13.07.2015 Views

Uranium ore-forming systems of the - Geoscience Australia

Uranium ore-forming systems of the - Geoscience Australia

Uranium ore-forming systems of the - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Uranium</strong> <strong>ore</strong>-<strong>forming</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake Frome regionFigure 4.6: Plan view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> voxet model showing <strong>the</strong> redox patterns on each lithological surface in<strong>the</strong> EL 5/6 area.4.4.3 Distribution patterns <strong>of</strong> selected materials in ELs 5 and 6In order to better understand <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> redox patterns, and relationships between redox,lithology and permeability, information on <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> particular minerals, rock types andsediment grain size sand was extracted from <strong>the</strong> drill logs. The spatial distribution <strong>of</strong>carbonaceous material, lignite, pyrite, hematite and limonite was mapped in 3D, along with dataon <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> gravel, pebbles and carbonate. Two-dimensional plan projections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>results are shown in Figures 4.7 and 4.8. Results for <strong>the</strong> Namba Formation are shown in Figure4.7. At top left <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> figure, <strong>the</strong> redox patterns define a semi-continous zone <strong>of</strong> reduced materials(blue) trending broadly north-south in <strong>the</strong> central-eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area, resembling apaleochannel. However, <strong>the</strong> distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selected redox-sensitive materials in Figure 4.7(carbonaceous material, lignite, pyrite, hematite and limonite) only partly match <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>possible paleochannel. One possible reason for this apparent lack <strong>of</strong> spatial correlation is that notall materials and criteria listed in Table 4.1 are shown in Figures 4.7 and 4.8. For example, <strong>the</strong>colour criteria in Table 4.1 are not illustrated in Figure 4.7. Carbonaceous material occurs in <strong>the</strong>sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inferred paleochannel, whereas limonite appears to negatively correlate with<strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduced zones. The distribution <strong>of</strong> sand versus gravel potentially maycorrelate with <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> paleochannels, but this is not evident in <strong>the</strong> data. Silt and clay (notshown in Fig. 4.7) are <strong>the</strong> dominant constituents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Namba Formation, whereas sand issporadic and gravel and pebbles are uncommon.Results for <strong>the</strong> Eyre Formation show a correlation between <strong>the</strong> redox pattern and <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong>carbonaceous material (Fig. 4.8). Pyrite and lignite are less widespread but contribute to <strong>the</strong> broadextent <strong>of</strong> reduced zones in <strong>the</strong> Eyre Formation. Restricted oxidised zones correlate partly with <strong>the</strong>presence <strong>of</strong> hematite and limonite. Sand is ubiquitous within this formation and gravel andpebbles are also common. Carbonate materials are mostly restricted to <strong>the</strong> south-west corner <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> area.Page 50 <strong>of</strong> 151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!