The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In addition, because of funds made available to the ICAC program through the AmericanReinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) (Public Law 111-5) OJJDP made two grant awards toeach of the Task Forces. 87 The Table below shows the FY 2009 ARRA Award and the FY 2009Continuation Grant made to each Task Force.Federal Grants Awarded to ICAC Task Forces in FY 2009 (N=61)State Agency FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2009 TotalFunding ARRAAlabama Alabama Bureau of Investigation $318,423.00 $652,884.00 $971,307.00Alaska Anchorage Police Department $200,000.00 $437,265.00 $637,265.00Arizona Phoenix Police Department $427,898.00 $824,004.00 $1,251,902.00Arkansas Arkansas State Police $298,451.00 $580,983.00 $879,434.00California San Jose Police Department $437,594.00 $863,930.00 $1,301,524.00California San Diego Police Department $348,774.00 $708,238.00 $1,057,012.00California Fresno County Sheriff's Office $297,488.00 $607,097.00 $904,585.00California Los Angeles Police Department $709,836.00 $1,350,900.00 $2,060,736.00California Sacramento County Sheriff’s $344,321.00 $702,838.00 $1,047,159.00OfficeColorado Colorado Springs Police $332,111.00 $675,991.00 $1,008,102.00DepartmentConnecticut Connecticut State Police $283,345.00 $584,975.00 $868,320.00Delaware Delaware Department of Justice $200,000.00 $437,109.00 $637,109.00Florida Broward County Sheriff’s Office $474,066.00 $881,389.00 $1,355,455.00Florida Gainesville Police Department $371,537.00 $729,688.00 $1,101,225.00Florida Polk County Sheriff's Office $448,962.00 $837,551.00 $1,286,513.00Georgia Georgia Bureau of Investigation $491,879.00 $947,058.00 $1,438,937.00Hawaii Hawaii Department of Attorney $250,000.00 $463,917.00 $713,917.00GeneralIdaho Idaho Office of Attorney $205,000.00 $454,294.00 $659,294.00GeneralIllinois Illinois Office of Attorney $426,569.00 $832,822.00 $1,259,391.00GeneralIllinois Cook County State's Attorney's $341,689.00 $696,224.00 $1,037,913.00OfficeIndiana Indiana State Police $405,491.00 $793,329.00 $1,198,820.00Iowa Iowa Division of Criminal $295,980.00 $574,077.00 $870,057.00InvestigationKansas Sedgwick County Sheriff’s $267,889.00 $557,551.00 $825,440.00OfficeKentucky Kentucky State Police $329,569.00 $652,491.00 $982,060.00Louisiana Louisiana Department of Justice $300,523.00 $623,474.00 $923,997.00Maine Maine State Police $205,000.00 $455,239.00 $660,239.00Maryland Maryland State Police $340,226.00 $688,800.00 $1,029,026.00Massachusetts Massachusetts State Police $397,831.00 $774,492.00 $1,172,323.0087 The New York City and Pasadena Independent School District Task Forces received only one award in FY 2009,as they did not exist when ARRA awards were made in May-June, 2009.65
State Agency FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2009 TotalFunding ARRAMichigan Michigan State Police $567,228.00 $1,094,876.00 $1,662,104.00MinnesotaMississippi$355,826.00$238,389.00$701,346.00$514,677.00$1,057,172.00 $753,066.00MissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew Hampshire New JerseyNew Mexico New YorkNew YorkNorthCarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasTexasTexasUtahVermontVirginiaSt. Paul Police DepartmentMississippi Office of AttorneyGeneralGlendale Police DepartmentBillings Police DepartmentNebraska State PatrolLas Vegas Metropolitan PoliceDepartmentPortsmouth Police DepartmentNew Jersey State PoliceNew Mexico Attorney General'sOfficeNew York State PoliceNew York City PoliceDepartmentNorth Carolina State Bureau ofInvestigationNorth Dakota Bureau of Criminal InvestigationCuyahoga County Prosecutor’sOfficeOklahoma State Bureau ofInvestigationOregon Department of JusticeDelaware County District Attorney’s Office Rhode Island State PoliceSouth Carolina Attorney General’s Office South Dakota Division of Criminal InvestigationKnoxville Police DepartmentDallas Police DepartmentPasadena Independent SchoolDistrict PDOffice of the Attorney Generalof TexasUtah Office of AttorneyGeneralBurlington Police DepartmentBedford County Sheriff’sOffice66 $385,454.00$200,000.00$219,969.00$274,276.00$215,000.00$463,399.00$228,550.00$373,050.00$500,000.00$458,299.00$200,000.00$586,566.00$318,221.00$327,108.00$596,512.00$205,000.00$357,072.00$210,000.00$384,286.00$392,624.00$500,000.00$343,321.00$268,806.00$200,000.00$349,038.00$733,895.00$422,046.00$481,092.00$566,519.00$475,306.00$901,077.00$488,527.00$1,618,399.00$0.00$879,040.00$413,449.00$1,122,272.00$635,360.00$655,983.00$1,084,541.00$452,438.00$687,278.00$444,133.00$748,510.00$776,503.00$0.00$1,479,163.00$539,879.00$437,282.00$681,572.00$1,119,349.00 $622,046.00$701,061.00 $840,795.00$690,306.00 $1,364,476.00$717,077.00 $1,991,449.00$500,000.00 $1,337,339.00$613,449.00 $1,708,838.00$953,581.00 $983,091.00$1,681,053.00 $657,438.00$1,044,350.00 $654,133.00$1,132,796.00 $1,169,127.00$500,000.00 $1,822,484.00$808,685.00 $637,282.00$1,030,610.00
Page 1:
U.S. Department of Justice
Page 5 and 6:
4. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFIC
Page 7 and 8:
V. CONCLUSION .....................
Page 9 and 10:
amount of information, including: (
Page 12 and 13:
assisting state, local, tribal and
Page 14 and 15:
goals that can provide some measura
Page 16 and 17:
State and federal investigators and
Page 18 and 19:
a. Available indicators suggest chi
Page 20 and 21:
These two applications (Fairplay, R
Page 22 and 23: The Figure below shows the number o
Page 24 and 25: For FY 2008, ICAC Task Forces repor
Page 26 and 27: Some researchers suggest that viewi
Page 28 and 29: interests in children and their des
Page 31 and 32: could later bediscovered by lawenfo
Page 33 and 34: domains are commercial purveyors of
Page 35 and 36: • The offender communicates with
Page 37 and 38: 1. Online enticement complaints are
Page 39 and 40: elationship. After the child has ga
Page 41 and 42: Influenced and Corrupt Organization
Page 43 and 44: D. Child Sex TourismChild sex touri
Page 45 and 46: Exploitation of Children Today (PRO
Page 47 and 48: A task force model often is employe
Page 49 and 50: The United States Attorney’s offi
Page 51 and 52: FBI and CEOS, in conjunction with N
Page 53 and 54: The effects of child sex tourism re
Page 55 and 56: 352 investigations and 162 charged
Page 57 and 58: • CEOS worked closely with NDIC i
Page 59 and 60: • Alameda County, CA, Children's
Page 61 and 62: • Additional data have been submi
Page 63 and 64: postsentence persons and civilly co
Page 65 and 66: B. A Review of the Internet Crimes
Page 67 and 68: • Providing training and technica
Page 69 and 70: Table 1 : ICAC Task Force Agencies
Page 71: State Task Force Agency Number of T
Page 75 and 76: State Agency FY2008#AZCACACACACACOC
Page 77 and 78: Number of Criminal Referrals to Uni
Page 79 and 80: d. Number of local prosecutions and
Page 81 and 82: State Agency FY 2008# of Cases Refe
Page 83 and 84: State Agency FY 2008 Jan.-June 2009
Page 85 and 86: 8. Number and type of ICAC Task For
Page 87 and 88: ICAC Undercover Chat 4 Regional 9.2
Page 89 and 90: has developed highly successful ini
Page 91 and 92: field offices, both domestic and fo
Page 93 and 94: 2. Department of Defense’s Effort
Page 95 and 96: of a mail circular. Since the progr
Page 97 and 98: • The Street Outreach Program fun
Page 99 and 100: the Defense Computer Forensic Labor
Page 101 and 102: • Distributes photographs and des
Page 103 and 104: iii. Enough Is EnoughEnough Is Enou
Page 105 and 106: 1. Overarching Efforts to Coordinat
Page 107 and 108: combine resources and expertise on
Page 109 and 110: United States has submitted annual
Page 111 and 112: CEOS has worked with foreign law en
Page 113 and 114: . Department of Homeland Security
Page 115 and 116: Finally, G/TIP has worked extensive
Page 117 and 118: F. Review of Internet Safety Progra
Page 119 and 120: the accessibility, cost, and effect
Page 121 and 122: activity by predators searching for
Page 123 and 124:
3. Federal Trade Commission and Dep
Page 125 and 126:
Funder: • U.S. Department of Agri
Page 127 and 128:
Delivery: • Online games; printab
Page 129 and 130:
TABLE 1: FEDERALLY FUNDED INTERNET
Page 131 and 132:
Program/Product NameandContactInfor
Page 133 and 134:
TABLE 2: SAMPLE OF PRIVATE NONPROFI
Page 135 and 136:
Program/Product NameProducerFor Kid
Page 137 and 138:
TABLE 1: PARTICIPANT EVALUATIONS OF
Page 139 and 140:
FY 2011. The primary forensics resp
Page 141 and 142:
The DEU is the principal group resp
Page 143 and 144:
CD/DVDs. The CFS has the capability
Page 145 and 146:
First, the Department will continue
Page 147 and 148:
and the Innocence Lost task forces,
Page 149 and 150:
deconflict cases, and share informa
Page 151 and 152:
with the ICACs to help increase the
Page 153 and 154:
from Landslide’s business premise
Page 155 and 156:
victimized children worldwide, incl
Page 157 and 158:
association, was arrested after the
Page 159 and 160:
is transnational in scope; cooperat
Page 161 and 162:
Over the course of their communicat
Page 163 and 164:
An ICE investigation resulted in th
Page 165 and 166:
U.S. v. RichardsonICE PRESS RELEASE
Page 167 and 168:
APPENDIX C THREAT ASSESSMENT: ACADE
Page 169 and 170:
Selected Quotes from Appendix C of
Page 171 and 172:
* * * “Sheldon and Howitt (2007)
Page 173 and 174:
McCarthy, J. and Gaunt, N. (2004).
Page 175 and 176:
high-profile jobs. Some seemed isol
Page 177 and 178:
Trends 2008, http://www.iwf.org.uk/
Page 179 and 180:
Source: National Center for Missing
Page 181 and 182:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FB
Page 183 and 184:
scientific survey process, but rath
Page 185 and 186:
• 42 percent of respondents repor
Page 187 and 188:
The Effect of the Lack of Internet
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
ONLINE ENTICEMENTExtent of Online E
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
• 8 percent of respondents report
Page 199 and 200:
SEX TOURISMNature and ExtentAmong N
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Average Federal and State Sentences
Page 205 and 206:
SOURCESNumerous federal, state, and
Page 207 and 208:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FB
Page 209 and 210:
Southern Texas Utah VermontVirginia
Page 211 and 212:
APPENDIX EDEPARTMENT-FUNDED RESEARC
Page 213 and 214:
victimization. The project has four
Page 215 and 216:
APPENDIX FSYNTHESIS OF MAJOR STUDIE
Page 217 and 218:
17 that among the participants who
Page 219 and 220:
authors, extrapolating survey data,
Page 221 and 222:
officials can gain greater awarenes
Page 223 and 224:
Moessner, Chris. “Cyberbullying.
Page 225 and 226:
The authors of this chapter in a bo
Page 227 and 228:
Wells, Melissa, David Finkelhor, Ja
Page 229 and 230:
The article reports the results of
Page 231 and 232:
system ۛincluding perspectives of
Page 233 and 234:
etween 42 and 44 percent of pornogr
Page 235 and 236:
Reporting the demographic, psycholo
Page 237 and 238:
predator with a victim took place i
Page 239 and 240:
1 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent
Page 241 and 242:
conducted between September 1999 an
Page 243 and 244:
with each grade level, with the per
Page 245 and 246:
Understanding Online Child Pornogra
Page 247 and 248:
focusing on violent (including sexu
Page 249 and 250:
their offending than did Internet o
Page 251 and 252:
trafficking, rape and sexual assaul
Page 253 and 254:
States Postal Inspection Service, 8
Page 255 and 256:
Getting to Grips with Sexual Groomi
Page 257 and 258:
Child Seduction and Self-Representa
Page 259 and 260:
Annotated Bibliography: Child Explo
Page 261 and 262:
Abstract The author discusses teach
Page 263 and 264:
implications for nursing practice i
Page 265 and 266:
providers assisting child victims,
Page 267 and 268:
Problematic Internet Experiences: P
Page 269 and 270:
Online Requests for Sexual Pictures
Page 271 and 272:
Sheldon Kennedy and a Canadian Trag
Page 273 and 274:
people involved in prostitution and
Page 275 and 276:
debates about child labour, exploit
Page 277 and 278:
Abstract The article presents the v
Page 279 and 280:
dealing with sexual offenses agains
show all

The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?