Audit of USAID/Haiti's Public Law 480 Title II Programs

SCOPE AND METHODOLOGYScopeAppendix IRIG/San Salvador conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally acceptedgovernment auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit toobtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our audit findings andconclusions in accordance with our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtainedprovides that reasonable basis.The objective of the audit was to determine whether USAID’s P.L. 480 Title II program in Haiti isreducing food insecurity and increasing the resiliency of vulnerable and extremely vulnerablerural households. In addition, the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires auditorsto promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of USAID programs andto prevent and detect fraud and abuse in such programs and operations.In planning and performing the audit, we assessed the mission’s controls related to its P.L. 480Title II program. The management controls identified included review of USAID/Haiti’s August2011 operational plan, the mission’s FY 2010 annual self-assessment of management controls(which the mission is required to perform to comply with the Federal Managers’ FinancialIntegrity Act of 1982), the mission data quality assessments, site visit reports by the missionstaff, review of AOTR 15 files, and portfolio reviews.RIG/San Salvador conducted the audit in various locations in central, south, and southeastHaiti. Field visits were made November 7 to November 18, 2011, and December 5 toDecember 16, 2011.USAID/Haiti’s P.L. 480 Title II MYAP is funded under three main conduits: internal transport,shipping and handling (ITSH), which funds in-country costs directly associated with moving foodaid to storage and distribution sites and for storing and distributing the food; PL 480 Title IISection 202(e) which funds program materials, tools and equipment, administrative costs,management, and personnel costs; and monetization, 16 in which funds derived from the sale ofcommodities are used to cover costs not permitted for use under ITSH or P.L. 480 Title II,Section 202(e). The bulk of the program costs, however, are food commodities and shippingcosts to the host country, which are paid directly by USAID. Commodities are granted to thecooperating sponsors. Monetization proceeds are derived from the sale of a portion of thesecommodities. Our audit focused on MYAP activities performed under three cooperativeagreements with CRS, World Vision, and ACDI/VOCA.15 On January 1, 2012, USAID changed the term “AOTR” to “AOR” (agreement officer’s representative)to align with changes in the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Because audit fieldwork occurred beforethe change, this report uses AOTR.16Monetization in Haiti was halted in FY 2010 for the remainder of the MYAP because it was notsuitable.19