UFC 3-280-02A Hazardous Waste Land Disposal/Land Treatment ...
UFC 3-280-02A Hazardous Waste Land Disposal/Land Treatment ... UFC 3-280-02A Hazardous Waste Land Disposal/Land Treatment ...
Table B-2. Review of State Hazardous Waste Management Programs (Continued)TM 5-814-7Specific Siting Burial Policies DiscourageState Universe of Waste 1 Procedures 2 Restriction LandfrilingNevadaRCRANew Hampshire RCRA X XNew Jersey RCRA + PCB’s, oil X XNew Mexico RCRANew York RCRA by statute X XNorth Carolina RCRA X XNorth Dakota RCRA XOhio RCRA X XOklahoma RCRA: no recycling exemption XOregon Equivalent: no waste listing X XPennsylvania Equivalent XRhode Island Equivalent: limited listing X XSouth Carolina RCRA: no recycling exemption XSouth Dakota RCRATennessee Equivalent X XTexasRCRA + halogenated hydrocarbonsUtah RCRA XVermontEquivalentVirginiaRCRAWashington RCRA + expanded waste list XWest Virginia RCRA XWisconsin RCRA XWyomingRCRANOTES:1. Universe of Waste: refers to the list of regulated wastes in that state.RCRA-State program is nearly identical to Federal regulations.Equivalent-State program is equivalent, but not identical to Federal regulations.RCRA by reference-State program adopted Federal regulations by reference.2. Specific Siting Procedures: refers to measure taken by the individual states to ensure new facilities are sited in amanner and location that is acceptable (or tolerable) to local citizenry.Adapted from Technologies and Management Strategies for Hazardous Waste Control, Office of TechnologyAssessment, Congress of the US, 1983.B-3CANCELLED
APPENDIX CTM 5-814-7C-1. Purpose and ScopeThe design example in this appendix illustratespredesign considerations and design principles thatrelate to the development of plans for a hazardous wastelandfill and surface impoundment. Both facilities areassumed to be developed for an existing governmentowned, contractor-operated, industrial installation thatmanufactures small arms, ammunition and chemicalmaterials. Where appropriate, the design engineer isdirected to primary references for additional details, aswell as to several figures in this TM for typical layoutsand design details. As needed, assumptions underlyingthe selection of design elements will be noted.C-2. Design Examplea. Site Scenario. The general location, size,hydrogeologic conditions, climate, and anticipatedwastes for this hypothetical installation are summarizedbelow:• A 2,000-acre installation in the Midwest characterizedby rolling hills above an adjacent valleyregion.• Located within Seismic Zone 2, as defined byparagraph 3-4 of TM 5-809-10.• Annual precipitation of 39 inches and mean totallsnowfall of 17 inches.• Average daily maximum temperature of 80°Ffor May through October and average dailyminimum of less than 32°F for December, Januaryand February.• Annual pan evaporation is 45 inches, with 76percent of the evaporation occurring from Maythrough October.• 100-year, 24-hour design storm of 5.8 inches.• Design freezing index of 500 for the region.• Silty clay topsoil 1 to 3 feet in thickness.• Glacial till clayey soils interspersed with discontinuoussand stringers to a depth of 200 feetover a shale bedrock.• Ground water (which occurs within on-siteswales) found at depths ranging from 90 to 120feet below the surface; flow direction is towardthe adjacent valley.• Ground water of drinking water quality existsin only limited amounts; it is not a measurablesource of recharge to the valley aquifer.• Liquid wastes (designated for the surface impoundment)consist of acidic wastewater; maximumvolume of liquid waste storage is2,000,000 gallons.EXAMPLE DESIGN PROBLEMC-1• Solid hazardous wastes (for landfilling) consistof (1) incinerator ash containing lead (10 cubicyards (cy) per day), and (2) sludges produced byan acid neutralization process (20 cy per day).b. Pre-design evaluation. Given the scenariodescribed above, the design engineer will initially reviewavailable documents and evaluate site conditions andwaste types and quantities. In addition, the engineer willperform additional hydrogeologic services identified inparagraph 3-3 of this TM including geologic mapping ofthe proposed site locations, drilling borings andexcavating test pits, and testing soils for geotechnicalproperties. Based on the available information, logs ofborings, and additional test results, engineeringproperties of soils and related pre-design calculationsand evaluations will be made; these are summarizedbelow:(1) Available data verify that both thesurface impoundment and the landfill can be developedwith adequate' vertical separation, and hydraulicseparation from ground water. Construction areas arewell above the 100-year flood plain. Both units allowexcavations which can provide needed topsoils, clayeysoils for soil berms and secondary liners, and soil coverneeds for the operation and closure of the landfill.(2) Tests of clayey soils determine thatthey exhibit a Liquid Limit of 40 and a PI of 18, a drydensity of 105 pcf, an optimum moisture content of 19percent, and a permeability of 3 x 10-8 cm/sec atoptimum plus 4 percent. When they were subjected tothe hazardous wastes to be contained, the clayey soilsexhibited a permeability of 5 x 10-8 cm/sec.(3) Based on stability analysis, earthfillberms or dikes constructed with on-site clayey soils willhave an adequate factor of safety for stability under staticand seismic loadings, provided they are constructed witha 12-foot-minimum crest width, a maximum height of 25feet, and side slopes of 3:1 or less (see para 3-3).(4) Based on current publications oncompatibility testing (EPA SW-870), supportiveinformation from several lining manufacturers, andaccelerated testing (using the waste to be contained), thefollowing liners were determined to be suitable for theproject: chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), chlorosulfonatedpolyethylene (CSPE), and high density polyethylene(HDPE) (see para 6-3).(5) In accordance with the Universal SoilLoss Equation, (EPA SW-867, page 37) A = RKLSCP,where(eq C-1)R, the rainfall erosion index for the location, is175CANCELLED
- Page 24 and 25: particular soil, the compatibility
- Page 26 and 27: d. Design elements. Design requirem
- Page 28: (3) Basic equipment for subsurface
- Page 33 and 34: TM 5-814-7of preventing migration o
- Page 35 and 36: priate coatings would be a suitable
- Page 37 and 38: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-3. Base liner de
- Page 39 and 40: Table 6-2-Summary of Liner Types-Co
- Page 41 and 42: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-4. Typical clay
- Page 43 and 44: Table 6-4. Requirements for Leachat
- Page 45 and 46: conductivity of the drainage layer
- Page 47 and 48: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-6. Typical run-o
- Page 49 and 50: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-8. Typical run-o
- Page 51 and 52: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-9. Run-on sedime
- Page 53 and 54: tems is the gas flow rate. Flow rat
- Page 55 and 56: 6-24sure covers is provided in EPA
- Page 57 and 58: Table 6- 7. Requirements for Specia
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 7OPERATIONS AND CONTINGENCY
- Page 61 and 62: TM 5-814-7tending into the area of
- Page 63 and 64: ing hydrogeologic conditions are de
- Page 65 and 66: TM 5-814-7CANCELLEDFigure 8-2. Moni
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 9TM 5-814-79-1. Introductio
- Page 69 and 70: 10-1. Cost Elementsa. Cost elements
- Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX ATM 5-814-7Government Publ
- Page 73: TM 5-814-7Table B-I. Summary of RCR
- Page 77 and 78: TM 5-814-7CANCELLEDC-3
- Page 79 and 80: (c) Based upon these calculations,
- Page 81 and 82: The proponent agency of this public
- Page 83 and 84: CANCELLEDPIN: 057162
- Page 85: UFC 3-280-02A16 January 2004FOREWOR
Table B-2. Review of State <strong>Hazardous</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> Management Programs (Continued)TM 5-814-7Specific Siting Burial Policies DiscourageState Universe of <strong>Waste</strong> 1 Procedures 2 Restriction <strong>Land</strong>frilingNevadaRCRANew Hampshire RCRA X XNew Jersey RCRA + PCB’s, oil X XNew Mexico RCRANew York RCRA by statute X XNorth Carolina RCRA X XNorth Dakota RCRA XOhio RCRA X XOklahoma RCRA: no recycling exemption XOregon Equivalent: no waste listing X XPennsylvania Equivalent XRhode Island Equivalent: limited listing X XSouth Carolina RCRA: no recycling exemption XSouth Dakota RCRATennessee Equivalent X XTexasRCRA + halogenated hydrocarbonsUtah RCRA XVermontEquivalentVirginiaRCRAWashington RCRA + expanded waste list XWest Virginia RCRA XWisconsin RCRA XWyomingRCRANOTES:1. Universe of <strong>Waste</strong>: refers to the list of regulated wastes in that state.RCRA-State program is nearly identical to Federal regulations.Equivalent-State program is equivalent, but not identical to Federal regulations.RCRA by reference-State program adopted Federal regulations by reference.2. Specific Siting Procedures: refers to measure taken by the individual states to ensure new facilities are sited in amanner and location that is acceptable (or tolerable) to local citizenry.Adapted from Technologies and Management Strategies for <strong>Hazardous</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> Control, Office of TechnologyAssessment, Congress of the US, 1983.B-3CANCELLED