13.07.2015 Views

introduction to the 2008 nols leadership educator notebook

introduction to the 2008 nols leadership educator notebook

introduction to the 2008 nols leadership educator notebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Group OutcomeTeach conceptual level classes on <strong>to</strong>pics like team dynamics and<strong>leadership</strong> in addition <strong>to</strong> technical skills.Directing is providing <strong>the</strong> more traditional functions of executive<strong>leadership</strong>. This is <strong>leadership</strong> through actively structuring a group,by setting group rules, creating norms for behavior, setting goals,managing time and <strong>the</strong> like. When directing, leaders ei<strong>the</strong>r prescribespecific actions, or <strong>the</strong>y s<strong>to</strong>p specific actions and focus on particularbehaviors or events. In directing mode, you might s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong> groupand suggest <strong>the</strong>y reflect on something that just happened. Comparethis with conceptualizing, where you might also s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong> group andfocus on an event, but you would likely add your interpretation of<strong>the</strong> event. Directing includes organizing, questioning and choreographingkey events.Example: “Before we start our break, let’s decide how long wewant it <strong>to</strong> be.” Generally groups respond best <strong>to</strong> moderate amountsof directing behavior.Coaching on DirectingHelp students identify situations when <strong>the</strong>y have felt <strong>the</strong>re was<strong>to</strong>o little directing being done by <strong>the</strong> leader, and what <strong>the</strong> consequencesof this were. Then ask <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> reflect on situations with <strong>to</strong>omuch directing being and what happened.Ask students <strong>to</strong> identify cues which help <strong>the</strong>m know <strong>the</strong>y are doing<strong>the</strong> “right” amount of directing.Acknowledge that <strong>the</strong> optimal amount of directing varies—itchanges as <strong>the</strong> group and <strong>the</strong> situation change!There are an infinite number of different aspects of <strong>leadership</strong> youcan coach students on! These are just four <strong>to</strong> help get you started.Group Outcomehighmediumlowhighmediumlowlow medium highdegree of CONCEPTUALIZINGbehavior expressedlow medium highdegree of DIRECTINGbehavior expressedSELF-DIFFERENTIATED LEADERSHIPThis is <strong>the</strong> idea that real <strong>leadership</strong> comes about when you begin<strong>to</strong> view yourself and your followers as a system that functions aspart of one ano<strong>the</strong>r. The <strong>the</strong>ory of self-differentiated <strong>leadership</strong> isall about what makes someone a mature, special leader. Being yourau<strong>the</strong>ntic self is what matters: this means your actions are alignedwith your values.Well-differentiated, emotionally mature individuals, who bringa lot of “self” <strong>to</strong> any relationship we call “self-differentiated”. Thesepeople are comfortable being who <strong>the</strong>y are and saying or doing what<strong>the</strong>y think <strong>the</strong>y need <strong>to</strong> say or do in any relationship. Highly selfdifferentiatedleaders maintain a good level of emotional calm evenwhen people are disagreeing with <strong>the</strong>m or resisting <strong>the</strong>ir ideas. Theykeep things in perspective, seeing both paradox and humor in <strong>the</strong>mselvesand life. They can be very emotional—but <strong>the</strong>y have morechoice about it. People generally have better, more truly connectedrelationships, make better choices and are more effective leaderswhen <strong>the</strong>y have greater self-differentiation (Kerr, 1988).Self-differentiated individuals are inter-dependant, not isolatedand independent. It is arguable that students need high self-differentiation<strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>the</strong>ir friends on extended camping trips.At most, we may only get students <strong>to</strong> understand <strong>the</strong>ir ability <strong>to</strong>state what <strong>the</strong>y think, feel and want and <strong>the</strong>ir ability <strong>to</strong> stay connectedand seek input from <strong>the</strong>ir group.Chapter II References and Resources• Bennis, W. (1995). On Becoming a Leader. NY: Addison-Wesley.• Blanchard, K. (1999). Leadership and <strong>the</strong> one minute manager.• Block, P. (1993). Stewardship. SF, CA: Berrett-Koehler.• Deluga, R. J. (1992). The Relationship of Leader-Member Exchangeswith Laissez-Faire, Transformational and TransactionalLeadership on Naval Environments. Impact of Leadership. NorthCarolina, Center for Creative Leadership.• French, J., Jr., and Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power.In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, MI:Institute for Social Research.• Friedman, E.H. (1985). Generation <strong>to</strong> Generation. NY: Guilford.• Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1963). Organizational Behavior.(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.• Hesselbein, F., Goldsmith, M., & Beckhard, R., (1996). Leaderof <strong>the</strong> Future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.• Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (1987). Joining Toge<strong>the</strong>r: Group Theoryand Group Skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.• Kerr, M and Bowen, M. (1988). Family Evaluation. New York,NY: W.W. Nor<strong>to</strong>n and Company, Inc.• Lieberman, M., Yalom, I., & Miles, M. (1973). Encounter Groups:First Facts. Basic Books.• Schultz, W. (1975). Not Encounter and Certainly Not Facts. Journalof Humanistic Psychology, 7-18.• Senge, P. (1994). The Fifth Discipline. NY, NY: Currency andDoubleday.• Short, R. (1991). A Special Kind of Leadership. Seattle, WA: TheLeadership Group.• S<strong>to</strong>gill R. (1974). Handbook of Leadership. NY, NY: Free Press.• Yalom, I. (1975). How effective is <strong>the</strong> encounter group? The Theoryand Practice of Group Psycho<strong>the</strong>rapy, (2nd ed.), 471-478.<strong>2008</strong> NOLS Leadership Educa<strong>to</strong>r Notebook 15Defining Leadership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!