The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction
The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction
ArizonaArkansasCaliforniaLos AngelesSacramentoSan DiegoColoradoConnecticutFloridaFort LauderdaleGainesvillePolk CountyGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisCook CountyIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasDallasD-33
Southern Texas Utah VermontVirginia BedfordNorthern Virginia and District of Columbia Washington West VirginiaWisconsin Wyoming U.S. POSTAL SERVICEU.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) California Los Angeles Division Illinois Chicago Division Pennsylvania Philadelphia Division Pittsburgh DivisionWashington Seattle DivisionU.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION (USSC)U.S. STATE DEPARTMENTSTATE & LOCALATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICESCalifornia Georgia Florida Illinois Indiana Texas CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, POLICE DEPARTMENTYouth Investigations Section NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOS)Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitations (CAASE) Children of the Night Crimes Against Children Research Center Girls Education & Mentoring Services (GEMS) Love146 Motivating, Inspiring, Supporting and Serving Sexually Exploited Youth (MISSSEY) National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) D-34
- Page 157 and 158: association, was arrested after the
- Page 159 and 160: is transnational in scope; cooperat
- Page 161 and 162: Over the course of their communicat
- Page 163 and 164: An ICE investigation resulted in th
- Page 165 and 166: U.S. v. RichardsonICE PRESS RELEASE
- Page 167 and 168: APPENDIX C THREAT ASSESSMENT: ACADE
- Page 169 and 170: Selected Quotes from Appendix C of
- Page 171 and 172: * * * “Sheldon and Howitt (2007)
- Page 173 and 174: McCarthy, J. and Gaunt, N. (2004).
- Page 175 and 176: high-profile jobs. Some seemed isol
- Page 177 and 178: Trends 2008, http://www.iwf.org.uk/
- Page 179 and 180: Source: National Center for Missing
- Page 181 and 182: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FB
- Page 183 and 184: scientific survey process, but rath
- Page 185 and 186: • 42 percent of respondents repor
- Page 187 and 188: The Effect of the Lack of Internet
- Page 189 and 190: • 44 percent of respondents repor
- Page 191 and 192: • 24 percent of respondents repor
- Page 193 and 194: ONLINE ENTICEMENTExtent of Online E
- Page 195 and 196: • 37 percent of respondents repor
- Page 197 and 198: • 8 percent of respondents report
- Page 199 and 200: SEX TOURISMNature and ExtentAmong N
- Page 201 and 202: • 50 percent of respondents repor
- Page 203 and 204: Average Federal and State Sentences
- Page 205 and 206: SOURCESNumerous federal, state, and
- Page 207: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FB
- Page 211 and 212: APPENDIX EDEPARTMENT-FUNDED RESEARC
- Page 213 and 214: victimization. The project has four
- Page 215 and 216: APPENDIX FSYNTHESIS OF MAJOR STUDIE
- Page 217 and 218: 17 that among the participants who
- Page 219 and 220: authors, extrapolating survey data,
- Page 221 and 222: officials can gain greater awarenes
- Page 223 and 224: Moessner, Chris. “Cyberbullying.
- Page 225 and 226: The authors of this chapter in a bo
- Page 227 and 228: Wells, Melissa, David Finkelhor, Ja
- Page 229 and 230: The article reports the results of
- Page 231 and 232: system ۛincluding perspectives of
- Page 233 and 234: etween 42 and 44 percent of pornogr
- Page 235 and 236: Reporting the demographic, psycholo
- Page 237 and 238: predator with a victim took place i
- Page 239 and 240: 1 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent
- Page 241 and 242: conducted between September 1999 an
- Page 243 and 244: with each grade level, with the per
- Page 245 and 246: Understanding Online Child Pornogra
- Page 247 and 248: focusing on violent (including sexu
- Page 249 and 250: their offending than did Internet o
- Page 251 and 252: trafficking, rape and sexual assaul
- Page 253 and 254: States Postal Inspection Service, 8
- Page 255 and 256: Getting to Grips with Sexual Groomi
- Page 257 and 258: Child Seduction and Self-Representa
Southern Texas Utah VermontVirginia Bed<strong>for</strong>dNorthern Virginia <strong>and</strong> District of Columbia Washington West VirginiaWisconsin Wyoming U.S. POSTAL SERVICEU.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Los Angeles Division Illinois Chicago Division Pennsylvania Philadelphia Division Pittsburgh DivisionWashington Seattle DivisionU.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION (USSC)U.S. STATE DEPARTMENTSTATE & LOCALATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICESCali<strong>for</strong>nia Georgia Florida Illinois Indiana Texas CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, POLICE DEPARTMENTYouth Investigations Section NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOS)Chicago Alliance Against Sexual <strong>Exploitation</strong>s (CAASE) <strong>Child</strong>ren of the Night Crimes Against <strong>Child</strong>ren Research Center Girls Education & Mentoring Services (GEMS) Love146 Motivating, Inspiring, Supporting <strong>and</strong> Serving Sexually Exploited Youth (MISSSEY) <strong>National</strong> Center <strong>for</strong> Missing & Exploited <strong>Child</strong>ren (NCMEC) D-34
Change language