13.07.2015 Views

Final Report of the Subcommittee on Domestic Trafficking

Final Report of the Subcommittee on Domestic Trafficking

Final Report of the Subcommittee on Domestic Trafficking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Secti<strong>on</strong> III – Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for Rec<strong>on</strong>ciling DifferencesThe third part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Subcommittee</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s three-part missi<strong>on</strong> was to make recommendati<strong>on</strong>s,as appropriate, for rec<strong>on</strong>ciling differences in services available to domestic andinternati<strong>on</strong>al victims <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trafficking. Our recommendati<strong>on</strong>s are discussed below:A. Differences as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y exist in statute:1. Difference: Some programs, such as ACF’s Refugee Cash and Medical Assistanceand OVC’s Services for <strong>Trafficking</strong> Victims Discreti<strong>on</strong>ary Grant, are intended toserve <strong>on</strong>ly specific populati<strong>on</strong>s, and eligibility is restricted by statute.Recommendati<strong>on</strong>: The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Subcommittee</str<strong>on</strong>g> does not believe that this difference merits arecommendati<strong>on</strong> for rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> informati<strong>on</strong> we have at this time. Theintent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> such programs is to provide small segments <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> victim populati<strong>on</strong> withservices because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are ineligible for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cash or medical assistance programs thatdomestic victims and certified trafficking victims may receive. Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> victimpopulati<strong>on</strong>s that are not eligible for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se programs may be eligible for equivalentprograms such as TANF and Medicaid. This recommendati<strong>on</strong> may merit fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rc<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> by SPOG.2. Difference: For certain Federal means-tested public benefits, lawful permanentresidents are subject to a five-year waiting period before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y may be eligible.Recommendati<strong>on</strong>: The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Subcommittee</str<strong>on</strong>g> recommends that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> possibility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>developing a process to waive <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> five-year waiting period for access to Federalmeans-tested public benefits for adult lawful permanent residents who are alsovictims <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trafficking be examined closely by SPOG. This waiver process could besimilar to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> certificati<strong>on</strong> process currently in place for internati<strong>on</strong>al victims. Such awaiver would permit adult LPRs to bypass <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> five-year waiting period for Federalmeans-tested public benefits. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Subcommittee</str<strong>on</strong>g> is aware that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> implementati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>this recommendati<strong>on</strong> may require a change in Federal statute. This recommendati<strong>on</strong>may merit fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> by SPOG.B. Differences as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y may exist in practice:1. Difference: Some NGOs report a belief that domestic victims tend to be perceivedand treated more as criminals (prostitutes or juvenile delinquents) than as victims.Recommendati<strong>on</strong>: The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Subcommittee</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s recommendati<strong>on</strong> for rec<strong>on</strong>ciling this is tw<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>old:11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!