Beyond Greening - Tourism Watch

Beyond Greening: Reflections on Tourism in the Rio-Process | PositioningpaperSustainable Consumption and Production in Tourism – Quo Vadis?Private Sector Initiatives and Corporate Social ResponsibilityBy Jennifer SeifSustainable consumption and production (SCP) is a cornerstone of the Rio+20 process andongoing efforts to promote a more equitable and greener global economy (UN, 2012).Successes achieved in a wide range of sectors – notably agriculture, forestry and marineproducts, textiles and other forms of manufacturing – are based on a range of policyinstruments including voluntary standards, corporate social responsibility (CSR) tools,sustainable/ethical supply chain management practices and sustainability labels. Someinstruments are targeted at the private sector (B2B) while others aim to encourage moreinformed decision-making by consumers when purchasing goods and services.Efforts to stimulate SCP in travel and tourism follow similar trajectories. Despite notablesuccess stories at firm and destination levels, the net impact of tourism initiatives remainslimited. Less than one percent of all beds in Europe carry any type of sustainability label(Goodwin, 2007), and the percentage of international arrivals that can be categorised as“responsible travel” is much less (TripAdvisor, 2009).The value-action gap in sustainable tourism (the difference between what travellers aspire toand how they actually spend their money) is not yet well understood empirically, and moredetailed market segmentation and consumer insight is needed. Competition betweenhundreds of sustainable tourism standards, certification schemes and voluntary codes ofconduct risks industry fatigue, consumer confusion and ultimately dilution of market anddevelopment impact. Strong emphasis on the “green” aspects of tourism over the past decadeor so must be balanced with equal attention to labour standards, human rights and trade andclimate justice.This article focuses on sustainability standards and labels as tools to promote SCP in traveland tourism and argues for improved coordination, not only between standards-setting andcertification organisations but between the growing numbers of accreditation systemscurrently being designed to professionalise and harmonise the sustainable tourismcertification services sector. Accreditation is evolving into the “next big thing” in tourismcertification and its implementation must avoid rather than repeat the problems it aims toaddress.Tourism sustainability standards and labels – current state of playThere are currently some 150+ sustainability standards and certificates targeting the travel andtourism industry (Bien, 2011). Some schemes are international or regional in scope while themajority operate nationally, targeting accommodation, tour operators and other businesses indestinations. Most systems are owned and operated privately, often by NGOs, which is aresult of the low barriers to entry that have pertained in the sector over the past decades.In addition to low barriers to entry, destination-specific imperatives coupled with a “do itourselves” mentality have resulted in a proliferation of schemes across the globe, operatinglargely in isolation from one another. Most if not all schemes struggle with the samechallenges: financial sustainability, low market penetration and a lack of evidence to illustratethe business and development cases for certification. Moreover, many schemes arecharacterised by weak governance procedures and there is a tendency to combine certification66