Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report - Meghalaya State ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Description of the ProjectTable 2.2: Summary of Salient Features of Project RoadSl. No. Feature Project Stretch1 Existing Chainage 69.2 to 173.202 Length (Km) 104 km3 Improvement Widening4 Villages/Towns Payish,Yillarg, Wapung, Khlerihat, Lidrambai,Mynkere, Sonapur, Umkiang and Ratachera5 Raw material sources 12 borrow areas has been identified; 4aggregate quarries, 4 sand sources and 7water sources6 Rivers Lubhaa River, Baleshwar river7 Seasonal Streams Muksa River, Motaiya River, Narpu Stream,Tamung River, Umjrung Stream, TongshengRiver, Umprushung River, Apha River8 Air Monitoring Stations Kleirihat, Mumdihatti, at location with coal depot on both side, Umstad Village, Sonapur village , Ratachera Village (Near Primary School)9 Noise MonitoringStations Wapung, Near Mumdihatti , Thangskai Village (Near Church), Umstad Village, Sonapur, Ratachera Village (Near Primary School.10 Water Monitoring stream in Ladrymbai,Station Stream in Mumdihatti, Lubha River, Baleshwar river hand pump on LHS in Khilehriat Town, hand pump on LHS Mumdihatti town handpump on RHS in Pyrtakuna village11 Dump Sites Identified Dumping site identification for solid wastedisposal is under processes in consultationwith the State Government, a set of criteria willbe developed for such identification. Nodumping site will be located in forest area.12 Tree to be Cut 3450 including both reserve forest and nonforesttrees
Rehabilitation and Up gradation of existing 2 lane to 2 lane with paved shoulder from Jowai (km 69.2) toMeghalaya/ Assam Border (km 173.20) Section of NH-44 in the State of Meghalaya under NHDP Phase-IIIProgramme (Package No. NN/DL2/4)Fig. 2.1: Location map of the project roadFig. 2.2 The project road passingthrough Jungle Vegetation2.3 ROAD CONDITIONThe existing road has blacktopped carriageway with the width varying from 5.5mto 7m. The pavement in certain locations has developed cracks, rutting, ravelingand potholes mainly on account of poor drainage.In rest of the road length surface condition is generally satisfactory. Sideshoulders are almost un-surfaced and in damaged condition reducing the width toblacktop in most of the stretches.2.4 RIGHT-OF-WAYThe ROW could not be measured during collection of inventory data as noboundary pillars were available along the project. No data was available withPWD. The BRO has not been able to provide any data. The revenue maps do notexist. The consultant could not collect any information from revenue authoritiesalso. In built-up area, the land available is between 10m to 12m only.2.5 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALThe improvement works envisage widening of the carriageway (2-lane to 2-lanewith paved shoulders) and its geometric improvement, rebuilding the pavement tostructurally sound designs, construction of bridges and culverts, construction ofretaining walls, breast walls and other slope protection works, junctions and othermiscellaneous features e.g. road signs and other road furniture for improvingsafety and comfort of travel. Existing cross – drainage structures on the highwayhave been thoroughly examined for their hydraulic and structural adequacy andwherever some structures are found to be inadequate, these have been dulyproposed to be repaired/rehabilitated. New cross – drainage structures would beprovided on the new 2 – lane carriageway. The proposed improvement aims atimproving the riding quality, improving journey speed and reducing congestion oftraffic on the highway.Draft Environment Impact Assessment Report2-3
Page 1 and 2: National Highways Authority of Indi
Page 3 and 4: Sl.No. Description Page No.6.2 Envi
Page 5 and 6: Rehabilitation and Up gradation of
Page 21: Rehabilitation and Up gradation of
Page 73 and 74:
Analysis of AlternativeTable 5.1 :
Page 75 and 76:
Analysis of AlternativeImpact score
Page 77:
Importance Value/Weightage ValueAcq
Page 80 and 81:
Rehabilitation and Up gradation of
Page 82 and 83:
Operation stageAirConstruction stag
Page 84 and 85:
Ground Water QualityConstruction st
Page 86 and 87:
SoilConstruction stageEnvironmentco
Page 88 and 89:
Construction Sites andConstruction
Page 90 and 91:
Format No.ItemImplementationand Rep
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Public ConsultationTo solicit the v
Page 96 and 97:
PercentagePublic Consultation7.1.3
Page 98 and 99:
Public ConsultationTable 7.3: Findi
Page 100 and 101:
Public Consultation7.1.5 CONTINUED
Page 102 and 103:
Public Consultation7.2.4 PEDESTRIAN
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Environment Management PlanTable 9.
Page 110 and 111:
Environment Management PlanConstruc
Page 112 and 113:
Environment Management PlanEnvironm
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Environment Management PlanPollutan
Page 132 and 133:
Environment Management PlanSl.No.Su
Page 134 and 135:
Environment Management PlanSl.No.Su
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Environment Management Plan9.8.3 En
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
GLOSSARYEnvironmentBiosphereEco-sys
show all

Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report - Meghalaya State ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?