The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction

The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction

dcf.state.fl.us
from dcf.state.fl.us More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

software, to trade images. Further investigation revealed that she had also molested the 3-yearolddaughter of an acquaintance.She pled guilty to possessing child pornography and was sentenced to four years in federalprison and 15 years of supervised release. She will also be required to undergo sex offendertreatment while in prison.U.S. v. WittICE press release: Kettering man sentenced to 10 years in prison for transmitting childpornography over the Internet, March 13, 2007,http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/070313dayton.htmThe defendant went from chatting with other offenders about sexual activities involving children,to encouraging others in the online community to use their webcams to show children, and tousing his own webcam in that manner. In March 2004, he turned to an infant being cared for by afamily member, and used his webcam to video tape himself removing the infant’s diaper andmasturbating to that. This was streamed live over the Internet to other members in the onlinecommunity.B-7

APPENDIX C THREAT ASSESSMENT: ACADEMIC RESEARCH It is important to note that the inclusion of any study or research project in this Report is notintended to convey support for the findings of any of such study or research project.The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, Enhancing Child Safety& Online Technologies: Final Report of the Internet Safety Technical Task Force to theMulti-State Working Group on Social Networking of State Attorneys General of the UnitedStates, December 31, 2008,http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/ISTTF_Final_Report­Executive_Summary.pdfThe following excerpts are from the main text of the study and Appendix C: Research AdvisoryBoard Literature Review of the study.Selected Quotes from the Main Text:From the Harvard Study: “More problematically, media coverage has regularlymischaracterized research in this area, thus contributing to inaccurate perceptions of whatrisks youth face. This problem was most visible in the public coverage of the OnlineVictimization studies done at the Crimes Against Children’s Research Center (Finkelhor etal. 2000; Wolak et al. 2006). These reports are frequently referenced to highlight that one infive or one in seven minors are sexually solicited online. Without context, this citationimplies massive solicitation of minors by older adults. As discussed below, other peers andyoung adults account for 90%-94% of solicitations in which approximate age is known(Finkelhor et al. 2000; Wolak et al. 2006). Also, many acts of solicitation online areharassing or teasing communications that are not designed to seduce youth into offline sexualencounters; 69% of solicitations involve no attempt at offline contact (Wolak et al. 2006).Misperception of these findings perpetuates myths that distract the public from solving theactual problems youth face.” pp. 13-14.* * *“Although numerous studies have examined sexual solicitation, three national datasetsprovide the most statistically valid findings— N-JOV, YISS-1, and YISS-2— and areregularly analyzed in articles by Wolak, Finkelhor, Ybarra, and Mitchell. Findings inregional studies (e.g., McQuade and Sampat 2008; Rosen et al. 2008) affirm their trends.“The percentages of youth who receive sexual solicitations online have declined from 19% in2000 to 13% in 2006 and most recipients (81%) are between 14–17 years of age (Finkelhor etal. 2000; Wolak et al. 2006). For comparison, a regional study in Los Angeles found that14% of teens reported receiving unwanted messages with sexual innuendos or links onMySpace (Rosen et al. 2008) and a study in upstate New York found that 2% of fourththrough sixth graders were asked about their bodies, and 11% of seventh through ninthgraders and 23% of tenth through twelfth graders have been asked sexual questions onlineC-1

software, to trade images. Further investigation revealed that she had also molested the 3-yearolddaughter of an acquaintance.She pled guilty to possessing child pornography <strong>and</strong> was sentenced to four years in federalprison <strong>and</strong> 15 years of supervised release. She will also be required to undergo sex offendertreatment while in prison.U.S. v. WittICE press release: Kettering man sentenced to 10 years in prison <strong>for</strong> transmitting childpornography over the Internet, March 13, 2007,http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/070313dayton.htm<strong>The</strong> defendant went from chatting with other offenders about sexual activities involving children,to encouraging others in the online community to use their webcams to show children, <strong>and</strong> tousing his own webcam in that manner. In March 2004, he turned to an infant being cared <strong>for</strong> by afamily member, <strong>and</strong> used his webcam to video tape himself removing the infant’s diaper <strong>and</strong>masturbating to that. This was streamed live over the Internet to other members in the onlinecommunity.B-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!