MIL-STD-1629-RevA - Barringer and Associates, Inc.
MIL-STD-1629-RevA - Barringer and Associates, Inc. MIL-STD-1629-RevA - Barringer and Associates, Inc.
MTl,-STD-lf)2(l A3.2.1.4 Part failure rate (an). The part failure rate (~p) fromthe appropriate reliability prediction or as (calculated using the proceduredescribed in MIL-HDBK-217, shall be listed. Where appropriate, applicationfactors (n ), environmental factors (TE), and other n-factors as may berequired stall be applied to the base failure rates (~b) obtained fromhandbooks or other reference material to adjust for differences inoperating stresses. Values of n-factors utilized in computing ~p shallbe listed.--,,3.2.1.5 Operating time (t). The operating time in hours or thenumber. of operating cycles of the item per mission shall be derived fromthe system definition and listed on the worksheet.3.2.1.6 Failure mode criticality number (~) . The value of thefailure mode criticality number (Cm) shall be calculated and listed on~he worksheet. Cm is the portion of the criticality number for the iLemdue to one of its failure modes under a particular severity classification.For a particular severity classification and operational phase, the Cmfor a failure mode may be calculated with the following formula:,where:cm = Criticality number for failure mode.~, = Conditional probability of mission loss(3. 201.2 of Task 102).a = Failure mode ration {3.2. 1.3 of Task 102).Ap = Part failure rate (3.2. 1.4 of Task 102).t = Duration of applicable mission phase usuallyexpress in hours or number of operatingcycles (3.2. 1.5 of Task 102).3.2.1.7 Item criticality numbers (c,.). The seconu criticalitynumber calculation is for the item under analysis. Criticality numbers(Cr) for the items of the system shall be calculated and listed onthe worksheet. A criticality number for an item is tl]enumber ofsystem failures of a specific typ~ expected duc to the item’s failuremodes. The specific type of system failure is txpr(sse(i h!’ ~1)(’severity classification for the item’s f~ilur(~ modes. For a pnrrjcul:rseverity classification and mission phase, tt]c Cr for an item is Ll~esum of the failure mode critiralitv numbers. (-’r., under LI)Gs~’vcri~~c]a~~ificc~ti~n t][ldm~~v ;~qsU }W c:]lc:{l. .]~f,(~ ~;,sj! :1 L/.[If[l?l(~\\~~~’i’, [[’~l;llj~,-~ :JCr = ];(f?dpt)n n = 1,2, ’3,...jn–lTASKJ02—24 November 1980— — —.
MIL-STD-1629Awhere:C* = Criticality number for the item.n = The failure modes in the items that fall undera particular criticality classification.j = Last failure mode in the item under the criticalityclassification.4. Criticality matrix. The criticality matrix provides ameans of identifying and comparing each failure mode to all other failuremodes with respect to severity. The matrix is constructed by insertingitem or failure mode identification numbers in matrix locations representingthe severity classification category and either the probability ofoccurrence level or the criticality number (Cr) for the item’s failuremodes. The resulting matrix display shows the distribution of criticalityof item failure modes and provides a tool for assigning correctiveI action priorities. As shown in Figure 102.2, the further along the‘ dia~onal line from the crigin the failure mode is recorded, the greaterthe criticality and the more urgent the need for implementing correctiveaction. The example criticality matrix in Figure 102.2 was constructedto shc~w how either the criticality number (Cr) or probability of occurrencelevel can be used for the vertical axis. The completed criticalitymatrix shall be included in the FMECA report, General Requirements, 4.5.5. Ordering data. The following details shall be specifiedin the appropriate contractual documents:a. Task 101 (see 1.1 of Task 102).b. Analysis approach (see 3 of Task 102).c. Failure rate data source(s) (see 3.2 of Task 102)if quantitative approach is specified.
- Page 1 and 2: MIL-STD-1629A24 NOVEMBER 1980SUPERS
- Page 3 and 4: MT7,-STW 1629AFOREWORDIThe~failure
- Page 5 and 6: ----MIL-STD-16Z9ACONTENTS(Continued
- Page 7 and 8: MI1.-STD-1629A1. SCOPEThis standard
- Page 9 and 10: MTL-STD-1 629A3. DEFINITIONS3.1 Ter
- Page 11 and 12: !’11 L-!;’J’l)- 1629A3. 1.17.
- Page 13 and 14: .MT1.-ST~-l629A4.3.5 Failure defini
- Page 15 and 16: MTT,-sTn-1629Afor each mission, mis
- Page 17 and 18: ?f?l.-STD-l629Ab. Des~ripGlon of de
- Page 19 and 20: MT1,-STD-1629A3.2 Functional approa
- Page 21 and 22: MI J,-STD-16?9Afunctional block dia
- Page 23 and 24: MI L-STD-1629A5.6.2 Next higher lev
- Page 25 and 26: Ml 1,-STD-1079Afurther amplified in
- Page 27 and 28: MIL-STD-1629A. --1III[IIIIIIIIIIIii
- Page 29 and 30: MIL-STD- 1629ATASK 102CRITICALITYAN
- Page 31: IMII.-ST1)-162(]Ashown in Figure 10
- Page 35 and 36: MI I.-sTI)-I629AINCREASINGCRITICALI
- Page 37 and 38: MIL-STD-1629A3*1 Failure predictabi
- Page 39 and 40: .--— .-—--— , --—— ——
- Page 41 and 42: MTL-STD- 1629A4\l Damage modes. All
- Page 43 and 44: NI 1.-[; 1’1)- 1(); ?!)Au0.-.mr-r
- Page 45 and 46: MI I,-ST1)-1629A3. Content. The FME
- Page 47 and 48: —..-A 1MIL-STD-1629AAPPENDIXA10.
- Page 49 and 50: MIL-STD-1629A50.1.3 Intended use. T
- Page 51 and 52: MIL-STD-1629AWhere:C= “ Criticali
- Page 53 and 54: INSIRUCII ONS: In ● continuing ef
- Page 55 and 56: MIL3TD-1629ANotice 17 June 1983MILI
- Page 57 and 58: MIL-STD-1629ACONTENTS (Continued)Fi
- Page 59 and 60: MIL-STD-1629ASPECIFICATIONSMilitary
- Page 61 and 62: MIL-STD-1629Ad. Functional Failure
- Page 63 and 64: MIL-STD-1629A..2’Ilm.o.,id1-< xQ
- Page 65 and 66: —MIL-STD-1629A50.5 DMEA (Task 104
- Page 67 and 68: MIL-STD-1629ACONTENTS (Continued)Pa
- Page 69 and 70: .-MIL-STD-1629AAPPENDIX AAPPLICATIO
- Page 71 and 72: 20-30Stop LCNMIL-STD-1629AEnter the
- Page 73: NOTICE OFCANCELLATIONNOT MEASUREMEN
<strong>MIL</strong>-<strong>STD</strong>-<strong>1629</strong>Awhere:C* = Criticality number for the item.n = The failure modes in the items that fall undera particular criticality classification.j = Last failure mode in the item under the criticalityclassification.4. Criticality matrix. The criticality matrix provides ameans of identifying <strong>and</strong> comparing each failure mode to all other failuremodes with respect to severity. The matrix is constructed by insertingitem or failure mode identification numbers in matrix locations representingthe severity classification category <strong>and</strong> either the probability ofoccurrence level or the criticality number (Cr) for the item’s failuremodes. The resulting matrix display shows the distribution of criticalityof item failure modes <strong>and</strong> provides a tool for assigning correctiveI action priorities. As shown in Figure 102.2, the further along the‘ dia~onal line from the crigin the failure mode is recorded, the greaterthe criticality <strong>and</strong> the more urgent the need for implementing correctiveaction. The example criticality matrix in Figure 102.2 was constructedto shc~w how either the criticality number (Cr) or probability of occurrencelevel can be used for the vertical axis. The completed criticalitymatrix shall be included in the FMECA report, General Requirements, 4.5.5. Ordering data. The following details shall be specifiedin the appropriate contractual documents:a. Task 101 (see 1.1 of Task 102).b. Analysis approach (see 3 of Task 102).c. Failure rate data source(s) (see 3.2 of Task 102)if quantitative approach is specified.