MIL-STD-1629-RevA - Barringer and Associates, Inc.
MIL-STD-1629-RevA - Barringer and Associates, Inc. MIL-STD-1629-RevA - Barringer and Associates, Inc.
MI L-STD-1629Aua~owc oua2m cQ k.4u +LJbaE1-2 zwJ!0zw >w-1w az w01TASK 103If)?-?24 November 1980’
.--— .-—--— , --—— ——— —.TASK 104DAMAGE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS1. I’urpose. The purpose of the damage mode and e~fectsanalysis (DMEA) iS to provide early criteria for survivability andvulnerability assessments. The DMEA provides data related to damagecaused by specified threat mechanisms and the effects on weapon systemoperation and mission essential functions.1.2 Application. The MEA, Task 104, utilizes the results ofTask 101, and shall not be imposed without imposition of Task 101.~,: I’lani’i’in&İ’larming LlieWIIL4 i~lcludeb the contLacLoK”isprocedures for assuring the timeliness of the analysis and its utilizationin the vulnerability assessments of the weapon system.2. Analysis approach. The DMEA is an expansion of the FMEA——to include the generation of data reclui.recifor vulnerability assessments.It is prim3ri2y a~~li~abl~ to new weapan sysLem acquisitions but may beapplied to developed (existing) weapon systems where data is rec]uired toprovide criteria for a survivability enhanccrncnt program.2.1 New weapon systems. The DMEA is an expansion of the FMEAconducted and maintained for the weapon system design during conceptual,validation, and full scale development. The LV4EA shall consider allfailure modes and damage modes that can occur to each item and theeffect each has on the weapon system. ‘l’herelationship between theweapon sysLem essential f~Jnctions, mi.s%~on capabilities, hnst.1.l.e threatcapabilities, and hostile weapon effects shall be analyzed to providedesign criteria for survivability enhancement.2.2 Developed weapon s~stems. When specified, a DMEA is——conducted to identify all subsystems and components in a developed(existing) weapon system to the 1.CVC1 defined by the procuring agency.The DMEA is used to provide data related LO L]leimpact of EngineeringChange Proposais (ECPs) and retrofit propr~ms on rota] w[’apon ~ystc>msurvivab~lity. Threats should be periodi~:ll~~;●ssessed to duterninfi j[”the weapon system is still capable of operaLing effectively in a hostileenvironment,
- Page 1 and 2: MIL-STD-1629A24 NOVEMBER 1980SUPERS
- Page 3 and 4: MT7,-STW 1629AFOREWORDIThe~failure
- Page 5 and 6: ----MIL-STD-16Z9ACONTENTS(Continued
- Page 7 and 8: MI1.-STD-1629A1. SCOPEThis standard
- Page 9 and 10: MTL-STD-1 629A3. DEFINITIONS3.1 Ter
- Page 11 and 12: !’11 L-!;’J’l)- 1629A3. 1.17.
- Page 13 and 14: .MT1.-ST~-l629A4.3.5 Failure defini
- Page 15 and 16: MTT,-sTn-1629Afor each mission, mis
- Page 17 and 18: ?f?l.-STD-l629Ab. Des~ripGlon of de
- Page 19 and 20: MT1,-STD-1629A3.2 Functional approa
- Page 21 and 22: MI J,-STD-16?9Afunctional block dia
- Page 23 and 24: MI L-STD-1629A5.6.2 Next higher lev
- Page 25 and 26: Ml 1,-STD-1079Afurther amplified in
- Page 27 and 28: MIL-STD-1629A. --1III[IIIIIIIIIIIii
- Page 29 and 30: MIL-STD- 1629ATASK 102CRITICALITYAN
- Page 31 and 32: IMII.-ST1)-162(]Ashown in Figure 10
- Page 33 and 34: MIL-STD-1629Awhere:C* = Criticality
- Page 35 and 36: MI I.-sTI)-I629AINCREASINGCRITICALI
- Page 37: MIL-STD-1629A3*1 Failure predictabi
- Page 41 and 42: MTL-STD- 1629A4\l Damage modes. All
- Page 43 and 44: NI 1.-[; 1’1)- 1(); ?!)Au0.-.mr-r
- Page 45 and 46: MI I,-ST1)-1629A3. Content. The FME
- Page 47 and 48: —..-A 1MIL-STD-1629AAPPENDIXA10.
- Page 49 and 50: MIL-STD-1629A50.1.3 Intended use. T
- Page 51 and 52: MIL-STD-1629AWhere:C= “ Criticali
- Page 53 and 54: INSIRUCII ONS: In ● continuing ef
- Page 55 and 56: MIL3TD-1629ANotice 17 June 1983MILI
- Page 57 and 58: MIL-STD-1629ACONTENTS (Continued)Fi
- Page 59 and 60: MIL-STD-1629ASPECIFICATIONSMilitary
- Page 61 and 62: MIL-STD-1629Ad. Functional Failure
- Page 63 and 64: MIL-STD-1629A..2’Ilm.o.,id1-< xQ
- Page 65 and 66: —MIL-STD-1629A50.5 DMEA (Task 104
- Page 67 and 68: MIL-STD-1629ACONTENTS (Continued)Pa
- Page 69 and 70: .-MIL-STD-1629AAPPENDIX AAPPLICATIO
- Page 71 and 72: 20-30Stop LCNMIL-STD-1629AEnter the
- Page 73: NOTICE OFCANCELLATIONNOT MEASUREMEN
.--— .-—--— , --—— ——— —.TASK 104DAMAGE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS1. I’urpose. The purpose of the damage mode <strong>and</strong> e~fectsanalysis (DMEA) iS to provide early criteria for survivability <strong>and</strong>vulnerability assessments. The DMEA provides data related to damagecaused by specified threat mechanisms <strong>and</strong> the effects on weapon systemoperation <strong>and</strong> mission essential functions.1.2 Application. The MEA, Task 104, utilizes the results ofTask 101, <strong>and</strong> shall not be imposed without imposition of Task 101.~,: I’lani’i’in&İ’larming LlieWIIL4 i~lcludeb the contLacLoK”isprocedures for assuring the timeliness of the analysis <strong>and</strong> its utilizationin the vulnerability assessments of the weapon system.2. Analysis approach. The DMEA is an expansion of the FMEA——to include the generation of data reclui.recifor vulnerability assessments.It is prim3ri2y a~~li~abl~ to new weapan sysLem acquisitions but may beapplied to developed (existing) weapon systems where data is rec]uired toprovide criteria for a survivability enhanccrncnt program.2.1 New weapon systems. The DMEA is an expansion of the FMEAconducted <strong>and</strong> maintained for the weapon system design during conceptual,validation, <strong>and</strong> full scale development. The LV4EA shall consider allfailure modes <strong>and</strong> damage modes that can occur to each item <strong>and</strong> theeffect each has on the weapon system. ‘l’herelationship between theweapon sysLem essential f~Jnctions, mi.s%~on capabilities, hnst.1.l.e threatcapabilities, <strong>and</strong> hostile weapon effects shall be analyzed to providedesign criteria for survivability enhancement.2.2 Developed weapon s~stems. When specified, a DMEA is——conducted to identify all subsystems <strong>and</strong> components in a developed(existing) weapon system to the 1.CVC1 defined by the procuring agency.The DMEA is used to provide data related LO L]leimpact of EngineeringChange Proposais (ECPs) <strong>and</strong> retrofit propr~ms on rota] w[’apon ~ystc>msurvivab~lity. Threats should be periodi~:ll~~;●ssessed to duterninfi j[”the weapon system is still capable of operaLing effectively in a hostileenvironment,
Change language