<strong>Uranium</strong> <strong>ore</strong>-<strong>forming</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake Frome regionWe have not considered changes in permeabilities and porosities that might have resulted from <strong>the</strong>reaction between fluids and rocks (cf. Cleverley, 2008).7.2.3.3 Boundary conditions and model variationsThe model was uniformly saturated with fluid, with uninterruptible fluid supply at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>model. The top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model was fixed at atmospheric pressure (~1 MPa) and 25°C. The initialpressure-temperature conditions were based on hydrostatic pressures and a geo<strong>the</strong>rmal gradient <strong>of</strong>60°/km (drillhole Paralana 1B recorded 109°C at ~1,807 m; Petra<strong>the</strong>rm, 2007). The base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>model was maintained at constant temperature, determined by <strong>the</strong> initial geo<strong>the</strong>rmal gradient. Noadditional heat flow was specified at <strong>the</strong> base or sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model. For <strong>the</strong> MPI we havespecified a radiogenic heat production <strong>of</strong> 0.00308 x 10 6 W/kg (Neumann, pers. comm., 2008), butthis heat production has not noticeably perturbed <strong>the</strong> average geo<strong>the</strong>rmal gradient for <strong>the</strong> initialtemperature conditions. The sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model were open, and <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model was closedwith respect to fluid flow.The main set <strong>of</strong> models was run without fluid overpressure within <strong>the</strong> Cadna-owie Formation(Figs. 7.4 to 7.8). However, it is well known that groundwaters in <strong>the</strong> Cadna-owie Formation arecurrently overpressured, as evident from <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> active mound springs in <strong>the</strong> region andartesian water in aquifers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GAB (e.g., Radke et al., 2000). To illustrate <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> thisphenomenon on <strong>the</strong> overall structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluid flow model within Pliocene-Pleistocene epochs, aseparate model was created with fluid overpressure (Fig. 7.9) within <strong>the</strong> Cadna-owie Formation,accounting for <strong>the</strong> westward fluid flow at ~1 m y 1 .Routine models were run without reactive-transport but with an added tracer (a non-reactivecomponent dissolved in hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal fluids) to investigate <strong>the</strong> hydrodynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system inresponse to changes in geometrical (<strong>the</strong> topography and structure) and permeability parameters. In<strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> “single-domain” MPI models, <strong>the</strong> tracer was initially distributed exclusively within <strong>the</strong>coherent MPI rocks on both sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Paralana Fault (Figs. 7.4D to 7.7D); within <strong>the</strong> “layereddomain”models, <strong>the</strong> tracer was introduced exclusively within <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>red layer (Figs. 7.7D,7.8D). In both cases, <strong>the</strong> initial concentration <strong>of</strong> tracer within <strong>the</strong> fluid was specified at <strong>the</strong> 10mol kg 1 level. The geochemical rationale behind this approach was to trace <strong>the</strong> fluids from <strong>the</strong>rocks that are <strong>the</strong> assumed sources <strong>of</strong> uranium (granitic rocks, and oxidized granitic rocks,respectively).7.2.4 Representation <strong>of</strong> results – fluid flow modellingTo summarise output results from <strong>the</strong> numerous modelling runs and to facilitate visualcomparison, we present results as follows (Figs. 7.4 to 7.9). Table 7.1 summarises <strong>the</strong> variableschanged throughout <strong>the</strong> presented model set. For each model under discussion, we show plotswith distribution <strong>of</strong> (a) permeabilities, (b) temperatures, (c) instantaneous Darcy fluxes, and(d) distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tracer. Additionally, plots (a), (b), and (d) show fluid flowlines, but plot (c)shows <strong>the</strong> instantaneous Darcy fluxes and vectors to clearly identify <strong>the</strong> regions where <strong>the</strong> mostfluid flow occurs. All <strong>the</strong> plots are compiled for <strong>the</strong> same time slice (or close time slices fordifferent models, around 10,000 years). The notional locations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Four Mile East and Beverleydeposits are shown in Fig. 7.3.Page 85 <strong>of</strong> 151
<strong>Uranium</strong> <strong>ore</strong>-<strong>forming</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake Frome regionTable 7.1: Values <strong>of</strong> permeabilities and fluid fluxes changed throughout <strong>the</strong> presented fluid-flowmodel set.Figure(model)Permeability (m 2 )2 Imposedfluid flux(m y 1 )7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9Paralana Fault 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-12 n/a 1.E-13 1.E-13Eastern Fault 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-16 to 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13Western Fault 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-16 to 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-131 Willawortina 1.E-15 1.E-15 1.E-15 1.E-15 1.E-15 1.E-15FormationNamba1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16FormationEyre1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-14 1.E-13 1.E-13FormationBulldog Shale 1.E-17 1.E-17 1.E-17 1.E-17 1.E-17 1.E-17Cadna-owie 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13 1.E-13FormationNeoproterozoic 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-16AdelaideanMt Painter(wea<strong>the</strong>red)n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.E-15 1.E-15Mt Painter 1.E-17 1.E-16 1.E-16 1.E-17 1.E-1611 Permeability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Willawortina Formation artificially suppressed to compensate for <strong>the</strong> current inability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>PmdPyRT code to handle unsaturated fluid flow.2 Westward fluid flow within <strong>the</strong> Cadna-owie Formation.7.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION – FLUID FLOW MODELLING7.3.1 Fluid flow scenarios in <strong>the</strong> Beverley – Four Mile districtFisher et al. (2008) pioneered <strong>the</strong> reactive transport modeling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sandstonehosteduranium mineralisation inspired by <strong>the</strong> Frome Embayment scenario. Initially <strong>the</strong>y useda generic geological model with a 2D cross-section cutting across a broad, 8-km wide,paleochannel hosted by basin rocks <strong>of</strong> similar permeabilities. Once m<strong>ore</strong>, <strong>the</strong> fluid flow within <strong>the</strong>model was topographically driven to <strong>the</strong> east, away from U-enriched granites <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MPI. Thepalaeochannel, hosted by oxidized basin rocks, served as a “local” reduction trap for uraniniferousfluids. Although Fisher et al. (2008) proceeded to m<strong>ore</strong> “realistic” layered geometries at <strong>the</strong>expense <strong>of</strong> detailed structure in <strong>the</strong> paleochannel, <strong>the</strong>ir initial approach emphasized <strong>the</strong> potentialimportance <strong>of</strong> local chemical heterogeneities within o<strong>the</strong>rwise hydraulically homogeneous rocks.Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>ir 2D approach suffered from <strong>the</strong> assumption <strong>of</strong> fluid flow across, ra<strong>the</strong>r thanalong, paleochannels.The results <strong>of</strong> both Fisher et al. (2008) and <strong>the</strong> current study show that <strong>the</strong> relative permeabilities<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock units are <strong>the</strong> fundamental control on fluid flow and fluid fluxes. Potential energyrepresented by topography drives fluid flow in <strong>the</strong> models in both studies.In our study, despite somewhat different patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluid flow depicted in Figures 7.3 to 7.8,most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluid flow occurs within <strong>the</strong> Eyre Formation. Overall, <strong>the</strong> eastward paleo fluid-flowpattern reproduced in <strong>the</strong> models within Cenozoic sediments is similar to <strong>the</strong> one suggested byHeathgate Resources (1998) and Brugger et al. (2005) (e.g., Figure 7.3). However, our resultsPage 86 <strong>of</strong> 151