13.07.2015 Views

14. starptautiskā konference 2012 - Latvijas Jūras akadēmija

14. starptautiskā konference 2012 - Latvijas Jūras akadēmija

14. starptautiskā konference 2012 - Latvijas Jūras akadēmija

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of 14th International conference „Maritime Transport and Infrastructure - <strong>2012</strong>”Conclusions1. There are no delimitation problems with Estonia, the 1996 Agreement is well serving the purpose2. Agreement with the Republic of Lithuania is considered as preliminary, but need to be denouncedfollowing the procedures of UNCLOS 823. Submission to International Court of Justice or to International Tribunal for the Law of the Seashould be initiated seeking for independent judgement on Latvia-Lithuania maritime delimitation.4. Maritime delimitation Agreement with Sweden should be negotiated to confirm the de factosituation, but first tri-point need to be agreed with Lithuania and Sweden.References1. The American Society of International Law, Vol .V, Essays on Developments in International MaritimeBoundary Practice, 20052. American Society of International Law, International Maritime Boundaries, Vol .IV, 20023. Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Latvia on the Maritime Delimitation in theGulf of Riga, the Strait of Irbe and the Baltic Sea, 12 July 1996http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/EST-LVA1996MD.PDF4. Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia, the Government of the Republic of Latviaand the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden on the Common Maritime Boundary Point in the Baltic Sea,30 April 1997 http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/EST-LVA-SWE1997MB.PDF5. Oil fields on the Lithuanian – Latvian sea border (Source – Ministry of Economics)6. Agreement between the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania on the delimitation of the territorialsea, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf in the Baltic Sea, 09 July 1999.http://www.saeima.lv/bi8/lasa?dd=LP0036_17. UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Office of Legal Affairs. Law of the Sea Bulletin,No.61, pp.17-21. http://www.un.org/depts/los/doalos_publications/LOSBulletins/bulletinpdf/bulletin61e.pdf8. Line Eglāja, Maģistra darbs “<strong>Latvijas</strong> – Lietuvas jūras robeža: tiesiskais regulējums un nacionālās intereses”- http://doktrina.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/eglaja-latvijas-lietuvas-juras-robeza.pdf9. ICJ Judgment of 3 February 2009 on Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine)http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/132/14985.pdf10. Swedish Government Ordinance on Sweden's Exclusive Economic Zone, 3 December 1992.http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/SWE_1992_Ordinance.pdf11. Agreement on Principles for the Delimitation of the Sea Areas in the Baltic Sea between the Kingdom ofSweden and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 13 January 1988http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/SWE-RUS1988DS.PDF12. E. Franckx, "Maritime. Delimitation in the Baltic Sea: Past, Present and Future", 199613. Lists of geographical coordinates of points are reproduced in Law of the Sea Bulletin No.76http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/DEPOSIT/lva_mzn54_2005.pdf10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!