Approaches to Improving the Delivery of Social Services in Difficult ...
Approaches to Improving the Delivery of Social Services in Difficult ...
Approaches to Improving the Delivery of Social Services in Difficult ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Approaches</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Improv<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Difficult</strong> EnvironmentsContentsAcknowledgements ........................................................................ 3Abbreviations.................................................................................. 3Executive Summary........................................................................ 4I. Introduction ........................................................................ 7II. Why should DFID be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> Service <strong>Delivery</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>Difficult</strong> Environments? ...................................................... 9III. What are <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> challenges <strong>to</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g pro-poorservice delivery <strong>in</strong> difficult environments?........................ 13IV. What approaches can <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational community take <strong>to</strong>support<strong>in</strong>g pro-poor service delivery <strong>in</strong> difficultenvironments?.................................................................. 15V. What are <strong>the</strong> implications for DFID and o<strong>the</strong>r agencies? . 25References ................................................................................... 31Annex I: Conceptual Framework…………………………………….35Annex II: Types <strong>of</strong> Environment ................................................... 36This work<strong>in</strong>g paper is <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>to</strong> stimulate public discussion. It is not necessarily DFID orUK Government policy2