Literacy Trends in Pakistan - UNESCO Islamabad
Literacy Trends in Pakistan - UNESCO Islamabad Literacy Trends in Pakistan - UNESCO Islamabad
Table - 3Comparison of Pakistan with other South Asian countries in respect of literacy rate and other related factors – Year 1998CountryPer capitaGNP(US.$)Public exp.on educationas % of GNPPublicExpenditureon PrimaryEducation %of GNPPublic Expenditureon PrimaryEducationas % of totalEducational BudgetPublic exp. onprimary educationper pupil as % ofper capita GNPAdult LiteracyrateParticipation rateinGrade 1Survival rateto Grade 5Azerbaijan 480 3.00 1.9 57.8 9.3 97.3 81.3 98.1Bangladesh 370 2.2 1.2 43.6 8.1 41.0 64.6 70.0Bhutan 590 4.1 1.8 61.1 14.7 47.0 17.5 86.0Cambodia 260 2.1 0.9 89.9 5.2 68.0 62.4 45.2India 450 3.2 1.5 50.4 9.4 57.0 67.5 52.0Indonesia 640 4.0 2.6 30.4 17.9 87.9 48.3 85.3Iran 1650 4.0 2.5 34.4 6.2 75.5 95.7 94.8Japan 32350 3.8 2.7 53.00 16.5 99.9 99.9 99.9Kazakhstan 1340 4.5 1.8 26.2 12.2 99.9 98.3 92.0Kyrgyzstan 380 6.8 1.0 22.12 11.7 97.0 52.9 73.9Malaysia 3670 5.3 1.5 40.1 11.6 93.7 63.2 93.4Maldives 1960 6.4 2.4 38.9 12.1 97.0 96.8 98.0Mongolia 310 5.6 1.7 24.4 16.1 97.2 82.7 61.3Nepal 240 3.2 1.4 61.0 8.8 42.0 53.7 44.0Pakistan 440 2.7 1.1 51.8 11.6 43.2 66.1 50.0Philippines 1050 2.2 1.9 51.9 11.3 93.6 52.4 69.4Sri Lanka 850 3.4 2.43 16.60 4.64 92.0 94.0 97.0South Asia 444 3.2 2.13 43.73 8.97 54.0 73.8 54.0(WeightedAverage)Developing 1230 1.8 1.11 36.81 6.84 74.0 70.08 73.0CountriesSource: 1. World Education Statistics UNESCO 19982. A Synthesis Report of Education for All 2000 Assessment: In the South and West Asia sub-region for the Asia –Pacific Region3. UNDP Human Development Report 2001, Newyork: Pages 141-1444. Human Development in South Asia 2002, Mahbub-ul-Haq Human Development Center, Oxford University Press, Karachi.12
Table-3 above, indicates that countries like Malaysia, Maldives, Indonesia, Iran, Japan and Thailand who spend about 4 percent of GNP oneducation have literacy rates between 75 and 100 percent. A major indicator is the percentage of GNP spent on primary education, which has adirect bearing on the literacy rate. Countries like Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and India, invest about 1-2 percent of GNP on primaryand basic education, and have relatively low literacy rates as compared to the other countries listed in the table. Central Asian countries likeAzerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrghyzstan, Mongolia, and a few others are exceptions due to an emphasis on literacy and consequent achievement inthe past during the socialist regime. Pakistan is ranked at 138 (out of 172) position in HDI rank (with HDI index 0.499)* in the globe.When we glance at the global scenario of literacy, it appears that another important factor in raising both literacy and participation rates in 2000at primary level is public expenditure on primary education per pupil as a simple percentage of per capita GNP. Majority of the countries arespending from 8 to 15 percent of their per capita GNP per pupil in primary education. East Asian countries spent most of their education budgetson basic education — as much as 70 per cent. Forged alliances with the private sector, NGOs, civil organizations and many grassrootsmovements to spread education at a faster pace and in a more cost-effective manner, has also proved helpful in rising the literacy rate of most ofthe East Asian and other developing countries.In the early 1980s, under the umbrella of UNESCO an investigation into the factors that contributed to accelerated growth of literacy and basiceducation in countries of the region that were low in literacy, revealed that either the progress was due to the authoritarian nature of the systemof government like in Myanmar where the ruler, an Army General, had put literacy high on- his agenda, therefore the entire system was gearedto achieving long strides in literacy, or the delivery of literacy and basic education programmes was through the local cells of a politicalprogramme in which basic education was part of the ruling party's manifesto like in Vietnam and Laos.The international comparisons have a clear message that Pakistan lags behind many nations in its literacy efforts even at the dawn of the 21 stcentury. Therefore, if Pakistan has to make progress and achieve a respectable position in the world community, it has to accelerate efforts forthe realization of higher rates of literacy through basic education for specific age groups of children, and eradicating illiteracy among adults by anation-wide literacy campaign, and a literacy program on a war footing.10. LITERACY AND BASIC EDUCATION IN PAKISTANAdult literacy has remained a neglected area in terms of planned action in Pakistan. The overall strategy, from 1947 to 1998 has been restrictedto formal institutions only. Thus reflected replication of the existing formal model has been the major approach for the solution of the problemsof the basic education sector. Low investment in basic and primary education, successive failure of the promises made in every plan andeducation policy, and the practice of missing well marked deadlines, have created a credibility gap.13
- Page 2 and 3: ContributorsDescription and Analysi
- Page 4 and 5: Literacy Trends in PakistanUNESCO O
- Page 6 and 7: Part I - An Analysis of Literacy Tr
- Page 8 and 9: Part II Statistical Tables (Based o
- Page 10 and 11: an education that includes learning
- Page 12 and 13: district. This information on liter
- Page 14 and 15: In the present day context, when pa
- Page 16 and 17: 7. FUNCTIONAL LITERACYThe definitio
- Page 18 and 19: Middle Level (Level II)A) TARGET GR
- Page 22 and 23: Previous attempts made for the enha
- Page 24 and 25: 11. CURRENT LITERACY SITUATION IN P
- Page 26 and 27: Graph No. 1Growth of Literacy Rate
- Page 28 and 29: Table 7 below indicates the highest
- Page 30 and 31: Table 8Literacy Growth Rate Trends
- Page 32 and 33: District has progressed from a very
- Page 34 and 35: Table 11Districts in Various Litera
- Page 36 and 37: 13.2 Public Expenditure on Primary
- Page 38 and 39: lowest female literacy rate in Paki
- Page 40 and 41: All this suggests that a considerab
- Page 42 and 43: Graph No.4LITERACY RATE DIRECTLY EF
- Page 44 and 45: 16. LITERACY AND NATIONAL PLAN OF A
- Page 46 and 47: 17.1 Why has it been established?Th
- Page 48 and 49: Table 16 - Focus Areas and Key Stra
- Page 50 and 51: 17.5 Resource MobilizationThe Liter
- Page 52 and 53: PART - IIStatistical Tables(Based o
- Page 57: Table IILiteracy Rates (10 Years &
- Page 62: Growth RateYearsAll Areas Urban Rur
- Page 66 and 67: N.W.F.P.1972 15.50 23.10 4.701981 1
Table-3 above, <strong>in</strong>dicates that countries like Malaysia, Maldives, Indonesia, Iran, Japan and Thailand who spend about 4 percent of GNP oneducation have literacy rates between 75 and 100 percent. A major <strong>in</strong>dicator is the percentage of GNP spent on primary education, which has adirect bear<strong>in</strong>g on the literacy rate. Countries like Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal, <strong>Pakistan</strong> and India, <strong>in</strong>vest about 1-2 percent of GNP on primaryand basic education, and have relatively low literacy rates as compared to the other countries listed <strong>in</strong> the table. Central Asian countries likeAzerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrghyzstan, Mongolia, and a few others are exceptions due to an emphasis on literacy and consequent achievement <strong>in</strong>the past dur<strong>in</strong>g the socialist regime. <strong>Pakistan</strong> is ranked at 138 (out of 172) position <strong>in</strong> HDI rank (with HDI <strong>in</strong>dex 0.499)* <strong>in</strong> the globe.When we glance at the global scenario of literacy, it appears that another important factor <strong>in</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g both literacy and participation rates <strong>in</strong> 2000at primary level is public expenditure on primary education per pupil as a simple percentage of per capita GNP. Majority of the countries arespend<strong>in</strong>g from 8 to 15 percent of their per capita GNP per pupil <strong>in</strong> primary education. East Asian countries spent most of their education budgetson basic education — as much as 70 per cent. Forged alliances with the private sector, NGOs, civil organizations and many grassrootsmovements to spread education at a faster pace and <strong>in</strong> a more cost-effective manner, has also proved helpful <strong>in</strong> ris<strong>in</strong>g the literacy rate of most ofthe East Asian and other develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.In the early 1980s, under the umbrella of <strong>UNESCO</strong> an <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to the factors that contributed to accelerated growth of literacy and basiceducation <strong>in</strong> countries of the region that were low <strong>in</strong> literacy, revealed that either the progress was due to the authoritarian nature of the systemof government like <strong>in</strong> Myanmar where the ruler, an Army General, had put literacy high on- his agenda, therefore the entire system was gearedto achiev<strong>in</strong>g long strides <strong>in</strong> literacy, or the delivery of literacy and basic education programmes was through the local cells of a politicalprogramme <strong>in</strong> which basic education was part of the rul<strong>in</strong>g party's manifesto like <strong>in</strong> Vietnam and Laos.The <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons have a clear message that <strong>Pakistan</strong> lags beh<strong>in</strong>d many nations <strong>in</strong> its literacy efforts even at the dawn of the 21 stcentury. Therefore, if <strong>Pakistan</strong> has to make progress and achieve a respectable position <strong>in</strong> the world community, it has to accelerate efforts forthe realization of higher rates of literacy through basic education for specific age groups of children, and eradicat<strong>in</strong>g illiteracy among adults by anation-wide literacy campaign, and a literacy program on a war foot<strong>in</strong>g.10. LITERACY AND BASIC EDUCATION IN PAKISTANAdult literacy has rema<strong>in</strong>ed a neglected area <strong>in</strong> terms of planned action <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong>. The overall strategy, from 1947 to 1998 has been restrictedto formal <strong>in</strong>stitutions only. Thus reflected replication of the exist<strong>in</strong>g formal model has been the major approach for the solution of the problemsof the basic education sector. Low <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> basic and primary education, successive failure of the promises made <strong>in</strong> every plan andeducation policy, and the practice of miss<strong>in</strong>g well marked deadl<strong>in</strong>es, have created a credibility gap.13