13.07.2015 Views

14. starptautiskā konference 2012 - Latvijas Jūras akadēmija

14. starptautiskā konference 2012 - Latvijas Jūras akadēmija

14. starptautiskā konference 2012 - Latvijas Jūras akadēmija

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of 14th International conference „Maritime Transport and Infrastructure - <strong>2012</strong>”same time the importance of analysis of cargo volumes (annual throughput) transshipped by the portand changes in commodity mix are stressed. The analysis revealed that over the last 10 years thediametrically opposed processes took place in the ports of Riga and Ventspils. If at the former theconcentration of cargo assortment occurred, at the latter the structure of cargo became morediversified. The structure of cargo turnover at small ports became more balanced in 2010 compared to2000. However, timber still accounted for two thirds of total turnover. The results of the analysis ofstructure dissimilarity for cargo turnover at Latvia’s ports demonstrated that it was much moresignificant during the period from 2000 to 2005 than from 2005 to 2010. According to Szalay indexthe structure of cargo transported though Latvia’s ports underwent the most important changes atVentspils port. Nevertheless, Gatev coefficients pointed at the most considerable transformation atRiga port. According to the coefficient of determination R 2 the equations for loaded cargoes at Latvia’sports (with exception of Ventspils port) demonstrated better goodness of fit compared to the ones forunloaded cargo.References1. A. V. Vasiliauskas, I. Kabashkin. Comparative analysis of the actions towards sustainable transport systemdevelopment in Latvia and Lithuania. Proceedings of the 6th international scientific conference “Transbaltica”,2009. – pp. 237-241.2. A. Maciulis, A. V. Vasiliauskas, G. Jakubauskas. The impact of transport on the competitiveness ofnational economy. 2009. Available (accessed on 15.03.<strong>2012</strong>):http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+impact+of+transport+on+the+competitiveness+of+national...-a02274615823. I. Kabashkin. Logistics centres development in Latvia. Transport. – Vol. 22, No. 4, 2007. – pp. 241-246.4. E. Meirane. Research on the structure of cargo flow in Latvia. Transport. – Vol. 22, No. 3, 2007. – pp. 195-199.5. A. Michaelowa, K. Krause. International Maritime Transport and Climate Policy. Intereconomics. - Vol. 35,No. 3, 2000. – pp. 127-136.6. D. W. Song. Regional container port competition and co-operation: the case of Hong Kong and South China.Journal of Transport Geography. – Vol. 10, 2002. – pp. 99-110.7. M. Benacchio, C. Ferrari, H. Haralambides, E. Musso. On the economic impact of ports: local vs. nationalcosts and benefits. Special Interest Group on Maritime Transport and Ports. International Workshop. - Genoa,June 8-10, 2000. Available (accessed on 15.03.<strong>2012</strong>):http://www.informare.it/news/forum/2000/sig2/genovaes.asp8. G. R. Yochum, V. B. Agarwal. Economic impact of a port on a regional economy. Growth and Change. –Vol. 18, No. 3, 1987. - pp. 74-87.9. G. R. Yochum, V. B. Agarwal. Static and changing port economic impact. Maritime Policy andManagement. - Vol. 15, No. 2, 1988. – pp. 157-171.10. J. DeSalvo. Measuring the direct impacts of a port. Transportation Journal. - Vol. 33, No. 4, 1994. – pp. 33-42.11. J. DeSalvo, D. Fuller. The role of price elasticities of demand in the economic impact of a port. Review ofRegional Studies. – Vol. 25, No. 1, 1995. – pp. 13-35.12. R. O. Goss. Economic policies and seaports. The economic functions of ports. Maritime Policy andManagement. - Vol. 17, No. 3, 1990. – pp. 207-219.13. P. Gripaios. Ports and their influence on local economies - a UK perspective. The Dock & HarbourAuthority. - Vol. 79 (894), 1999. – pp. 235-241.<strong>14.</strong> P. Gripaios, R. Gripaios. The impact of a port on its local economy: the case of Plymouth. Maritime Policyand Management. - Vol. 22, No. 1, 1995. – pp. 13-23.15. R. Gailītis, M. Jansen. Development of the Latvian maritime policy – a maritime cluster approach.Proceedings of 12 international conference “Maritime Transport and Infrastructure – 2010”. – Rīga: <strong>Latvijas</strong>Jūras akadēmija, 2010. – pp. 15-21.16. E. Kasalis, I. Kasalis, J. Kasalis. Clusters approach as one of determinants for increasing competitivenessof freeport Riga. Proceedings of 13 international conference “Maritime Transport and Infrastructure – 2011”. –Rīga: <strong>Latvijas</strong> Jūras akadēmija, 2011. - pp. 46-51.17. Практикум по социальной статистике (под ред. И. И. Елисеевой). – Москва: Финансы и статистика,2002. - 368 стр.18. Encyclopaedia of Measurement and Statistics (ed. by L. J. Salkind). Vol. 1. – London: Sage Publications,2007. – 424 p.19. J. Stewart. Assessing alternative dissimilarity indexes for comparing activity profiles. Electronicinternational Journal of Time Use Research. - Vol. 3., No. 1, 2006. – pp. 49–59.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!