ...<br />

Standardisation<br />

of environmental impacts with average impact per inhabitant:<br />

How many inhabitants cause the same environmental impact as the product evaluated?<br />

Examples of environmental categories are global warming potential, photochemical<br />

ozone creation potential, acidification potential or eutrophication potential.<br />

Evaluation<br />

The subsequent final evaluation interprets and evaluates the results of the Life Cycle<br />

Inventory and the Life Cycle Impact Assessment. The evaluation is based on the defined<br />

goal and scope of the Life Cycle Assessment.<br />

4 Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the indicator substance for global warming potential. All substances that contribute to<br />

the greenhouse effect are converted into CO2 equivalents through an equivalence factor. For instance, the global<br />

warming potential of methane (CH4) is 23 times<br />

9


2 Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product evaluation and optimisation<br />

Implementation at <strong>Volkswagen</strong><br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> has many years of experience with Life Cycle Assessments for product and<br />

process optimisation. We have even assumed a leading role in implementing and publishing<br />

complete life cycle inventories of vehicles. For instance, in 1996 we were the<br />

first car manufacturer to prepare a Life Cycle Inventory study (for the Golf III) and<br />

publish it [Schweimer and Schuckert 1996]. Since then we have drawn up Life Cycle<br />

Assessments for other cars and also published some of the results [Schweimer 1998;<br />

Schweimer et al. 1999; Schweimer and Levin 2000; Schweimer and Roßberg 2001].<br />

These LCAs primarily describe and identify environmental „hot spots“ in the life cycle<br />

of a car. Since then we have broadened the assessments to include production processes<br />

as well as fuel production and recycling processes [Bossdorf-Zimmer et al. 2005;<br />

Krinke et al. 2005b]. Since 2007, we have used environmental commendations to inform<br />

customers about the environmental properties of our vehicles [<strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong><br />

2007a, <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong> 2007b].<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> is also making long-term investments in further developing and optimising<br />

Life Cycle Assessment methods. Thanks to our intensive research we have succeeded in<br />

considerably reducing the workload involved in preparing life cycle inventories.<br />

Our research resulted in the development of the VW slimLCI interface system [Koffler et<br />

al. 2007]: this interface not only significantly cuts the workload involved in preparing<br />

Life Cycle Assessments of complete vehicles by automating the process but also further<br />

improves the consistency and quality of the LCA models produced.<br />

This represents substantial progress, since preparing a complete LCA for a vehicle<br />

involves registering thousands of components, together with any related upstream<br />

supply chains and processes (see Fig. 4).<br />

Fig. 4: Dismantling study of the Golf V<br />

10


2 Life Cycle Assessments for ecological product evaluation and optimisation<br />

The fact that all the parts and components of a vehicle themselves consist of a variety<br />

of materials and are manufactured by many different processes – processes that in turn<br />

consume energy, consumables and fabricated materials – demonstrates the complexity<br />

of the modelling process. In addition, the correct assignment of manufacturing processes<br />

to materials calls for considerable expert knowledge, a large database and<br />

detailed information on production and processing steps. The VW slimLCI interface<br />

system allows these details to be modelled very precisely and sufficiently completely<br />

in Life Cycle Assessment models – even for entire vehicles. A Life Cycle Assessment or<br />

product model is based on the vehicle parts lists drawn up by the Technical Development<br />

department, as well as on material data drawn from the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong> Material<br />

Information System (MISS). The VW slimLCI interface system primarily consists of two<br />

interfaces that transfer the vehicle data from these systems to the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

software GaBi5 , using a defined operating sequence (algorithm). (see Fig. 5).<br />

slimLCI<br />

MISS<br />

Material Data Interface 1 Transfer file Interface 2 Product model<br />

Database<br />

Predefinied process<br />

Product<br />

parts list<br />

Manual<br />

consolidation<br />

Electronic data<br />

Manual process<br />

GaBi<br />

software<br />

Fig. 5: Process of modelling an entire vehicle with the VW slimLCI interface system<br />

Interface 1 helps assign information from parts lists (part designations and quantities) to<br />

the relevant component information (materials and weights) from MISS6 and converts it<br />

into a transfer file which is then quality-tested (manual consolidation). Interface 2 then<br />

allows the transfer file to be linked with the related data records in the GaBi Life Cycle<br />

Assessment software. For example, to each material, such as sheet metal, the interface<br />

allocates all the material production, moulding and subsequent treatment processes<br />

listed in the database. The model generated by GaBi therefore reflects all the processing<br />

stages in the manufacture of the entire vehicle being evaluated. So with the VW slimLCI<br />

interface system we can prepare Life Cycle Assessments in a very short time and use<br />

them continuously in order to keep pace with the steadily growing demand for environment-related<br />

product information.<br />

5 GaBi ® is a Life Cycle Assessment software package from PE international.<br />

6 MISS is a VW internal computer tool used to determine the material composition of a component.<br />

11


3 The Golf models assessed<br />

The Golf models assessed<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong>‘s environmental commendation for the Golf describes and analyses the<br />

environmental impacts of selected Golf models. We have compared diesel and petrolengined<br />

models from the current model range (Golf VI) with their predecessors (Golf V).<br />

The results are based on Life Cycle Assessments drawn up in accordance with the<br />

standards DIN EN ISO 14040 and 14044. All the definitions and descriptions required for<br />

preparing these Life Cycle Assessments were drawn up in accordance with the standards<br />

mentioned above and are explained below.<br />

Aim and target group of the assessment<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> has been producing Life Cycle Assessments for over ten years to provide<br />

detailed information on the environmental impacts of vehicles and components for<br />

our customers, shareholders<br />

and other<br />

interested parties<br />

within and outside<br />

the company. The<br />

aim of this Life Cycle<br />

Assessment is to describe<br />

the environmental<br />

profiles of the<br />

current Golf models<br />

with diesel and petrol<br />

engines and compare<br />

them with their predecessors.<br />

We compared<br />

the Golf V 1.9<br />

TDI7 with its successor,<br />

the Golf VI 2.0 TDI8 .<br />

Both these diesel models are equipped with a diesel particulate filter (DPF). The<br />

petrol-engined Golf V 1.6 MPI9 was compared with its successor, the Golf VI 1.6 MPI10 with seven-speed DSG ® dual-clutch gearbox11 .<br />

Function and functional unit of the vehicle systems assessed<br />

The “functional unit” for the assessment was defined as the transportation of passengers<br />

in a five-seater vehicle over a total distance of 150,000 kilometres in the New European<br />

Driving Cycle (NEDC) with comparable utilisation characteristics (such as performance<br />

and loading volume – see technical data in Table 1).<br />

7 5.1 l/100km (NEDC) 135g CO2/km<br />

8 4.5 l/100km (NEDC) 119g CO2/km<br />

9 7.4 l/100km (NEDC) 176g CO2/km<br />

10 6.7 l/100km (NEDC) 157g CO2/km<br />

11 In each case, the engine/transmission combination with the lowest fuel consumption was selected for the comparison. This was<br />

normally a model with manual gearbox. However, in the case of the Golf VI MPI, the model with 7-speed DSG gearbox has the<br />

lowest consumption. The greater comfort and convenience of the DSG gearbox was not taken into account in the assessment.<br />

12


Engine capacity [cm 3 ]<br />

3 The Golf models assessed<br />

Output [kW]<br />

Gearbox<br />

Fuel<br />

Emission standard<br />

Maximum speed [km/h]<br />

Acceleration 0-100 km/h [s]<br />

Max torque [Nm]<br />

DIN unladen weight [kg]<br />

Loading volume [l]<br />

Range [km]<br />

Acoustics [db(A)]<br />

(standing/driving noise)<br />

Golf V<br />

1.9 TDI DPF<br />

1896<br />

77<br />

5-speed manual<br />

Diesel<br />

Euro 4<br />

187<br />

11.3<br />

250 / 1900<br />

1251<br />

350 / 1305<br />

1078<br />

78 / 71<br />

Scope of assessment<br />

Golf V<br />

1.6 MPI<br />

The scope of the assessment was defined in such a way that all relevant processes and<br />

substances are considered, traced back to the furthest possible extent and modelled at<br />

the level of elementary flows in accordance with ISO 14040. This means that only substances<br />

and energy flows taken directly from the environment or released into the environment<br />

without prior or subsequent treatment exceed the scope of the assessment.<br />

The only exceptions to this rule are the material fractions formed in the recycling stage.<br />

The vehicle manufacturing phase was modelled including all manufacturing and<br />

processing stages for all vehicle parts and components. The model included all steps<br />

from the extraction of raw materials and the manufacture of semifinished products<br />

right through to assembly.<br />

As regards the vehicle’s service life, the model includes all relevant processes from<br />

fuel production and delivery through to actual driving. The analysis of the fuel supply<br />

process includes shipment from the oilfield to the refinery, the refining process and<br />

transportation from the refinery to the filling station. Vehicle maintenance is not included<br />

in the assessment as previous studies demonstrated that maintenance does<br />

not cause any significant environmental impacts [Schweimer and Levin, 2000].<br />

13<br />

Table 1: Technical data of vehicles assessed<br />

Golf VI<br />

2.0 TDI DPF<br />

1968<br />

81<br />

5-speed manual<br />

Diesel<br />

Euro 5<br />

194<br />

10.7<br />

250 / 1750<br />

1266<br />

350 / 1305<br />

1222<br />

75 / 71<br />

1595<br />

75<br />

5-speed manual<br />

petrol (Super)<br />

Euro 4<br />

184<br />

11.4<br />

148 / 3800<br />

1173<br />

350 / 1305<br />

743<br />

81 / 72<br />

Golf VI<br />

1.6 MPI with DSG ®<br />

1595<br />

75<br />

7-speed DSG<br />

petrol (Super)<br />

Euro 5<br />

188<br />

11.3<br />

148 / 3800<br />

1190<br />

350 / 1305<br />

820<br />

78 / 70


3 The Golf models assessed<br />

The recycling phase has been modelled in accordance with the VW SiCon process.<br />

In contrast to conventional recycling approaches, this process allows non-metallic<br />

shredder residue to also be recycled and used as a substitute for primary raw materials.<br />

Using the SiCon process, approximately 95 percent of a car by weight can be recycled.<br />

A more detailed description of the VW SiCon process is provided in Chapter 6.<br />

In this Life Cycle Assessment, no environmental credits were awarded for the secondary<br />

raw material obtained from the recycling process. We only included the environmental<br />

impacts of the recycling processes required. This corresponds to a worst case assumption12<br />

, since in reality secondary raw material from vehicle recycling is generally returned<br />

to the production cycle. This recycling and substitution of primary raw materials avoids<br />

the environmental impact of primary raw material production.<br />

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram indicating the scope of the Life Cycle Assessment. Europe<br />

(EU 15) was chosen as the reference area for all processes in the manufacture, service<br />

and recycling phases.<br />

Scope of assessment<br />

Production of raw material<br />

Production of materials<br />

Production of components<br />

Fig. 6: Scope of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Production pipeline<br />

Transport refining<br />

Transport filling station<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Manufacturing Maintenance Recycling<br />

Service life<br />

Recovery of energy<br />

and raw materials<br />

Credits<br />

12 Here the worst case is a set of most unfavourable model parameters of the recycling phase.<br />

14


3 The Golf models assessed<br />

Environmental impact assessment<br />

The impact assessment is based on a method developed by the University of Leiden<br />

in the Netherlands (CML methodology) [Guinée and Lindeijer 2002]. The assessment<br />

of environmental impact potentials in accordance with this method is based on recognised<br />

scientific models. A total of five environmental impact categories13 were<br />

identified as relevant and were then assessed in this study:<br />

• eutrophication potential<br />

• ozone depletion potential<br />

• photochemical ozone creation potential<br />

• global warming potential for a reference period of 100 years<br />

• acidification potential<br />

The above environmental impact categories were chosen because they are particularly<br />

important for the automotive sector, and are also regularly used in other automotiverelated<br />

Life Cycle Assessments [Schmidt et al. 2004; Krinke et al. 2005a]. The environmental<br />

impacts determined in the Life Cycle Assessments are measured in different<br />

units. For instance, the global warming potential is measured in CO2 equivalents and<br />

the acidification potential in SO2 equivalents (each in kilograms). In order to make them<br />

comparable, a standardisation process is necessary. In this Life Cycle Assessment the<br />

results were standardised with reference to the average environmental impact caused<br />

by an inhabitant of the EU15 each year. For example, in the global warming category,<br />

each inhabitant of the European Union caused the emission of about 12.6 metric tons of<br />

CO2 equivalents in the year 2001 (see Table 2).<br />

Table 2: Average impact per inhabitant figures in the EU 15<br />

referred to an inhabitant in 2001 [PE International 2003]<br />

Environmental category<br />

Eutrophication potential<br />

Ozone depletion potential<br />

Photochemical ozone creation potential<br />

Global warming potential<br />

Acidification potential<br />

Per capita<br />

33.22<br />

0.22<br />

21.95<br />

12,591.88<br />

72.85<br />

This “normalisation” allows statements to be made regarding the contribution of a<br />

product to total environmental impacts within the European Union. The results can<br />

then be presented on a graph using the same scale. This approach also makes the<br />

results more comprehensible and allows environmental impacts to be compared.<br />

In Table 2, we have listed the average figures per inhabitant for the individual impact<br />

categories. In this context it must be pointed out that the normalisation does not give<br />

13 The glossary contains a detailed description of these environmental impact categories.<br />

15<br />

Unit<br />

kg PO4 equivalents<br />

kg R11 equivalents<br />

kg ethene equivalents<br />

kg CO2 equivalents<br />

kg SO2 equivalents


3 The Golf models assessed<br />

any indication of the relevance of a particular environmental impact, i.e. it does not<br />

imply any judgement on the significance of individual environmental impacts.<br />

Basis of data and data quality<br />

The data used for preparing the Life Cycle Assessment can be subdivided into product<br />

data and process data. “Product data” describes the product itself, and among other<br />

things includes:<br />

• Information on parts, quantities, weights and materials<br />

• Information on fuel consumption and emissions during utilisation<br />

• Information on recycling volumes and processes.<br />

“Process data” includes information on manufacturing and processing steps such as the<br />

provision of electricity, the production of materials and semifinished goods, fabrication<br />

and the production of fuel and consumables. This information is either obtained from<br />

commercial databases or compiled by <strong>Volkswagen</strong> as required.<br />

We ensure that the data selected are as representative as possible. This means that the<br />

data represent the materials, production and other processes as accurately as possible<br />

from a technological, temporal and geographical point of view. For the most part,<br />

published industrial data are used. In addition, we use data that are as up-to-date as<br />

possible and relate to Europe. Where European data are not available, German data are<br />

used. For the various vehicles we always use the same data on upstream supply chains<br />

for energy sources and materials. This means that differences between the latest models<br />

and their predecessors are entirely due to changes in component weights, material<br />

compositions, manufacturing processes at <strong>Volkswagen</strong> and driving emissions, and not<br />

to changes in the raw material, energy and component supply chains.<br />

The Life Cycle Assessment model for vehicle production was developed using <strong>Volkswagen</strong>‘s<br />

slimLCI methodology (see Chapter 1). Vehicle parts lists were used as data<br />

sources for product data, and the weight and materials of each product were taken<br />

from the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> material information system (MISS). This information was then<br />

linked to the corresponding process data in the Life Cycle Assessment software GaBi.<br />

Material inputs, processing procedures and the selection of data in GaBi are stand-<br />

ardised to the greatest possible extent, ensuring that the information provided by<br />

VW slimLCI is consistent and transparent.<br />

16


3 The Golf models assessed<br />

Fig. 7: Excerpt from the model structure of the Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG ®<br />

VW slimLCI methodology not only ensures highly detailed modelling but also high<br />

quality standards for LCA models. Fig. 7 shows an excerpt from the “parts-tree” of the<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG, as extracted from the original parts list for the LCA model.<br />

For the modelling of the vehicle’s service life, representative data for upstream fuel<br />

supply chains were taken from the GaBi database. It was assumed that fuel used in<br />

Europe was transported over a distance of 200 kilometres on average. For the regulated<br />

emissions CO, NOX and HC, direct driving emissions were modelled in accordance with<br />

the Euro 4 (Golf V) and Euro 5 (Golf VI) emission standards.<br />

Table 3: Emission limits in accordance with Euro 4 and Euro 5<br />

Carbon monoxide emissions (CO)<br />

Nitrogen oxide emissions (NOX)<br />

Hydrocarbon emissions (HC)<br />

of which NMHC<br />

NOX+HC emissions<br />

Particulate emissions<br />

Petrol<br />

[g/km]<br />

1.00<br />

0.08<br />

0.10<br />

Diesel<br />

[g/km]<br />

This model too represents a worst case assumption, since actual emissions are in some<br />

cases far below the applicable limits (see Table 4). This means that the regulated servicelife<br />

emissions indicated in the graphs are higher than those that actually occur.<br />

17<br />

Euro 4 emission limits Euro 5 emission limits<br />

0.50<br />

0.25<br />

0.30<br />

0.025<br />

Petrol<br />

[g/km]<br />

1.00<br />

0.06<br />

0.10<br />

0.068<br />

0.005*<br />

Diesel<br />

[g/km]<br />

0.50<br />

0.18<br />

0.23<br />

0.005<br />

* with direct injection


Kraftstoff<br />

Fuel consumption [l/100km]*<br />

(urban/ highway/combined)<br />

Emission standard<br />

Carbon dioxide emissions (CO2)<br />

[g/km]<br />

Carbon monoxide emissions (CO)<br />

[g/km]<br />

Nitrogen oxide emissions (NOX)<br />

[g/km]<br />

Hydrocarbon emissions (HC)<br />

[g/km]<br />

of which NMHC [g/km]<br />

NOX + HC emissions [g/km]<br />

Particulate emissions [g/km]<br />

3 The Golf models assessed<br />

Table 4: Fuel consumption and emissions of vehicles assessed<br />

Golf V<br />

1.9 TDI DPF<br />

Diesel<br />

( 6.3 / 4.5 / 5.1 )<br />

Euro 4<br />

135<br />

0.034<br />

0.179<br />

0.191<br />

0.002<br />

Golf V<br />

1.6 MPI<br />

Petrol (Super)<br />

( 9.9 / 6.1 / 7.4 )<br />

Euro 4<br />

The fuel consumption of the vehicles was calculated in each case from the measured<br />

CO2 emissions and is shown in Table 4. All consumption figures and emissions were<br />

determined on the basis of EU Directives 80/268/EEC and 70/220/EEC [EU 2001; EU<br />

2004] and regulation 692/2008 [EU 2008] for type approval and correspond with the<br />

values presented to the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (Kraftfahrtbundesamt)<br />

for type approval. A sulphur content of 10 ppm was assumed for petrol. 14<br />

Vehicle recycling was modelled on the basis of data from the VW SiCon process and<br />

using representative data from the GaBi database.<br />

In sum, all information relevant to the aims of this study was collected and modelled<br />

with a sufficient degree of completeness. 15 The modelling of vehicle systems on the<br />

basis of vehicle parts lists ensures that the model is complete, especially with respect<br />

to the manufacturing phase. In addition, as the work processes required are automated<br />

to a great extent, any differences in the results are due solely to changes in product<br />

data and not to deviations in the modelling system.<br />

14 In some countries, fuel with a sulphur content of 10 ppm is not yet available. However, even if the sulphur content<br />

were higher, the contribution of sulphur emissions during the vehicle’s service life would still remain negligible.<br />

15 Completeness, as defined by ISO 14040, must always be considered with reference to the objective of the<br />

investigation. In this case, completeness means that the main materials and processes have been reflected. Any<br />

remaining gaps in the data are unavoidable and apply equally to all the vehicles compared.<br />

18<br />

Golf VI<br />

2.0 TDI DPF<br />

Diesel<br />

( 6.0 / 3.7 / 4.5 )<br />

Euro 5<br />

119<br />

0.391<br />

0.116<br />

0.186<br />

0.0007<br />

176<br />

0.759<br />

0.04<br />

0.07<br />

Golf VI<br />

1.6 MPI with DSG ®<br />

Petrol (Super)<br />

( 8.8 / 5.5 / 6.7 )<br />

Euro 5<br />

157<br />

0.351<br />

0.029<br />

0.035<br />

0.025<br />

* Total average consumption (NEDC)


4 Model assumptions and findings of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Model assumptions and findings of the Life<br />

Cycle Assessment<br />

All the framework conditions and assumptions defined for the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

are outlined below.<br />

Table 5: Assumptions and definitions for the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Aim of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

• Comparison of the environmental profiles of predecessor and successor versions<br />

of selected Golf models with petrol and diesel engines<br />

Scope of assessment<br />

19<br />

Function of systems<br />

• Transport of passengers in a five-seater car<br />

Functional unit<br />

• Transport of passengers in a five-seater car over a total distance of 150,000<br />

kilometres in the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), with comparable<br />

utilisation characteristics (e.g. performance, loading volume)<br />

Comparability<br />

• Comparable performance figures<br />

• Cars with standard equipment and fittings<br />

System limits<br />

• The system limits include the entire life cycle of the cars (manufacture, service<br />

life and recycling phase).<br />

Cut-off criteria<br />

• The assessment does not include maintenance or repairs<br />

• No environmental impact credits are awarded for secondary raw materials<br />

produced<br />

• Cut-off criteria applied in GaBi data records, as described in the software<br />

documentation (www.gabi-software.com)<br />

• Explicit cut-off criteria, such as weight or relevance limits, are not applied<br />

Allocation<br />

• Allocations used in GaBi data records, as described in the software documentation<br />

(www.gabi-software.com)<br />

• No further allocations are used


4 Model assumptions and findings of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Data basis<br />

• <strong>Volkswagen</strong> vehicle parts lists<br />

• Material and weight information from the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> Material Information<br />

System (MISS)<br />

• Technical data sheets<br />

• Technical drawings<br />

• Emission limits (for regulated emissions) laid down in current EU legislation<br />

• The data used comes from the GaBi database or was collected in cooperation<br />

with VW plants, suppliers or industrial partners<br />

Life Cycle Inventory results<br />

• Material compositions in accordance with VDA (German Association of the<br />

Automotive Industry) Standard 231-106<br />

• Life Cycle Inventory results include emissions of CO2, CO, SO2, NOX, NMVOC,<br />

CH4, as well as consumption of energy resources<br />

• The impact assessment includes the environmental impact categories eutrophication<br />

potential, ozone depletion potential, photochemical ozone creation<br />

potential, global warming potential for a reference period of 100 years and<br />

acidification potential<br />

• Standardisation of the results to average impact per inhabitant values<br />

Software<br />

• Life Cycle Assessment software GaBi, and GaBi DfX Tool and VW slimLCI<br />

interface as support tools<br />

Evaluation<br />

20<br />

• Evaluation of Life Cycle Inventory and impact assessment results, subdivided<br />

into life cycle phases and individual processes<br />

• Comparisons of impact assessment results of the vehicles compared<br />

• Interpretation of results


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Material composition<br />

Fig. 8 shows the material composition of a Golf VI 2.0 TDI in accordance with the VDA<br />

(German Association of the Automotive Industry) standard 231-106 for material classification<br />

[VDA 1997]. 16 The graph indicates the material composition of and material<br />

shares in the vehicle assessed.<br />

Fig. 8: Material composition of Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF<br />

Material composition<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF*<br />

65 %<br />

The Golf VI 2.0 TDI consists of 65 percent steel and iron materials and 17 percent various<br />

plastics (polymer materials). It also contains about six percent light alloys, such as<br />

aluminium and magnesium. Nonferrous metals, such as copper and brass, account for<br />

about three percent of the car‘s materials. The composite and other materials, which<br />

account for approximately three percent of the vehicle by weight, include ceramics and<br />

glass, renewable raw materials and materials which are inseparably joined, e.g. metal<br />

coated with plastic. Operating fluids, such as oils, fuel, brake fluid, coolant and washing<br />

water combined, account for about five percent of the total vehicle weight. The remaining<br />

approximately one percent is made up of process polymers such as paints<br />

and adhesives. The share of electronics and electrics is extremely low because the<br />

materials used in these components have been itemised in detail on the basis of the<br />

16 Unladen weight in accordance with DIN 70020 without driver and with the fuel tank filled to 90% of capacity.<br />

21<br />

Steel and iron materials<br />

Light alloys, cast and<br />

wrought alloys<br />

Nonferrous heavy metals,<br />

cast and wrought alloys<br />

Special metals<br />

Polymer materials<br />

Process polymers<br />

Other materials and<br />

composite materials<br />

Electronics and electrics<br />

Fuels and auxiliary<br />

materials<br />

6 %<br />

3 %<br />

0.05 %<br />

1 %<br />

3 %<br />

0.01 %<br />

5 %<br />

17 %<br />

* Diesel particulate filter


DIN unladen weight [kg]<br />

Steel and iron materials<br />

5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

MISS data and can be allocated to other VDA categories. As shown in Table 6 there are<br />

only very slight differences between the material compositions of the vehicles assessed.<br />

Table 6: Material composition<br />

Light alloys, cast and<br />

wrought alloys<br />

Nonferrous metals, cast and<br />

wrought alloys<br />

Special metals<br />

Polymer materials<br />

Process polymers<br />

Other materials and<br />

composite materials<br />

Electronics and electrics<br />

Fuels and auxiliary materials<br />

Golf V<br />

1.9 TDI DPF<br />

1251<br />

64.32 %<br />

6.38 %<br />

2.43 %<br />

0.02 %<br />

17.85 %<br />

1.25 %<br />

2.77 %<br />

0.01 %<br />

4.96 %<br />

Golf V<br />

1.6 MPI<br />

So the material composition of the latest models has remained almost the same as in<br />

their predecessors.<br />

Results of the Life Cycle Inventory<br />

The information on the life cycle inventories is divided into the three life cycle phases:<br />

manufacturing, service life and recycling. The manufacturing phase is subdivided into<br />

vehicle and engine/transmission manufacturing, while the service life differentiates<br />

between the environmental impact caused by the upstream fuel supply chain and direct<br />

driving emissions. The contribution shown for recycling only indicates the impacts of<br />

recycling processes but does not include any environmental impact credits for secondary<br />

raw materials produced.<br />

Fig. 9 clearly shows that the emissions of the Golf V 1.9 TDI, such as carbon dioxide<br />

(CO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX), are mainly generated during<br />

the service life of the car.<br />

22<br />

Golf VI<br />

2.0 TDI DPF<br />

1266<br />

64.54 %<br />

6.47 %<br />

2.52 %<br />

0.05 %<br />

17.27 %<br />

1.34 %<br />

3.00 %<br />

0.01 %<br />

4.80 %<br />

1173<br />

62.45 %<br />

7.50 %<br />

2.31 %<br />

0.03 %<br />

18.69 %<br />

1.27 %<br />

2.66 %<br />

0.02 %<br />

5.08 %<br />

Golf VI<br />

1.6 MPI with DSG ®<br />

1190<br />

63.52 %<br />

7.15 %<br />

2.21 %<br />

0.09 %<br />

17.87 %<br />

1.38 %<br />

2.95 %<br />

0.01 %<br />

4.82 %


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

Life Cycle Inventories<br />

Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF*<br />

[27.6 t] [116.8 kg] [28.1 kg] [54.0 kg] [17.7 kg] [31.9 kg] [409.2 GJ]<br />

Carbon<br />

dioxide<br />

(CO 2 )<br />

Vehicle manufacture<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Driving emissions<br />

Recycling<br />

Carbon<br />

monoxide<br />

(CO)<br />

Sulphur<br />

dioxide<br />

(SO 2 )<br />

Fig. 9: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF<br />

Nitrogen<br />

oxides<br />

(NO X )<br />

Hydro<br />

carbons<br />

(NMVOC)<br />

Methane<br />

(CH 4 )<br />

Primary<br />

energy<br />

demand<br />

* Diesel particulate filter<br />

In contrast, both methane emissions and primary energy demand are dominated by<br />

the fuel supply phase – from the wellhead to the filling station. As a result of the low<br />

sulphur content assumed for the fuels used, the manufacturing phase accounts for the<br />

greater part of overall sulphur dioxide emissions. CO2 emissions over the entire life<br />

cycle of the Golf V 1.9 TDI reach approximately 27.6 metric tons. The total energy<br />

demand amounts to about 409 GJ.<br />

23


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

Life Cycle Inventories<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF*<br />

[24.7 t] [117.4 kg] [25.2 kg] [42.0 kg] [17.0 kg] [28.7 kg] [364.5 GJ]<br />

Carbon<br />

dioxide<br />

(CO 2 )<br />

Vehicle manufacture<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Driving emissions<br />

Recycling<br />

Carbon<br />

monoxide<br />

(CO)<br />

Sulphur<br />

dioxide<br />

(SO 2 )<br />

Fig. 10: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF<br />

Nitrogen<br />

oxides<br />

(NO X )<br />

Hydro<br />

carbons<br />

(NMVOC)<br />

Methane<br />

(CH 4 )<br />

Primary<br />

energy<br />

demand<br />

* Diesel particulate filter<br />

The life cycle inventories for the Golf VI 2.0 TDI and the Golf V 1.9 TDI show that there<br />

is no significant difference between the two models as regards the shares of the life<br />

cycle phases (engine and transmission manufacture, vehicle manufacture, fuel supply,<br />

driving emissions and recycling) in the overall figures (see Fig. 9 and Fig. 10). However,<br />

the absolute figures indicate the savings achieved by the latest model compared with<br />

its predecessor. For example, the CO2 emissions of the Golf VI are only 24.7 instead of<br />

27.6 metric tons and the total energy demand for the Golf VI has fallen from 409 to<br />

approximately 365 GJ. Only the CO value has risen slightly, due to an increase in CO<br />

emissions in vehicle manufacture. However, the share of these CO emissions in the<br />

overall figure is negligible, at well below one percent.<br />

24


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

The next two graphs, Fig. 11 and Fig. 12, show the results of the life cycle inventories for<br />

the petrol-engined cars. The figures clearly indicate that the share of the manufacturing<br />

phase in overall emissions is lower than in the case of the diesel models. There are two<br />

main reasons for this: firstly, the environmental impact of manufacturing petrol-engined<br />

cars is slightly lower than for diesel cars; secondly, the service life of a petrol-engined<br />

vehicle accounts for a greater share of life cycle emissions as a result of its higher fuel<br />

consumption.<br />

The Golf V 1.6 MPI causes 36.4 metric tons of CO2 emissions and has a total energy de-<br />

mand of 510.4 GJ (see Fig. 11).<br />

Carbon<br />

dioxide<br />

(CO 2 )<br />

Vehicle manufacture<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Driving emissions<br />

Recycling<br />

Carbon<br />

monoxide<br />

(CO)<br />

Sulphur<br />

dioxide<br />

(SO 2 )<br />

Fig. 11: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf V 1.6 MPI<br />

25<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

Life Cycle Inventories<br />

Golf V 1.6 MPI<br />

[36.4 t] [194.2 kg] [38.4 kg] [32.5 kg] [30.4 kg] [39.3 kg] [510.4 GJ]<br />

Nitrogen<br />

oxides<br />

(NO X )<br />

Hydro<br />

carbons<br />

(NMVOC)<br />

Methane<br />

(CH 4 )<br />

Primary<br />

energy<br />

demand


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

The successor model Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG causes 3.3 metric tons less CO2 emissions<br />

and also has a significantly lower energy demand (see Fig. 12). This is a direct result of<br />

the reduction in fuel consumption compared with the predecessor model. Owing to the<br />

considerable share of service-life emissions in the overall life cycle figures, the significantly<br />

lower fuel consumption also leads to improvements in all the other Life Cycle<br />

Inventory figures.<br />

Carbon<br />

dioxide<br />

(CO 2 )<br />

Vehicle manufacture<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Driving emissions<br />

Recycling<br />

Carbon<br />

monoxide<br />

(CO)<br />

Sulphur<br />

dioxide<br />

(SO 2 )<br />

Nitrogen<br />

oxides<br />

(NO X )<br />

Fig. 12: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG<br />

26<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

Life Cycle Inventories<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

[33.1 t] [193.7 kg] [36.9 kg] [28.5 kg] [29.5 kg] [36.8 kg] [469.8 GJ]<br />

Hydro<br />

carbons<br />

(NMVOC)<br />

Methane<br />

(CH 4 )<br />

Primary<br />

energy<br />

demand


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Comparison of Life Cycle Impacts<br />

On the basis of the Life Cycle Inventory data, Life Cycle Impact Assessments are drawn<br />

up for all the environmental impact categories. The interactions of all the emissions<br />

recorded are considered and potential environmental impacts are determined based<br />

on scientific models (see Fig. 3).<br />

Diesel vehicles<br />

With reference to average impact per inhabitant in the EU, Fig. 13 clearly shows that<br />

all the vehicles considered here make their largest contributions to overall environmental<br />

impacts in the global warming potential category, followed by acidification<br />

and photochemical ozone creation. Contributions to the categories eutrophication<br />

and ozone depletion potential are smaller. Consequently, the notes below focus on<br />

the first three environmental impact categories.<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Global warming<br />

potential<br />

Photochemical<br />

ozone<br />

Acidification Ozone depletion<br />

Fig. 13: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF and Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF<br />

27<br />

Comparison of environmental profiles of Golf diesel cars (absolute)<br />

Average value per inhabitant, EU 15, 2001<br />

CO 2 equivalents<br />

[t]<br />

28.5<br />

25.5<br />

Predecessor<br />

Ethen equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

12.3 11.6<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF *<br />

SO 2 equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

67.4<br />

56.0<br />

R11 equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

0.40 0.36<br />

PO 4 equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

8.0<br />

6.4<br />

Eutrophication<br />

* Diesel particulate filter


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Fig. 14 shows that the environmental impacts of the Golf VI 2.0 TDI are lower in all<br />

categories than those of its predecessor, the Golf V 1.9 TDI. At 17 percent, the reduction<br />

in acidification potential is the most pronounced. This is mainly due to compliance<br />

with a more stringent exhaust emission standard, i.e. reduced NOx emissions.<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Comparison of environmental profiles of Golf diesel cars (relative)<br />

relative to Golf V MPI<br />

Predecessor<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF *<br />

-11% -6% -17%<br />

Global warming potential Photochemical ozone creation Acidification<br />

Fig. 14: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF and Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF (relative)<br />

* Diesel particulate filter<br />

As regards global warming potential, the additional impact caused by a slight increase<br />

in vehicle weight, the improved emission class and the higher engine output of the<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI are compensated for by the reduced fuel consumption. The significant<br />

(11 percent) reduction in global warming potential represents a cut of approximately<br />

3 metric tons of CO2 equivalents. Fig. 15 shows how these reductions are achieved. The<br />

absolute environmental impacts are allocated to the individual life cycle phases. As<br />

was already evident from the analysis of the Life Cycle Inventory data, the relevant<br />

changes occur during the use of the vehicle and the production of the fuel required.<br />

Most of the improvements therefore result either directly (lower driving emissions) or<br />

indirectly (less fuel production) from lower fuel consumption. It can also be seen that<br />

the impact of the recycling phase is marginal for all the models considered.<br />

28


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Allocation of environmental impacts to life cycle phases for<br />

Golf diesel models (detail)<br />

Average value per inhabitant, EU 15, 2001<br />

Global warming potential Photochemical ozone creation Acidification<br />

Predecessor<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF *<br />

Recycling<br />

Driving emissions<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Production<br />

Fig. 15: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF and Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF (detail)<br />

* Diesel particulate filter<br />

Fig. 16 below shows the environmental impacts described in relation to each other and<br />

over the entire life cycle of the vehicle. The relations between manufacture, use and<br />

recycling with regard to the individual environmental impacts can clearly be seen.<br />

Global warming potential in particular is influenced mainly by vehicle use (highest<br />

increase over service life).<br />

On the other hand, acidification and photochemical ozone creation are distributed more<br />

evenly over all the phases of the life cycle. The significant reductions in these impacts<br />

are chiefly due to the more stringent exhaust emission standard of the successor model.<br />

29


Predecessor model<br />

Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF *<br />

5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

Comparison of the environmental profiles of the Golf diesel models<br />

Average impact per inhabitant, EU 15, 2001<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Use Recycling<br />

Fig. 16: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle – diesel models<br />

30<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

2.4<br />

2.2<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

Global warming potential<br />

Acidification<br />

Photochemical ozone creation<br />

0 km Kilometres driven (model calculation) 150,000 km<br />

* Diesel particulate filter


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Petrol vehicles<br />

A comparison of the petrol vehicles also shows that the greatest potential environ-<br />

mental impacts are in the areas of photochemical ozone creation, global warming<br />

potential and acidification. In this case too, the Golf VI represents an improvement<br />

over its predecessor in all categories (see Fig. 17).<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Comparison of environmental profiles of Golf petrol-engined models<br />

(absolute)<br />

Average value per inhabitant, EU 15, 2001<br />

37.5<br />

34.1<br />

Global warming<br />

potential<br />

Predecessor<br />

18.7 18.2<br />

Photochemical<br />

ozone<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

Fig. 17: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.6 MPI and Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

0.41 0.40<br />

Acidification Ozone depletion Eutrophication<br />

The life cycle global warming potential of the Golf VI MPI DSG is considerably lower<br />

than that of its predecessor. In the case of the 7-speed DSG dual-clutch gearbox, the<br />

combination with an automatic transmission, which normally results in higher fuel<br />

consumption than with a manual transmission, actually improves fuel economy. This<br />

confirms the innovative potential of the DSG and the associated fuel saving that is<br />

31<br />

CO 2 equivalents<br />

[t]<br />

Ethen equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

SO 2 equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

62.7<br />

58.5<br />

R11 equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

PO 4 equivalents<br />

[kg]<br />

5.4 4.8


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

possible. Overall, for the assumed distance driven of 150,000 kilometres, greenhouse gas<br />

emissions show a reduction of around 3.4 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per vehicle.<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Comparison of environmental profiles of petrol-engined Golf models<br />

(relative)<br />

relative to Golf V MPI<br />

Global warming potential Photochemical ozone creation Acidification<br />

Predecessor<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

-9% -3% -7%<br />

Fig. 18: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.6 MPI and Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG (relative)<br />

Fig. 18 indicates the changes in environmental impacts between the Golf V 1.6 MPI and<br />

its successor, the Golf VI MPI with DSG. The diagram clearly shows that photochemical<br />

ozone creation potential has been reduced by three percent and acidification potential<br />

by seven percent. In the case of global warming potential, the reduction of 3.4 metric<br />

tons of CO2 equivalents described above corresponds to a drop of nine percent.<br />

Fig. 19 indicates the sources of these improvements in detail. As in the case of the diesel<br />

models, most of the reductions are the result of the lower fuel consumption of the Golf VI<br />

1.6 MPI with DSG. It can clearly be seen that the driving emissions and the contribution<br />

to emissions associated with fuel supply are both lower in the case of the successor model.<br />

Compliance with a higher exhaust emissions class in the case of the Golf VI also has an<br />

effect in reducing environmental impact. It can also be seen that the manufacture of the<br />

successor model results in a slightly higher environmental impact. However, improvements<br />

in the service life emissions and fuel supply easily outweigh this increase. In the<br />

petrol models too, the recycling phase has only a negligible environmental impact.<br />

32


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

3.2<br />

2.8<br />

2.4<br />

2.0<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

Allocation of environmental impacts to life cycle phases for<br />

petrol-engined Golf models (detail)<br />

Average value per inhabitant, EU 15, 2001<br />

Global warming potential Photochemical ozone creation Acidification<br />

Predecessor<br />

Golf VI 1,6 MPI DSG<br />

Recycling<br />

Driving emissions<br />

Fuel supply<br />

Production<br />

Fig. 19: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.6 MPI and Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG (detail)<br />

The diagram also shows the order of magnitude of the reductions. In the case of the<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG (compared with the Golf V 1.6 MPI), the reduction in global<br />

warming potential is almost sufficient to compensate for the slightly increased emissions<br />

during vehicle production. This means that, compared with its predecessor, the Golf<br />

VI 1.6 MPI with DSG, viewed over its entire life cycle, saves more than 70 percent of the<br />

CO2 equivalents (3.4 metric tons) generated during the entire production of the vehicle<br />

(4.8 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per vehicle).<br />

In the case of the petrol models, the global warming potential is even more predominant<br />

than in the case of the diesel models (see Fig. 20). The lower values of the Golf VI 1.6 MPI<br />

with DSG can clearly be seen. The benefits in terms of acidification and photochemical<br />

ozone creation potential are also due to lower fuel consumption, the associated reduced<br />

environmental impact of fuel production and the more stringent exhaust emissions<br />

standard for the successor model.<br />

33


Predecessor model<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

3.2<br />

3.0<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

2.4<br />

2.2<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

Comparison of the environmental profiles of the Golf petrol models<br />

Average impact per inhabitant, EU 15, 2001<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Use Recycling<br />

Global warming potential<br />

Acidification<br />

Photochemical ozone creation<br />

0 km Kilometres driven (model calculation) 150,000 km<br />

Fig. 20: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle – petrol models<br />

Differentiation of environmental impact caused by manufacturing<br />

While it is relatively easy to draw up life cycle inventories for the service life of a vehicle,<br />

the procedure for the manufacturing phase is considerably more complex as a result of<br />

the wide variety of different parts, materials and processes involved. In the past, it was<br />

necessary to use cut-off criteria in order to simplify the process and to group together<br />

material data for a number of different components. Today, the slimLCI process described<br />

in Chapter 1 allows detailed analyses of the entire parts structure of a vehicle<br />

and all the associated material data.<br />

Furthermore, the LCI process means that a wide variety of information normally omitted<br />

from life cycle inventories in the past can now be considered. This information includes<br />

part numbers that clearly identify all the parts taken into account, the sources of<br />

material and weight data (parts lists, MISS, drawings, etc.) and the assignment of parts<br />

to the six separate disciplines within the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> Development department: engine,<br />

transmission, equipment, electrical, body and chassis.<br />

34


5 Results of the Life Cycle Assessment<br />

The structured inclusion of this information in the Life Cycle Inventory model supports<br />

environmentally compatible product development by clearly identifying design respon-<br />

sibilities and hot spots that can be used as the starting point for further optimisation.<br />

Contribution of different disciplines to the global<br />

warming potential generated by vehicle production<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

13.9 %<br />

Fig. 21: Contribution of different disciplines to the global warming potential generated by production of the<br />

Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG<br />

Fig. 21 indicates the contributions of these disciplines to the global warming potential<br />

generated by the production of the Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG. In addition to the six disciplines<br />

mentioned above, the shares of painting (paintshop at Wolfsburg plus paint<br />

supply chains) and final assembly are also shown. As the chart shows, the body makes<br />

the largest contribution to global warming potential in the manufacturing phase,<br />

followed by chassis, engine and equipment.<br />

The high level of detail used for Life Cycle Inventory modelling means that the contributions<br />

of the various disciplines can be broken down to the level of individual SETs<br />

(simultaneous engineering teams) and even to the individual components concerned.<br />

This lays the foundations for a targeted approach to the definition and discussion of<br />

optimisation measures.<br />

35<br />

Equipment<br />

Electrical<br />

Chassis<br />

Transmission<br />

Body<br />

Painting<br />

Assembly<br />

Engine<br />

7.9 %<br />

2.6 %<br />

14.6 %<br />

34.4 %<br />

4.4 %<br />

3.4 %<br />

18.8 %


6 Recycling end-of-life vehicles with the VW SiCon process<br />

Recycling end-of-life vehicles with the<br />

VW SiCon process<br />

The VW SiCon process used for life cycle<br />

inventories for the vehicle recycling phase<br />

was jointly developed by <strong>Volkswagen</strong> and<br />

SiCon GmbH in cooperation with further<br />

technology partners. The aim of the<br />

process is to recycle and process end-oflife<br />

vehicles in a way that yields secondary<br />

raw materials that can be substituted for<br />

primary raw materials in existing plant and<br />

equipment. The materials must therefore<br />

meet the quality standards of the plant<br />

operators concerned. That includes not<br />

only process requirements but also the<br />

requirements relating to products and<br />

emissions. Another important consideration<br />

when the process was developed was to<br />

ensure that the secondary raw materials<br />

produced are destined for use in processes<br />

where the demand for such materials is<br />

sufficient to ensure that the uptake of<br />

these materials is assured nationwide<br />

and in the long term. Currently, there is<br />

a greater demand for secondary raw<br />

materials than can actually be met by the<br />

VW SiCon process. To ensure these aims<br />

are met, potential plant operators and consumers were involved in the development of<br />

the process at an early stage. As a result, it was possible to ensure that the materials<br />

produced meet the physical and chemical requirements of the plant operators concerned.<br />

Along with the development of the process, a Life Cycle Assessment was drawn up<br />

to analyse and evaluate the environmental profiles of the different process options.<br />

This approach – in particular the constructive dialogue with technology partners along<br />

the entire value chain – is a key element in successful life cycle management. When an<br />

end-of-life vehicle is recycled using the VW SiCon process, the first step is to drain all<br />

fluids and to remove certain parts before the remaining body is shredded. Shredder<br />

residues are subjected to different separation processes and further refining. The<br />

generated fractions are shredder fluff, shredder sand and shredder granulate, as well as<br />

a PVC-enriched plastic fraction. These fractions are then recycled. Around five percent<br />

of the vehicle by weight is not recyclable and is disposed of as waste. Fig. 22 provides an<br />

overview of the sequence of operations in the VW SiCon process.<br />

36


6 Recycling end-of-life vehicles with the VW SiCon process<br />

Removal of pollutants/<br />

fluids, dismantling<br />

End-of-life vehicle<br />

Fluids, wheels,<br />

batteries,<br />

catalytic converters<br />

Spare parts<br />

Iron and steel<br />

scrap<br />

Fig. 22: End-of-life vehicle treatment with the VW SiCon process<br />

Shredding and separation of shredder residues<br />

Shredder<br />

VW-SiCon<br />

process<br />

Non-ferrous<br />

metals<br />

Shredder<br />

granulate<br />

Shredder<br />

fluff<br />

Shredder<br />

sand<br />

PVC<br />

fraction<br />

Residues<br />

The selective processing of the shredder residues for subsequent recycling is shown in<br />

Fig. 23. The shredder granulate consists of a plastic fraction containing very little PVC<br />

and metal, which can be used to replace heavy fuel oil as a reducing agent in blast<br />

furnaces. But before that a PVC-rich fraction is separated. The PVC can be recovered,<br />

for example using the Vinyloop ® 17 process. The shredder fluff primarily consists of seat<br />

foams and textile fibres and replaces coal dust as a dehydration agent in sewage sludge<br />

treatment. The shredder sand, consisting of different metal dusts, paint particles, rust,<br />

sand and glass, is suitable for use as a slag forming material in non-ferrous metallurgy.<br />

The copper contained in the shredder sand can be recovered in copper smelting plants.<br />

It should be mentioned that the VW SiCon process is currently the only method of<br />

returning copper to the production process by separating it from a sand fraction<br />

enriched with silicate and copper and low in organic substances in combination with<br />

high-end recycling. This type of recycling is one of the few sources of a raw material<br />

which is essential for many European industries.<br />

17 A process developed by Solvay which can be used for recovering PVC from shredder residue rich in PVC.<br />

37


6 Recycling end-of-life vehicles with the VW SiCon process<br />

Main Shredder residue recycling process<br />

Iron and steel<br />

Non-ferrous<br />

materials<br />

Raw<br />

granulate<br />

Fig. 23: Selective processing of the material fractions from the VW SiCon process<br />

Of course, we have also drawn up a Life Cycle Assessment for the VW SiCon process,<br />

comparing it with the dismantling and subsequent recycling of end-of-life vehicles<br />

[Krinke et al 2005]. Fig. 24 shows the results of this assessment. The Life Cycle Assessment<br />

revealed that the process has advantages in the environmental impact categories<br />

global warming potential, acidification potential, photochemical ozone creation<br />

potential and eutrophication potential; these advantages range from 9 percent for<br />

eutrophication potential to 29 percent for global warming potential. In addition, the<br />

study also investigated sensitivity to a number of factors such as transportation distance,<br />

degree of dismantling, the ratio of primary to secondary plastics and the material<br />

composition of the recycled vehicles. Even under less favourable conditions, it was<br />

found that the basic conclusion shown by Fig. 24 still held. In environmental terms,<br />

the VW SiCon process is always preferable to the dismantling of plastic components.<br />

38<br />

Shredder residues<br />

Raw<br />

fluff<br />

Customer-specific recycling steps<br />

Granulate<br />

PVC<br />

fraction<br />

Blast furnaces<br />

Vinyloop ®<br />

Raw<br />

sand<br />

Fluff Sand Residues<br />

Sewage sludge<br />

treatment<br />

Non-ferrous secondary<br />

smelting plant<br />

Disposal


6 Recycling end-of-life vehicles with the VW SiCon process<br />

0%<br />

-20%<br />

-40%<br />

-60%<br />

-80%<br />

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment<br />

Potential reduction in environmental impact in percent<br />

Global warming<br />

potential<br />

Fig. 24: Life Cycle Assessment of the VW SiCon process compared with the dismantling of plastic parts<br />

In 2006 <strong>Volkswagen</strong> was awarded the<br />

European Business Award for the Environ-<br />

ment and the Environmental Award of the<br />

Federation of German Industries (BDI)<br />

for the VW SiCon process. You can find<br />

further information on the VW SiCon process<br />

and download the relevant reports<br />

on the Internet at:<br />

www.volkswagen-environment.de<br />

39<br />

-71%<br />

Acidification<br />

potential<br />

VW SiCon process Dismantling<br />

Demontage<br />

-87%<br />

Photochemical ozone<br />

creation potential<br />

-83%<br />

Eutrophication<br />

potential<br />

-94%


7 We‘re driving mobility forward<br />

We‘re driving mobility forward<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> is working on a number of technologies for sustainable<br />

mobility as part of its Powertrain and Fuel Strategy. This covers the<br />

entire range of present and future drive systems from current petrol<br />

and diesel engines via hybrid drives and engines with the Combined<br />

Combustion System (CCS) to electric vehicles with batteries<br />

or hydrogen technology.<br />

We are engaged in a number of projects with partners to produce<br />

fuels from various different raw materials. For <strong>Volkswagen</strong>, the<br />

main emphasis is on second-generation biofuels such as Sun-<br />

Fuel ® , which can be produced from biomass; during combustion,<br />

these fuels only release into the atmosphere the same volume of<br />

carbon dioxide as was absorbed by the plants as they grew. SunFuel can be produced<br />

from all types of biomass and therefore does not compete with food production.<br />

SunFuel is already being produced in the world’s first production plant at Freiberg in<br />

Germany and tested in practice. In technical terms, both petrol and diesel could already<br />

be replaced by SunFuel ® .<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> is also<br />

forging ahead with<br />

the development<br />

of hybrid vehicles,<br />

which can be especially<br />

beneficial<br />

in inner-city driving<br />

and conurbations.<br />

Various prototypes<br />

are already being<br />

tested. We expect<br />

that the results obtained<br />

by the Golf<br />

TwinDrive fleet, equipped with an internal combustion engine, an electric motor and<br />

a lithium ion battery, will be especially promising. The special feature of the TwinDrive<br />

is that the internal combustion engine provides assistance for the electric motor,<br />

and not vice versa. This means that the vehicle can be driven considerable distances<br />

through cities without producing any direct emissions. In electric propulsion mode,<br />

the range of the TwinDrive is about 50 kilometres, which would be perfectly adequate<br />

for most everyday trips. It only takes about four hours to recharge the batteries and any<br />

power socket can be used. In contrast to internal combustion engines, electric drive<br />

systems generate no local emissions. From 2010, up to 20 vehicles will be involved in an<br />

electric mobility fleet test in Berlin and Wolfsburg to test electric propulsion in everyday<br />

use and to confirm the undeniable benefits of this drive system. In a zero-emission<br />

40


7 We‘re driving mobility forward<br />

prototype of the “New Small Family” series, <strong>Volkswagen</strong> has already demonstrated an<br />

electric motor drawing its power from a pack of lithium ion batteries. Powered solely<br />

by batteries, the prototype can already cover the average daily<br />

distances driven in today’s urban traffic.<br />

In the long term, <strong>Volkswagen</strong> regards the electric motor as the drive<br />

system of the future. It is still not possible to state whether electricpowered<br />

vehicles will take their power from plug-in batteries or<br />

fuel cells in the future. As part of its Powertrain and Fuel Strategy,<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> is also investigating the potential of fuel cells. For<br />

example, we have developed a unique type of high-temperature<br />

fuel cell that eliminates many of the problems associated with<br />

previous low-temperature systems. The high-temperature fuel cell<br />

will make the entire drive system installed in a vehicle lighter,<br />

smaller, more durable and<br />

less expensive. <strong>Volkswagen</strong><br />

is expecting to start testing<br />

the first prototypes with<br />

high-temperature fuel cells<br />

in 2009. Current forecasts<br />

predict that the first production<br />

vehicles will not,<br />

however, be launched before<br />

2020.<br />

A key element in the<br />

growing trend towards<br />

electrification will be the use of energy from renewable sources<br />

such as wind or solar energy or hydropower. Ideally, an electric<br />

vehicle should be able to „fill up“ directly with electricity. This<br />

drive system has the benefit of high overall efficiency as the<br />

electric power is used directly for propulsion, avoiding the high<br />

energy losses associated with hydrogen production.<br />

41


8 Conclusion<br />

Conclusion<br />

As the best-selling car in Europe, the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> Golf not only fulfils high expectations<br />

in terms of safety, comfort and performance but also attains a very high standard of<br />

environmentally compatible product development. This environmental commendation<br />

documents the progress that has been achieved in this area in the Golf VI compared<br />

with the predecessor model. The information provided in this document is based on<br />

the Life Cycle Assessment of the Golf, which has been verified and certified by TÜV<br />

NORD. The TÜV report confirms that the Life Cycle Assessment is based on reliable<br />

data and was drawn up using methods in accordance with the requirements of ISO<br />

standards 14040 and 14044.<br />

The Golf demonstrates low fuel consumption and emissions during its service life<br />

and low environmental impacts during the manufacturing and recycling phases.<br />

With approximately the same total weight and comparable power output, the Golf VI<br />

presents a more favourable overall Life Cycle Assessment than its predecessor.<br />

42<br />

All information corresponds to the state of knowledge at the time of going to print.


9 Validation<br />

Validation<br />

The statements made in the Golf environmental commendation are supported by the<br />

Life Cycle Assessment of the Golf. The certificate of validity confirms that the Life Cycle<br />

Assessment is based on reliable data and that the method used to compile it complies<br />

with the requirements of ISO standards 14040 and 14044.<br />

You will find the detailed report from TÜV NORD in the Appendix.<br />

43


Kohlenwasserstoffe<br />

Stickoxide<br />

Glossary<br />

Glossary<br />

Allocation<br />

Allocation of Life Cycle Inventory parameters to the „actual source“ in the case of<br />

processes that have several inputs.<br />

Average impact per inhabitant figure (EDW)<br />

Unit indicating the standardised environmental impact Überschrift of one inhabitant für Kreisdiagramm in a<br />

geographical reference area.<br />

Headline for pie chart<br />

Eutrophication potential<br />

describes excessive input of nutrients into<br />

water [or soil], which can lead to an undesirable<br />

change in the composition of flora and<br />

fauna. A secondary effect of the over-fertilisation<br />

of water is oxygen consumption and<br />

therefore oxygen deficiency. The reference<br />

substance for eutrophication is phosphate<br />

(PO4), and all other substances that impact on<br />

this process (for instance NOX, NH3) are<br />

measured in phosphate equivalents.<br />

Ozone depletion potential<br />

describes the ability of trace gases to rise into<br />

the stratosphere and deplete ozone there in a<br />

catalytic process. Halogenated hydrocarbons<br />

in particular are involved in this depletion<br />

process, which diminishes or destroys the<br />

protective function of the natural ozone layer.<br />

The ozone layer provides protection against<br />

excessive UV radiation and therefore against<br />

genetic damage or impairment of photosynthesis<br />

in plants. The reference substance for ozone<br />

depletion potential is R11, and all other<br />

substances that impact on this process (for<br />

instance CFC, N2O) are measured in R11<br />

equivalents.<br />

44<br />

NO X<br />

Biomass<br />

Air pollutants<br />

NH 3<br />

Überschrift für Kreisdiagramm<br />

Headline for pie chart<br />

Stratosphere<br />

15 – 50 km<br />

UV radiation<br />

Biomass<br />

Transpor<br />

Transpor<br />

Kraftstoffherstellun<br />

PO 4 NO 3 NH 4<br />

CFC<br />

Waste water<br />

N 2 O<br />

Kraftstoffherstellun<br />

Fertiliser application<br />

Absorption


Kohlenwasserstoffe<br />

Stickoxide<br />

Kohlenwasserstoffe<br />

Stickoxide<br />

Glossar<br />

Photochemical ozone creation potential<br />

describes the formation of photooxidants,<br />

such as ozone, PAN, etc., which can be formed<br />

from hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide (CO)<br />

and nitrogen oxides (NOX), in conjunction with<br />

sunlight. Photooxidants can impair human<br />

health and the functioning of ecosystems<br />

and damage plants. The reference substance<br />

for the formation of photochemical ozone is<br />

ethene, and all other substances that impact<br />

on this process (for instance VOC, NOX and<br />

CO) are measured in ethene equivalents.<br />

Global warming potential<br />

describes the emissions of greenhouse gases,<br />

which increase the absorption of heat from solar<br />

radiation in the atmosphere and therefore<br />

increase the average global temperature. The<br />

reference substance for global warming<br />

potential is CO2, and all other substances that<br />

impact on this process (for instance CH4, N2O,<br />

SF6 and VOC) are measured in carbon dioxide<br />

equivalents.<br />

Acidification potential<br />

describes the emission of acidifying substances<br />

such as SO2 and NOX, etc., which have diverse<br />

impacts on soil, water, ecosystems, biological<br />

organisms and material (e.g. buildings). Forest<br />

dieback and fish mortality in lakes are examples<br />

of such negative effects. The reference substance<br />

for acidification potential is SO2, and<br />

all other substances that impact on this process<br />

(for instance NOX and NH3) are measured in<br />

sulphur dioxide equivalents.<br />

Environmental impact category<br />

An environmental indicator that describes an<br />

environmental problem (e.g. the formation of<br />

photochemical ozone)<br />

45<br />

Überschrift für Kreisdiagramm<br />

Headline for pie chart<br />

Hydrocarbons<br />

Nitrogen oxides<br />

Biomass<br />

Weather<br />

Transpor<br />

dry and warm<br />

OZONE<br />

Überschrift für Kreisdiagramm<br />

Headline for pie chart<br />

UV radiation<br />

Infrared<br />

radiation<br />

Überschrift für Kreisdiagramm<br />

Headline for pie chart<br />

H 2 SO 4<br />

Biomass<br />

HNO 3<br />

Transpor<br />

Absorption<br />

CO 2<br />

SO 2<br />

Hydrocarbons<br />

Nitrogen oxides<br />

Reflection<br />

CFC<br />

CH 4<br />

Kraftstoffherstellun<br />

Kraftstoffherstellun<br />

NO X


Bibliography and list of sources<br />

Bibliography and list of sources<br />

[14040 2006] International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14040: Environmental Management – Life Cycle<br />

Assessment – Principles and Framework. 2nd ed.. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.<br />

[Bossdorf-Zimmer et al. 2005] Bossdorf-Zimmer, B.; Rosenau-Tornow, D.; Krinke, S.: Successful Life Cycle Management:<br />

Assessment of Automotive Coating Technologies. Vortrag auf der Challenges for Industrial Production 2005.<br />

Karlsruhe: Institut für Industriebetriebslehre und Industrielle Produktion der TU Karlsruhe.<br />

[EU2001] Directive 2001/100/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 December 2001 amending<br />

Council Directive 70/220/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on measures to be taken<br />

against air pollution by emissions from motor vehicles<br />

[EU 2004] Directive 2004/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending<br />

Council Directives 70/156/EEC and 80/1268/EEC as regards the measurement of carbon dioxide emissions and<br />

fuel consumption of N1 vehicles<br />

[EU 2008] Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing and amending Regulation<br />

(EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect<br />

to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and<br />

maintenance information<br />

[Guinée and Lindeijer 2002] Guinée, J. B.; Lindeijer, E.: Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational guide to<br />

the ISO standards. Dordrecht [et al.]: Kluwer Academic Publishers.<br />

[Koffler et al. 2007] Koffler, C.; Krinke, S.; Schebek, L.; Buchgeister, J.: <strong>Volkswagen</strong> slimLCI – a procedure for stream-<br />

lined inventory modelling within Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of vehicles. In: International Journal of Vehicle Design<br />

(Special Issue on Sustainable Mobility, Vehicle Design and Development). Olney: Inderscience Publishers (in press).<br />

[Krinke et al. 2005a] Krinke, S.; Bossdorf-Zimmer, B.; Goldmann, D.: Ökobilanz Altfahrzeugrecycling – Vergleich<br />

des VW-SiCon-Verfahrens und der Demontage von Kunststoffbauteilen mit nachfolgender werkstofflicher<br />

Verwertung. Wolfsburg: <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>. Available on the Internet at www.volkswagen-umwelt.de<br />

[Krinke et al. 2005b] Krinke, S.; Nannen, H.; Degen, W.; Hoffmann, R.; Rudloff, M.; Baitz, M.: SunDiesel – a new<br />

promising biofuel for sustainable mobility. Presentation at the 2nd Life-Cycle Management Conference Barcelona.<br />

Available on the Internet at www.etseq.urv.es/aga/lcm2005/99_pdf/Documentos/AE12-2.pdf<br />

[PE International 2003] PE International GmbH: GaBi 4.2 Datenbank-Dokumentation. Leinfelden-Echterdingen:<br />

PE International GmbH.<br />

[Schmidt et al. 2004] Schmidt, W. P.; Dahlquist, E.; Finkbeiner, M.; Krinke, S.; Lazzari, S.; Oschmann, D.; Pichon, S.;<br />

Thiel, C.: Life Cycle Assessent of Lightweight and End-Of-Life Scenarios for Generic Compact Class Vehicles. In:<br />

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (6), pp. 405-416.<br />

[Schweimer 1998] Schweimer, G. W.: Sachbilanz des 3-Liter-Lupo. Wolfsburg: <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>.<br />

[Schweimer et al. 1999] Schweimer, G. W.; Bambl, T.; Wolfram, H.: Sachbilanz des SEAT Ibiza. Wolfsburg:<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>.<br />

[Schweimer und Levin 2000] Schweimer, G. W.; Levin, M.: Sachbilanz des Golf A4. Wolfsburg: <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>.<br />

[Schweimer und Roßberg 2001] Schweimer, G. W.; Roßberg, A.: Sachbilanz des SEAT Leon. Wolfsburg:<br />

<strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>.<br />

[Schweimer und Schuckert 1996] Schweimer, G. W.; Schuckert, M.: Sachbilanz eines Golf. VDI-Bericht 1307:<br />

Ganzheitliche Betrachtungen im Automobilbau. Wolfsburg: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI).<br />

[<strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong> 2007a] <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>: The Passat – environmental commendation, Wolfsburg: <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>.<br />

Im Internet unter www.umweltpraedikat.de<br />

[<strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong> 2007b] <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>: The Golf – Environmental Commendation, Wolfsburg: <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong>.<br />

Im Internet unter www.umweltprädikat.de<br />

[VDA 1997] Verband der deutschen Automobilindustrie (VDA): VDA 231-106: VDA-Werkstoffblatt: Werkstoff-<br />

klassifizierung im Kraftfahrzeugbau – Aufbau und Nomenklatur. Frankfurt: Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V.<br />

46


List of abbreviationss<br />

List of abbreviations<br />

AP Acidification potential<br />

CFC Chlorofluorocarbons<br />

CH4 Methane<br />

CML Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden (Centre for Environmental Sciences, Netherlands)<br />

CO Carbon monoxide<br />

CO2 Carbon dioxide<br />

DIN Deutsche Industrienorm (German Industrial Standard)<br />

DPF Diesel particulate filter<br />

DSG Dual-clutch gearbox<br />

EDW Einwohnerdurchschnittswert (average impact per inhabitant)<br />

EN European standard<br />

EP Eutrophication potential<br />

GJ Gigajoule<br />

GWP Global warming potential<br />

HC Hydrocarbons<br />

KBA Kraftfahrtbundesamt (Federal Motor Transport Authority)<br />

kW Kilowatt<br />

LCA Life Cycle Assessment<br />

LCI Life Cycle Inventory<br />

MISS Material Information System<br />

MPI Intake-tube multipoint injection gasoline engine<br />

N2O Nitrous oxide<br />

NEDC New European Driving Cycle<br />

NH3 Ammonia<br />

Nm Newton metre<br />

NMVOC Non-methane volatile organic compounds (hydrocarbons without methane)<br />

NOX Nitrogen oxides<br />

ODP Ozone depletion potential<br />

PAN Peroxyacetylnitrate<br />

PO4 Phosphate<br />

POCP Photochemical ozone creation potential<br />

ppm Parts per million<br />

PVC Polyvinyl chloride<br />

R11 Trichlorofluoromethane (CCl3F)<br />

SET Simultaneous engineering team<br />

SF6 Sulphur hexafluoride<br />

SO2 Sulphur dioxide<br />

TDI Turbocharged direct injection diesel engine<br />

TSI Turbocharged direct injection petrol engine<br />

VDA Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (Association of the German Automotive Industry)<br />

VOC Volatile organic compounds<br />

47


List of figures and tables<br />

List of figures<br />

Figure 1: Environmental goals of the Technical Development department of the <strong>Volkswagen</strong> brand . . 7<br />

Figure 2: Input and output flows for a Life Cycle Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8<br />

Figure 3: Procedure for impact assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9<br />

Figure 4: Dismantling study of the Golf V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

Figure 5: Process of modelling an entire vehicle with the VW slimLCI interface system . . . . . . . . .11<br />

Figure 6: Scope of the Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14<br />

Figure 7: Excerpt from the model structure of the Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG ® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />

Figure 8: Material composition of Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21<br />

Figure 9: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23<br />

Figure 10: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24<br />

Figure 11: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf V 1.6 MPI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25<br />

Figure 12: Life Cycle Inventory data for Golf VI 1.6 MPI with DSG ® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26<br />

Figure 13: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF and Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />

Figure 14: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF and Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF (relative). . . . . . . 28<br />

Figure 15: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.9 TDI DPF and Golf VI 2.0 TDI DPF (detail) . . . . . . . 29<br />

Figure 16: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle – diesel models . . . . . . . . 30<br />

Figure 17: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.6 MPI and Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG ® . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31<br />

Figure 18: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.6 MPI and Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG ® (relative) . . . . . . . 32<br />

Figure 19: Environmental impacts of Golf V 1.6 MPI and Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG ® (detail) . . . . . . . . . 33<br />

Figure 20: Comparison of environmental impacts over the full life cycle – petrol models . . . . . . . . 34<br />

Figure 21: Contribution of different disciplines to the global warming potential generated<br />

by production of the Golf VI 1.6 MPI DSG ® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35<br />

Figure 22: End-of-life vehicle treatment with the VW SiCon process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />

Figure 23: Selective processing of the material fractions from the VW SiCon process . . . . . . . . . 38<br />

Figure 24: Life Cycle Assessment of the VW SiCon process compared<br />

with the dismantling of plastic parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39<br />

List of tables<br />

Table 1: Technical data of vehicles assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />

Table 2: Average impact per inhabitant figures in the EU 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15<br />

Table 3: Emission limits in accordance with Euro 4 and Euro 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />

Table 4: Fuel consumption and emissions of vehicles assessed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18<br />

Table 5: Assumptions and definitions for the Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19<br />

Table 6: Material composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22<br />

48


© <strong>Volkswagen</strong> <strong>AG</strong><br />

Konzernforschung Umwelt Produkt<br />

Brieffach 011/1774<br />

38436 Wolfsburg<br />

September 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!