13.07.2015 Views

Uranium ore-forming systems of the - Geoscience Australia

Uranium ore-forming systems of the - Geoscience Australia

Uranium ore-forming systems of the - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Uranium</strong> <strong>ore</strong>-<strong>forming</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake Frome regionAbstractCenozoic basins <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake Frome region in South <strong>Australia</strong> contain most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation’s knownresources <strong>of</strong> sandstone-hosted uranium mineralisation. In addition to <strong>the</strong> currently operatingBeverley uranium mine, two o<strong>the</strong>r deposits have been approved for mining (Honeymoon, FourMile East), and discoveries continue to be made in <strong>the</strong> region (e.g., Pepegoona; HeathgateResources, announcement September 2009). While <strong>the</strong> known resources are significant, <strong>the</strong>potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region for very large uranium deposits has not been well understood, in part due tolimited knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional- and district-scale geological controls on uraniummineralisation.The multidisciplinary study reported herein applies a ‘mineral <strong>systems</strong>’ approach to identify andmap <strong>the</strong> principal geological controls on <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> known uranium mineralisation in <strong>the</strong> LakeFrome region. This new framework is aimed at providing a basis for refined exploration targeting<strong>of</strong> areas with potential for major undiscovered deposits, thus reducing risk in investment by <strong>the</strong>exploration industry.Mineral <strong>systems</strong> approach – Major <strong>ore</strong> deposits are <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> crustal- to deposit- to microscalegeological processes, and require <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> (a) suitable sources <strong>of</strong> metals, fluids(aqueous, magmas, etc), ligands (for hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal deposits), sulfur (for sulfide deposits), (b)permeable pathways or permeability architecture for transport <strong>of</strong> metals and for focussing andoutflow <strong>of</strong> fluids, (c) energy sources to drive <strong>the</strong> <strong>ore</strong>-<strong>forming</strong> system, and (d) chemical and/orphysical depositional gradients where <strong>the</strong> <strong>ore</strong> metals are precipitated. Suitable sources,permeability architecture, and physico-chemical gradients occur only in specific ‘fertile’ terranesthat have experienced favourable geodynamic and tectonic evolution, and where <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong>geological events permits an efficient physical link (permeability architecture) between <strong>the</strong>sources regions and <strong>the</strong> <strong>ore</strong> depositional environments. The present study aims to identify and map<strong>the</strong> geological ‘proxies’ (i.e., observable geological features) for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four mineral systemcomponents. In addition, successful exploration for major uranium or o<strong>the</strong>r deposits requires that<strong>the</strong> deposits are preserved at depths accessible to exploration methods.Sources <strong>of</strong> U, fluids, ligands – It is widely assumed <strong>the</strong> uranium was sourced from <strong>the</strong> uraniumrichProterozoic basement in <strong>the</strong> region, or from sediments derived from such basement. TheBeverley deposit is hosted by sands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oligocene-Miocene Namba Formation, whereas <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r known deposits in <strong>the</strong> region are hosted by sands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eocene Eyre Formation. Here wepresent an hypo<strong>the</strong>sis for leaching <strong>of</strong> uranium from basement as it was exhumed during threemajor episodes <strong>of</strong> uplift since <strong>the</strong> late Mesozoic. The highly oxidised waters required to transportmajor quantities <strong>of</strong> uranium are assumed to have been meteoric waters and groundwaters, whichin our hypo<strong>the</strong>sis were maintained at high oxidation state within zones <strong>of</strong> deeply wea<strong>the</strong>red andoxidised basement.Energy and timing – The occurrence <strong>of</strong> three major uplift episodes and three periods <strong>of</strong> deepwea<strong>the</strong>ring since <strong>the</strong> late Mesozoic may have been crucial for uranium <strong>ore</strong> formation in <strong>the</strong> LakeFrome region. In this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, basement uplift triggered increases in gravitationally-drivenfluid flow through previously deeply wea<strong>the</strong>red U-bearing source rocks and into adjacent basins.Numerical modelling confirms <strong>the</strong> greater fluid fluxes expected for geometries with higher relief(greater potential energy). As a consequence, we infer development <strong>of</strong> three uranium mineral<strong>systems</strong> at different times since <strong>the</strong> late Cretaceous (see below). At least two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> periods <strong>of</strong>uplift were probably an intracontinental response to changes in motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>n platesince ~40-45 Ma.Permeability architecture – Permeable pathways for U-bearing fluids potentially include fracturedand wea<strong>the</strong>red basement, faults, and primary and secondary permeability within sediments andPage 1 <strong>of</strong> 151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!