UFC 3-280-02A Hazardous Waste Land Disposal/Land Treatment ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(2) Estimated date(s) of partial closure.(3) The maximum extent of the operationthat will remain open during the life of the facility.(4) Estimates of the maximum wasteinventory in storage and in treatment at any time duringthe life of the facility.(5) Procedures to decontaminateequipment during closure.(6) Estimated year of final closure.(7) Schedule to close facility allowing 90days after final volume of wastes is received fortreatment, removal or onsite disposal. Closure must becompleted within 180 days of receipt of last volume ofwastes.(8) Procedure for updating the closureplan.9-4. Post-closure plansa. Post-closure plans must be prepared for alldisposal facilities that will contain hazardous wastes afterclosure. Surface impoundments permitted for storage,i.e., those from which all wastes are to be removed atclosure, must have not only a closure plan for wasteremoval, but also contingency closure and post-closureplans to close the unit as a landfill, should completewaste removal not be possible. Likewise, ifdecontamination of a waste pile cannot be completed atclosure by removing the waste, waste residues,contaminated subsoils, structures and equipment, landfillclosure and post-closure requirements will apply.b. The post-closure plan for a hazardouswaste disposal unit or facility describes the owner oroperator’s responsibilities for maintaining theenvironmental protection and physical security of the sitefor 30 years after closure. The deed of the property, orother document that would be examined during a titlesearch, must alert any potential purchaser that the landhas been used to manage hazardous wastes. The deedmust notify the purchaser that post-closure use must notdisturb the protective features of the site such as theliner, cap, or monitoring systems. Any variation from thisstandard requires approval of the9-2TM 5-814-7EPA administrator or authorized state department.c. The 30-year post-closure period may bereduced if the owner or operator demonstrates that ashorter I time period will be sufficient to protect humanhealth and the environment. Conversely, the period maybe extended if, for example, groundwater monitoringdata indicate a potential for harmful migration of wastes.d. The actual contents of the post-closure planwill vary with each site to reflect the degree and type ofmaintenance dictated by the facility life, the closureprocedures, and the site’s design. For most units, thepost-closure plan will include activities in two principalcategories: (1) ground-water monitoring, and (2)maintenance activities. Components of these plans aresummarized below.• Ground-Water Monitoring— Include a copy of ground-water monitoring andanalysis plan— Indicate: (a) number, location and depth of wellsto be monitored during post closure, (b)frequency of monitoring, and (c) monitoringprocedures and analyses• Maintenance Activities— Facility inspection schedule— Care of cover and/or vegetation— Erosion control activities— Maintenance of ground-water monitoring— Collection and disposal of leachate— Maintenance of gas control system— Care of security systems— Response to unplanned events such as severestorm erosion, drainage failure, drought or otheroccurrence that could threaten facility integrityWithin 90 days after closure is completed, a survey platindicating the location and dimension of landfill cells orother disposal areas, must be submitted to the EPAadministrator and the local zoning authority or theauthority with jurisdiction over local land use.CANCELLED
10-1. Cost Elementsa. Cost elements for hazardous waste facilitiesare based on a number of variables, including:• Regional hydrogeologic setting• Condition of the existing facility• Local construction costs• Available water quality dataBecause of the number and complexity of the variablesgoverning costs, the analysis is limited to typicalhazardous waste land disposal/land treatment facilities,namely lined units.b. Cost elements for lined hazardous wasteunits include materials costs for liners, underdrainsystems, and ground-water monitoring wells; andinstallation costs, including the costs of necessaryequipment and labor. Since there will be considerablevariation between projects, however, a number of factorsmust be considered in estimating the capital cost of alined hazardous waste unit.(1) Type of liner material. Liner materialcosts can vary significantly, depending on the type ofliner installed, the required thickness of the liner and, inthe case of synthetic liners, whether they are reinforcedor not. Liner type will also influence installation costs.For example, seaming methods for synthetic liners(solvent, heat or contact adhesive) may differ dependingon the liner material selected; preparation of the linerbase is also different for soil liners than for syntheticmembranes.(2) Location of the facility. The location ofthe hazardous waste unit can affect both the cost oflabor and the delivery cost for materials. Materials costscan also be affected by the facility location, depending onthe availability of needed soils and aggregates.(3) Facility size. The size of the waste unitto beCHAPTER 10COST ANALYSISTable 10-1.SUMMARY OF UNIT COSTS FOR LINED FACILITYTM 5-814-7lined can have a significant effect on unit costs.Polymeric membranes and natural soil materials areusually sold at a discount when purchased in largequantities.(4) Site conditions. The soil types,topography and configuration of a site can influence linerinstallation costs. Preparation of the liner base isessential to liner effectiveness and integrity; the easewith which the base can be prepared will depend on siteconditions. Whether soils for liners and earthwork mustbe imported (at higher cost) will also depend on siteconditions.(5) Economic factors. The cost ofsynthetic liners depends, to a large extent, on the cost ofthe petroleum used in their manufacture. Market supplyand demand will also influence the cost of liner materials.10-2. Unit Costsa. Unit costs for various elements of ahazardous waste facility are presented in table 10-1.b. The costs presented in table 10-1 arebased upon standard building cost references, bid pricesand telephone inquiries to material suppliers. Unit costshave, in general, been expressed in ranges to accountfor the variation likely to occur from site to site. Inestimating the cost of a specific hazardous waste unit,the designer should consider the preliminary designcriteria as well as any site-specific factors which wouldinfluence the cost of materials or installation.Contingency and wastage factors should be added to thecost of installation, to account for adverse weather, seamoverlap requirements, and other such considerations;soil shrinkage and compaction should also be factoredinto the cost analysis.Element1983 CostsExcavation $1.50/yd 3(including clearing and grubbing)Earthfillberms and levees $2.00/yd 3soil liners $3.00/yd 3Soil Importsand (gradation for drainage) $10.00/yd 3drainage rock (rounded) $10.Oyd 3(cost delivered)Soil Placementsand $1.00/yd 3Vegetationmulch and hydroseed$1,000/acreFilter Cloth $0.75-1.50/yd 2CANCELLED10-1
Page 2 and 3:
ARMY TM 5-814-7HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND
Page 5 and 6:
TM 5-814-7LIST OF FIGURESPageFigure
Page 7 and 8:
CHAPTER 2TM 5-814-72-1. Federal reg
Page 10 and 11:
Table 3-1. Composition and Quantity
Page 12 and 13:
ial. All facilities must be designe
Page 14 and 15:
Table 3-2. Design/Operational Requi
Page 16 and 17:
(Identification and Listing of Haza
Page 18 and 19: TM 5-814-7Figure 5-1. Illustrative
Page 20 and 21: 5-4The structure should be designed
Page 22 and 23: c. Procedures. Impoundment of hazar
Page 24 and 25: particular soil, the compatibility
Page 26 and 27: d. Design elements. Design requirem
Page 28: (3) Basic equipment for subsurface
Page 33 and 34: TM 5-814-7of preventing migration o
Page 35 and 36: priate coatings would be a suitable
Page 37 and 38: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-3. Base liner de
Page 39 and 40: Table 6-2-Summary of Liner Types-Co
Page 41 and 42: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-4. Typical clay
Page 43 and 44: Table 6-4. Requirements for Leachat
Page 45 and 46: conductivity of the drainage layer
Page 47 and 48: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-6. Typical run-o
Page 49 and 50: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-8. Typical run-o
Page 51 and 52: TM 5-814-7Figure 6-9. Run-on sedime
Page 53 and 54: tems is the gas flow rate. Flow rat
Page 55 and 56: 6-24sure covers is provided in EPA
Page 57 and 58: Table 6- 7. Requirements for Specia
Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 7OPERATIONS AND CONTINGENCY
Page 61 and 62: TM 5-814-7tending into the area of
Page 63 and 64: ing hydrogeologic conditions are de
Page 65 and 66: TM 5-814-7CANCELLEDFigure 8-2. Moni
Page 67: CHAPTER 9TM 5-814-79-1. Introductio
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX ATM 5-814-7Government Publ
Page 73 and 74: TM 5-814-7Table B-I. Summary of RCR
Page 75 and 76: APPENDIX CTM 5-814-7C-1. Purpose an
Page 77 and 78: TM 5-814-7CANCELLEDC-3
Page 79 and 80: (c) Based upon these calculations,
Page 81 and 82: The proponent agency of this public
Page 83 and 84: CANCELLEDPIN: 057162
Page 85: UFC 3-280-02A16 January 2004FOREWOR
show all

UFC 3-280-02A Hazardous Waste Land Disposal/Land Treatment ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?