13.07.2015 Views

PCD Strategy Evaluation 2007.pdf - NT Health Digital Library ...

PCD Strategy Evaluation 2007.pdf - NT Health Digital Library ...

PCD Strategy Evaluation 2007.pdf - NT Health Digital Library ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2 <strong>Evaluation</strong> StagesThe <strong>NT</strong><strong>PCD</strong>S evaluation has occurred in a number of stages. They included a document reviewand analysis, the development of a draft report, a gap analysis, interviews with stakeholders,collation and analysis of materials, and the restructure and redevelopment of the draft report.Step 1. Document review and analysisA non-systematic document review was undertaken in 2005-06. It examined all of thedocuments that could be found in the <strong>NT</strong>DH&CS that related to chronic disease and any otherliterature that had been produced for, or had been fed into, the development or implementationof the <strong>NT</strong><strong>PCD</strong>S.In 2007 additional documents were collected from government and non-government sectororganisations as part of the interviewing process undertaken by RhED Consulting and additionalinformation and data was sourced. These documents were reviewed and collated under 6 corereportingareas that together reflect the objectives of the <strong>NT</strong><strong>PCD</strong>S and the <strong>Evaluation</strong> Frameworkfor the <strong>NT</strong><strong>PCD</strong>S and the Integrated Chronic Disease Care Framework developed by Wagner (30) .These core-reporting areas also guided the redrafting of this evaluation report.The six core reporting areas identified are:1. Clinical systems2. Workforce3. Programs4. Prevention5. Funding6. Clinical outcomes.Step 2. Development of the draft reportThe Community Physician and the <strong>PCD</strong> Project Officer drafted an evaluation report in November2006. They used the objectives of the <strong>NT</strong><strong>PCD</strong>S as major reporting sections. It was recognisedthat there were a number of information gaps in the report, particularly from the nongovernmentsector, due to limited data that had been collected from this sector. At this timeboth officers moved onto other roles and the incomplete report was left with the <strong>PCD</strong>S SteeringCommittee to finish.Chapter 2: <strong>Evaluation</strong> Methodology – <strong>Evaluation</strong> of the <strong>NT</strong> Preventable Chronic Disease <strong>Strategy</strong> 2007 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!