13.07.2015 Views

THE Doctrine of Maya - HolyBooks.com

THE Doctrine of Maya - HolyBooks.com

THE Doctrine of Maya - HolyBooks.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(&quot;Vivarta6o<strong>THE</strong> DOCTRINE OF MAYA(Trans.)As, O good one, by (the knowledge <strong>of</strong>) one ball <strong>of</strong> eartheverything <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> earth is known the ; change (ormodification) is an extension <strong>of</strong> words, a mere name, onlythe earth is true. 1Here it is said that by knowingthe one the allis known. As all the forms into which clayis1Some critics <strong>of</strong> the Vedanta discover in this passage acorroboration <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> Parinamavada. They contend that as the various things <strong>of</strong> earth (jar, pot, etc.) aretransformations <strong>of</strong> the earth, not being creations <strong>of</strong> theimagination (Sat <strong>com</strong>ing out <strong>of</strong> Sat only), so is the world assat a development <strong>of</strong> a subtle sat. Some <strong>of</strong> the modernevolutionists would also urge that the world is simply aprocess <strong>of</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> the one principle by whatever nameyou may call it, matter, spirit, thought, or the Atman. According to these views the Self transforms itself into NaturaNaturata, and as a real cause has a real effect, the worldmust be a reality. The Sarikhya system is also based onsuch a theory, which makes the world a reality, being anactual modification or development <strong>of</strong> real matter.This view appears to be based on an exclusively onesided interpretation <strong>of</strong> the passage. The whole rests onthe assumption that things like the jar, etc., are actualtransformations <strong>of</strong> earth. But the passage seems to us toendorse the purely idealistic standpoint, making the world,to use later phraseology, a vivarta instead <strong>of</strong> a vikara.The vivarta <strong>of</strong> a substance issimply its appearance, whichin no way implies any alteration in the thing itself ;whilea vikara is the transformation <strong>of</strong> the substance itself.= atattvato nyatha pratha vikara satattvatonyatha pratha.&quot;; To take a well-known technicalexample, milk is substantially transformed into curd orjunket: these are two wholly different states one cannotdiscover any milk when it is changed into curd. Buta jar <strong>of</strong> earth, even after individuating itself as a jar, does

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!