The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction
The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction
The Effects of Organizational and Community Context on Local of CSEC Prevalence,Prosecution of Computer Child Pornography Cases., and Services is a project designed byawardee, Fund for the City of New York. The award has a start date of 9/1/2009 and an end dateof 2/28/2012. The Center for Court Innovation proposes to collaborate with Richard Curtis, KirkDombrowski, and Bilal Khan to conduct a national study that would: (1) estimate the size andscope of the commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC); (2) describe the characteristicsand needs of CSEC victims; (3) explore available services; and (4) analyze prosecution outcomesfor victims and exploiters. The populations of interest would include youth under 18 who areengaged in prostitution, child pornography, or related CSEC activities and those who arecontrolling or profiting from them.Buzzell, T.Criminal Justice Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 391-405, 2007.Abstract: This study examines how U.S. prosecutors deal with the problem of child pornographyas a facet of computer crime. Results from the 2001 National Prosecutors Survey reveal that thelikelihood of prosecuting this form of crime increases with having a budget for experts, usingalternatives to prosecution, and working in districts with higher crime rates and higher levels ofincome. Context therefore matters in the prosecution of computer child pornography cases.Further research is necessary, however, to understand how prosecutors handle advanced forms ofchild sexual exploitation.Mandatory Reporting of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Israel: What Happens After the Report?Oz, Sheri; Balshan, Dorit.Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1 - 22, 2007.Abstract: This study outlined issues of mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse, and theinconsistency of post-report interventions in Israel on children and their families. This papersuggests amendments to the mandatory reporting laws in Israel to better protect all children fromsexual exploitation while providing consistent and expert professional intervention. Althoughstudies have been conducted regarding the impact of mandated reporting laws on professionals,there is a scarcity of research exploring the impact on families and children affected by mandatedreporting. There are several problems regarding mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse inIsrael, namely the differences between sexual abuse and other forms of abuse that need to beaddressed; far fewer allegations of sexual abuse are substantiated in a court of law than physicalabuse or neglect. The tendency of some countries to advocate legal interventions for sexualabuse and therapeutic interventions for other forms of abuse may stem from emotional reactionsto sexual abuse rather than the effectiveness of the legal approach. Therefore, sexual abuseshould be dealt with using a separate law geared to handle the special nature of sexual abuse thatwarrants unique expertise on the part of the professional involved, namely an amendment to thelaw that requires reporting of all cases of suspected sexual abuse regardless of the age of theabuser and the relationship with the victim. So that the mandatory reporting can be an instrumentof change, the separate law should clearly stipulate the procedures to be followed after the reporthas been made and should state the minimal qualifications of an expert in the field of sexualabuse. Future research should include two major issues: the factors associated with disclosure ofabuse and the child s expectations, and the consequences of the disclosure for both the child andfamily members upon implementation of the ensuing legal and/or clinical interventions,including possible differential effects over the long and short terms. Figure, referencesF-52
Problematic Internet Experiences: Primary Or Secondary Presenting Problems In PersonsSeeking Mental Health Care?Mitchell, Kimberly J.; Wells, Melissa.Social Science and Medicine, vol. 65, pp. 1136-1141, Sept. 2007.Abstract: This study utilizes data from clinical reports of 1441 youth and adults in the USA toexamine the types of problematic Internet experiences mental health professionals report asclients' primary or secondary presenting problems. Overall, clients who present in treatment withan Internet problem are more likely to have problems related to overuse of the Internet; use ofadult pornography; use of child pornography; sexual exploitation perpetration; and gaming,gambling, or role-playing. Other Internet-related problems, such as isolative-avoidant use, sexualexploitation victimization, harassment perpetration, and online infidelity were equally likely topresent in treatment as a primary problem or secondary to other mental health concerns. Somedifferences between youth and adult clients were also identified. Findings suggest some initialsupport for the importance of including Internet use, experiences, and behavior as part of aninitial clinical assessment.Youth Sexual Exploitation on the Internet: DSM-IV Diagnoses and Gender Differences in Co-Occurring Mental Health Issues.Wells, M. and Mitchell, K.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24(3), pp. 235-260, 2007.Abstract: This paper explores conventional (non-Internet-related) mental health issues and DSMIV diagnoses seen among a sample of 512 youth receiving mental health services for an Internetrelatedproblem, with particular attention to victims of online sexual exploitation. Youth victimsof online sexual exploitation were more likely to have a post-traumatic stress disorder than youthwith other Internet-related problems. Specific attention was given to differences amongsubgroups of female and male youth victims of online sexual exploitation as compared withsame-gender youth with other Internet-related problems. Findings suggest the importance ofincluding Internet use and victimization as part of a standard clinical assessment.F-53
- Page 215 and 216: APPENDIX FSYNTHESIS OF MAJOR STUDIE
- Page 217 and 218: 17 that among the participants who
- Page 219 and 220: authors, extrapolating survey data,
- Page 221 and 222: officials can gain greater awarenes
- Page 223 and 224: Moessner, Chris. “Cyberbullying.
- Page 225 and 226: The authors of this chapter in a bo
- Page 227 and 228: Wells, Melissa, David Finkelhor, Ja
- Page 229 and 230: The article reports the results of
- Page 231 and 232: system ۛincluding perspectives of
- Page 233 and 234: etween 42 and 44 percent of pornogr
- Page 235 and 236: Reporting the demographic, psycholo
- Page 237 and 238: predator with a victim took place i
- Page 239 and 240: 1 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent
- Page 241 and 242: conducted between September 1999 an
- Page 243 and 244: with each grade level, with the per
- Page 245 and 246: Understanding Online Child Pornogra
- Page 247 and 248: focusing on violent (including sexu
- Page 249 and 250: their offending than did Internet o
- Page 251 and 252: trafficking, rape and sexual assaul
- Page 253 and 254: States Postal Inspection Service, 8
- Page 255 and 256: Getting to Grips with Sexual Groomi
- Page 257 and 258: Child Seduction and Self-Representa
- Page 259 and 260: Annotated Bibliography: Child Explo
- Page 261 and 262: Abstract The author discusses teach
- Page 263 and 264: implications for nursing practice i
- Page 265: providers assisting child victims,
- Page 269 and 270: Online Requests for Sexual Pictures
- Page 271 and 272: Sheldon Kennedy and a Canadian Trag
- Page 273 and 274: people involved in prostitution and
- Page 275 and 276: debates about child labour, exploit
- Page 277 and 278: Abstract The article presents the v
- Page 279 and 280: dealing with sexual offenses agains
<strong>The</strong> Effects of Organizational <strong>and</strong> Community Context on Local of CSEC Prevalence,Prosecution of Computer <strong>Child</strong> Pornography Cases., <strong>and</strong> Services is a project designed byawardee, Fund <strong>for</strong> the City of New York. <strong>The</strong> award has a start date of 9/1/2009 <strong>and</strong> an end dateof 2/28/2012. <strong>The</strong> Center <strong>for</strong> Court Innovation proposes to collaborate with Richard Curtis, KirkDombrowski, <strong>and</strong> Bilal Khan to conduct a national study that would: (1) estimate the size <strong>and</strong>scope of the commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC); (2) describe the characteristics<strong>and</strong> needs of CSEC victims; (3) explore available services; <strong>and</strong> (4) analyze prosecution outcomes<strong>for</strong> victims <strong>and</strong> exploiters. <strong>The</strong> populations of interest would include youth under 18 who areengaged in prostitution, child pornography, or related CSEC activities <strong>and</strong> those who arecontrolling or profiting from them.Buzzell, T.Criminal Justice Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 391-405, 2007.Abstract: This study examines how U.S. prosecutors deal with the problem of child pornographyas a facet of computer crime. Results from the 2001 <strong>National</strong> Prosecutors Survey reveal that thelikelihood of prosecuting this <strong>for</strong>m of crime increases with having a budget <strong>for</strong> experts, usingalternatives to prosecution, <strong>and</strong> working in districts with higher crime rates <strong>and</strong> higher levels ofincome. Context there<strong>for</strong>e matters in the prosecution of computer child pornography cases.Further research is necessary, however, to underst<strong>and</strong> how prosecutors h<strong>and</strong>le advanced <strong>for</strong>ms ofchild sexual exploitation.M<strong>and</strong>atory Reporting of <strong>Child</strong>hood Sexual Abuse in Israel: What Happens After the Report?Oz, Sheri; Balshan, Dorit.Journal of <strong>Child</strong> Sexual Abuse, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1 - 22, 2007.Abstract: This study outlined issues of m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting of child sexual abuse, <strong>and</strong> theinconsistency of post-report interventions in Israel on children <strong>and</strong> their families. This papersuggests amendments to the m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting laws in Israel to better protect all children fromsexual exploitation while providing consistent <strong>and</strong> expert professional intervention. Althoughstudies have been conducted regarding the impact of m<strong>and</strong>ated reporting laws on professionals,there is a scarcity of research exploring the impact on families <strong>and</strong> children affected by m<strong>and</strong>atedreporting. <strong>The</strong>re are several problems regarding m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting of suspected child abuse inIsrael, namely the differences between sexual abuse <strong>and</strong> other <strong>for</strong>ms of abuse that need to beaddressed; far fewer allegations of sexual abuse are substantiated in a court of law than physicalabuse or neglect. <strong>The</strong> tendency of some countries to advocate legal interventions <strong>for</strong> sexualabuse <strong>and</strong> therapeutic interventions <strong>for</strong> other <strong>for</strong>ms of abuse may stem from emotional reactionsto sexual abuse rather than the effectiveness of the legal approach. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, sexual abuseshould be dealt with using a separate law geared to h<strong>and</strong>le the special nature of sexual abuse thatwarrants unique expertise on the part of the professional involved, namely an amendment to thelaw that requires reporting of all cases of suspected sexual abuse regardless of the age of theabuser <strong>and</strong> the relationship with the victim. So that the m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting can be an instrumentof change, the separate law should clearly stipulate the procedures to be followed after the reporthas been made <strong>and</strong> should state the minimal qualifications of an expert in the field of sexualabuse. Future research should include two major issues: the factors associated with disclosure ofabuse <strong>and</strong> the child s expectations, <strong>and</strong> the consequences of the disclosure <strong>for</strong> both the child <strong>and</strong>family members upon implementation of the ensuing legal <strong>and</strong>/or clinical interventions,including possible differential effects over the long <strong>and</strong> short terms. Figure, referencesF-52