Decision on prosecution motion for admission of evidence of ... - ICTY
Decision on prosecution motion for admission of evidence of ... - ICTY
Decision on prosecution motion for admission of evidence of ... - ICTY
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12179that the tendered <strong>evidence</strong> is relevant, has probative value, and is appropriate <strong>for</strong> admissi<strong>on</strong>pursuant to Rules 89(C) and 92 ter.7. The challenged porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the proposed statement relate to a meeting the witness had withArkan and Goran Hadžić in Belgrade in September 1991 during which Arkan and Hadžić <strong>of</strong>feredthe witness exclusive rights to cover the war in Eastern Slav<strong>on</strong>ia in exchange <strong>for</strong> “n<strong>on</strong>-militarymaterial” from the witness’s televisi<strong>on</strong> network. The witness reported that during the meetingArkan said that he did not take pris<strong>on</strong>ers. The witness also included his impressi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> therelati<strong>on</strong>ship between Arkan and Hadžić. The Chamber c<strong>on</strong>siders that the <strong>evidence</strong> is not <strong>of</strong> suchsensitivity and importance that it is inappropriate to be admitted in written <strong>for</strong>m, notes that theDefence will have the opportunity to test the witness in relati<strong>on</strong> to the in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tained withinthese paragraphs during cross-examinati<strong>on</strong>, and finds that it is appropriate <strong>for</strong> admissi<strong>on</strong> pursuant toRule 92 ter.12 Stanišić and Župljanin <str<strong>on</strong>g>Decisi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, para. 19; Luki} and Luki} <str<strong>on</strong>g>Decisi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, para. 20; ðorđevi} <str<strong>on</strong>g>Decisi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, para. 6; Haraqijaand Morina <str<strong>on</strong>g>Decisi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, para. 13.3Case No. IT-04-75-T 25 June 2013