Gazzetta tal-Gvern ta' Malta - doi photography competition

9420 VERŻJONI ONLINEGazzetta tal-Gvern ta’ Malta 18,7841332B’digriet mogħti, mill-Prim’Awla tal-Qorti Ċivili, fit-30 ta’ Ġunju 2011, fl-atti tal-ittra uffiċjali numru 1069/11,fl-ismijiet Dottor Michelle Tabone bħala Ekonomuta’ Monsinjur Arċisqof bħala Amministratur tal-BeniEkklesjastiċi Djoċesani kollha ta’ Malta għan-nom u flinteresstal-Knisja Parrokjali tan-Naxxar vs 1. Martin CurmiK.I. 559564(M) u 2. Robert Micallef (K.I. 117671M) ġietordnata s-segwenti pubblikazzjoni biex isservi ta’ notifikafil-konfront tal-intimat Martin Curmi, a tenur tal-Artikolu187(3) tal-Kap. 12.Fil-Prim’Awla tal-Qorti ĊiviliIllum 30 ta’ Marzu 2011Lil: 1. Martin Curmi (K.I. numru 559564(M) u2. Robert Micallef (K.I. numru 117671M).Permezz tal-preżenti Dottor Michelle Tabone, bħalaEkonomu ta’ Monsinjur Arċisqof bħala Amministratur tal-Beni Ekklesjastiċi Djoċesani kollha ta’ Malta, għan-nom ufl-interess tal-Knisja Parrokkjali tan-Naxxar, tagħmilkomriferenza għall-kuntratt appalt mogħti lilkom fit-18 ta’Awwissu 2009, sabiex intom tibnu oqbra fiċ-cimiterjutan-Naxxar, kif indikat fl-istess appalt u ġġib a formalikonjizzjoni tagħkom illi l-imsemmi kuntratt appalt, ġieterminat minħabba l-abbandun komplet u abbużiv tagħkom,kif ukoll minħabba li x-xogħol ma ġiex esegwit, la skont l-arti u s-sena la kif miftiehem u lanqas kif pattwit.Di più, bl-eżekuzzjoni ta’ tali xogħol intom għamiltuħafna ħsarat u arrekajtu danni inġenti lill-mittenti, li għalihomqed tinżammu responsabbli.Għal kull buon fini l-mittenti tinfurmakom, illi minħabbat-terminazzjoni tagħkom tal-imsemmi appalt u dak kifpremess, il-mittenti se jkollha tinkariga kuntrattur ġdid biexjirrimedja x-xogħol ħażin li sar da parti tagħkom, kif ukollsabiex jeżegwixxi l-appalt li intom bqajtu ma eżegwejtuxu minn issa qed tirriserva illi tipproċedi ġudizzjarjamentkontrikom għad-danni illi ser isofri, minħabba n-nuqqasijiettagħkom fuq imsemmija.Għal kull buon fini wkoll, il-mittenti tirrespinġikwalsiasi pretensjoni li saret da parti tagħkom, bl-ittrilegali minnkom mibgħuta, fil-11 ta’ Marzu 2011 u fis-17 ta’Marzu 2011, rispettivament, u dan senjatament, imma mhuxesklussivament, għar-raġunijiet hawn fuq indikati.Daqstant sabiex intom tagħrfu tidderiġu rwieħkom.Bl-ispejjeż.By means of a decree, given by the First Hall CivilCourt, on the 30th June 2011, in the records of the judicialletter number 1069/11, in the names Dottor Michelle Taboneas Bursar of Monsignor Archbishop as Administrator of allthe Ecclesiastical Entities of the Diocese of Malta, on behalfand in the interest of the Parrochial Church of Naxxar vs1. Martin Curmi I.D. 559564(M) and 2. Robert Micallef(I.D. 117671M) ordered the following publication for thepurpose of service of the respondent Martin Curmi, in termsof Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.In the First Hall Civil CourtToday the 30th March, 2011To: 1 Martin Curmi (I.D. numru 559564(M) and2 Robert Micallef (K.I. numru 117671M).By the present Dottor Michelle Tabone, as Bursarof Monsignor Archbishop as Administrator of all theEccelesiastical Entities of the Diocese of Malta, on behalfand in the interest of the Parrochial Church of Naxxar, refersyou to the contract of works given to you on the 18th August2009, so that you construct graves in the cemetry of Naxxar,as indicated in the same contract of works and brings to yourformal notice that the said contract of works was terminateddue to the complete and abusive abandonment on your part,as well as to the fact that the work was not carried out, noraccording to the art or trade as agreed.Further more, by the execution of such works you causedalot of damage and caused huge damages to the interpellants,for which you are being held responsible.For all intents and purposes the interpellant, informs youthat due to your termination of the said works and that asabove premised, the interpellant shall have to appoint a newcontractor to remedy the bad works carried out by you, aswell as to execute the contract of works that you did notexecute and is from now reserving to proceed judiciallyagainst you for the damages that she may suffer , due toyour faults above mentioned.For all intents and purposes also, the interpellant rebuttsany pretension made by your part , by means of the legalletters sent by you, on the 11th March 2011 and the 17thMarch 2011, respectively, and this especially but notexclusively, for the reasons above indicated.So much so that you may know how to proceed.With costs.