Students in remote localities face particularchallenges in being able to access training andworkplaces. There is also an important and growinginterface between <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>VET</strong> and communitybasededucation and training providers.It should be recognised that regardless of <strong>the</strong>irlearning pathway, <strong>the</strong> vast majority of students areengaged in <strong>VET</strong> <strong>for</strong> vocational and work relatedpurposes. However, some people work in <strong>the</strong>occupations <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y have not trained ando<strong>the</strong>rs work in occupations <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y do nothave relevant <strong>for</strong>mal qualifications 7 . This suggeststhat <strong>the</strong> ability to learn ‘on <strong>the</strong> job’ and <strong>the</strong> capacityto adapt to new job roles and circumstances isimportant <strong>for</strong> individuals and <strong>the</strong> work<strong>for</strong>cegenerally.These imperatives suggest <strong>the</strong> following threemajor roles <strong>for</strong> <strong>VET</strong> in assisting to meet <strong>the</strong> COAGoutcomes:• building sound foundation skills, in particularliteracy and numeracy at levels required <strong>for</strong>effective participation in <strong>the</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce and <strong>for</strong>fur<strong>the</strong>r learning;• developing technical and occupational skillsrequired <strong>for</strong> specific jobs; and• developing <strong>the</strong> wider range of broadercapabilities required <strong>for</strong> specific jobs and <strong>the</strong>capacity to take on new roles and jobs as <strong>the</strong>labour market changes.It is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e proposed that <strong>the</strong> definition ofcompetence be revised to make explicit <strong>the</strong> factthat competence needs to embody <strong>the</strong> ability totransfer and apply skills and knowledge to newsituations and environments and that <strong>VET</strong>qualifications allow <strong>for</strong> both occupational andfoundation skills outcomes.4 . 3 E q u i t y c o n s i d e r a t i o n sThe <strong>VET</strong> system is a key mechanism <strong>for</strong> delivering<strong>the</strong> nation’s productivity, work<strong>for</strong>ce participationand social inclusion objectives. Yet, <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong><strong>VET</strong> Advisory Alliance in its final report to Ministers(2008) noted that:Annual <strong>National</strong> Report per<strong>for</strong>mancemeasures (2006) <strong>for</strong> female students,people with a disability, those with alanguage background o<strong>the</strong>r than Englishand Indigenous students, indicate a lackof progress particularly <strong>for</strong> Indigenousstudents and students with disabilities in<strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong> system. 8Additionally, <strong>the</strong>y advised that:• Over a four-year period (2003-2006), relative to all students, <strong>the</strong>re had been little improvement in <strong>the</strong> proportion of students in <strong>the</strong> four equity groups participating in <strong>VET</strong>.• Over <strong>the</strong> four-year period, <strong>the</strong>re had only beena marginal increase in <strong>the</strong> load pass rate <strong>for</strong>Indigenous students, students with a disabilityand people who speak a language o<strong>the</strong>r thanEnglish at home. Women’s load pass ratesare at <strong>the</strong> same level as <strong>the</strong> overall <strong>VET</strong>student population.• In 2006, people with a disability were muchless likely than any o<strong>the</strong>r student group to bestudying at Certificate III and above courselevels. Indigenous students were alsounderrepresented at <strong>the</strong>se levels and overrepresentedat Certificate I and II or non AQTFlevels. This is of concern since Certificate Iand II level and non-AQTF level courses areless likely to lead to employment.• While <strong>the</strong>re had been a decline in fur<strong>the</strong>rstudy and employment outcomes <strong>for</strong> all <strong>VET</strong>students over <strong>the</strong> four-year period, <strong>the</strong> declineis much worse <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> four equity groups. ForIndigenous Australians and people with adisability who in 2006 were 14% and 22%respectively below o<strong>the</strong>r students inemployment outcomes, <strong>the</strong> falling trend over 4years is of major concern. 9In <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong>se per<strong>for</strong>mance outcomes, it iscritical that a revitalised policy framework <strong>for</strong> <strong>VET</strong><strong>Products</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st <strong>Century</strong> caters <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> diversityof learners it must engage, if <strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong> sector is tomeet national participation and productivity targetsand ensure that it maintains its strong reputation ofmaking a difference to <strong>the</strong> lives of those whostruggle to learn or work. In particular, trainingproducts and services of <strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong> sector must besufficiently flexible to cater <strong>for</strong> learners whose lifeexperiences, capacities, motivations, resources andneed <strong>for</strong> particular educational and o<strong>the</strong>r supportsare incredibly diverse, complex and in some cases,expensive.Given <strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong> system’s central role in meetingequity inclusivity goals and <strong>the</strong> imminentestablishment of <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>VET</strong> Equity Advisory<strong>Council</strong> (NVEAC), it will be critical <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> NQC andNVEAC to jointly conduct a review on how best toensure that equity needs are addressed.7The 2008 student outcomes data from NCVER indicatesthat ‘Overall, 30.3% of graduates were employed in <strong>the</strong> sameoccupation group as <strong>the</strong>ir training course. Ano<strong>the</strong>r 33.8%were employed in o<strong>the</strong>r occupations but found <strong>the</strong>ir trainingrelevant. 16.8% were employed in o<strong>the</strong>r occupations andfound <strong>the</strong>ir training not relevant to <strong>the</strong>ir current job’.8<strong>National</strong> <strong>VET</strong> Advisory Alliance final report, unpublished, p49<strong>National</strong> <strong>VET</strong> Advisory Alliance final report, unpublished, p5<strong>VET</strong> PRODUCTS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY - 11
5 . P r o p o s e d p o l i c y f r a m e w o r k a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s5 . P r o p o s e d p o l i c y f r a m e w o r k a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s5. Proposed policy framework and recommendationsOver <strong>the</strong> past two decades, <strong>the</strong>re have beensignificant re<strong>for</strong>ms to <strong>VET</strong> courses, providers andsystems to develop a national training system. Akey re<strong>for</strong>m has been <strong>the</strong> development of nationalindustry competency standards to define industrycompetency requirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> occupationscovered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong> sector. Training Packages(introduced in 1997), have provided a mechanism<strong>for</strong> directly linking qualifications and standards andensuring that outcomes from qualifications meet<strong>the</strong>se standards.In relation to <strong>the</strong> COAG outcomes, <strong>the</strong>re are twothreshold issues that must be addressed inconsidering any revised policy framework <strong>for</strong>national <strong>VET</strong> products, <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>:• current approach to defining, developing andassessing competence in Australia is sufficientto help achieve <strong>the</strong> COAG outcomes; and• current suite of <strong>VET</strong> qualifications specifiedthrough <strong>National</strong> Training Packages arerelevant to <strong>the</strong> needs, circumstances andintentions of <strong>the</strong> diverse groups of <strong>VET</strong>learners, can be consistently and reliablyassessed in terms of workplace competence,and can also meet <strong>the</strong> diverse needs ofindividual enterprises.Along with <strong>the</strong>se threshold issues, previous workundertaken by <strong>the</strong> NQC highlights <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong>consideration of issues relating to <strong>the</strong> structure andcontent of Training Packages as <strong>the</strong>y have evolvedover <strong>the</strong> last ten years.The outcomes of this project signal unanimoussupport <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> key pillars of Australia’s <strong>VET</strong>system: one single national system, with industrydeterminedoutcomes relevant to work, reflected innationally portable qualifications. The desire topreserve and protect <strong>the</strong>se aspects, and in somecases extend <strong>the</strong>m is very evident.Many feel that change is happening, and realimprovements are being made. Fur<strong>the</strong>r change,<strong>the</strong>y believe, is still needed, while preserving gainsmade to date.A number of concerns regarding <strong>the</strong> capability of<strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce also emerged. While this isbeyond <strong>the</strong> terms of reference <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> JSC , this isseen as an important consideration in ensuring <strong>the</strong>consistent application and interpretation of <strong>VET</strong>policies, concepts, and requirements (especially butnot limited to Training Package packaging rules)and it concerns all key players (including trainers,assessors, auditors, and training packagedevelopers). This will become more critical given anageing and increasingly casualised <strong>VET</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce.Based on <strong>the</strong> outcomes of <strong>the</strong> nationalconsultations, <strong>the</strong> Joint Steering Committeeproposes <strong>the</strong> following policy framework to improve<strong>the</strong> flexibility and responsiveness of <strong>the</strong> <strong>VET</strong>system. It should be noted that all of <strong>the</strong>associated recommendations have resourcingimplications.<strong>VET</strong> PRODUCTS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY - 12