THE Doctrine of Maya - HolyBooks.com
THE Doctrine of Maya - HolyBooks.com
THE Doctrine of Maya - HolyBooks.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
""""126 <strong>THE</strong> DOCTRINE OF MAYAa cognition has neither the positive characteristics<strong>of</strong> an entity nor the negative characteristics <strong>of</strong> anon-entity, then all things may be<strong>com</strong>e the objects<strong>of</strong> all cognitions.Criticism. This difficulty is couched in a veryclever and catchy way. Yet the whole rests on amisconception, viz., the want or perceiving clearlytertium <strong>com</strong>parationis"is in e.ach case.what theSat and asat sound two contradictory conceptions,and to say that a thing an(" object <strong>of</strong> cognition ")is neither sat nor asat is not to say anything about itat all. But the thingisthought <strong>of</strong> in two whollydifferent aspects, and the tertium <strong>com</strong>parationis isnot <strong>com</strong>mon to both.<strong>Maya</strong>, we say, is neither sat nor asat, neither anentity nor anon-entity." It is not sat, sincethe Atman alone is real, and it is not asat, since itappears at least, or in other words, maintains itselfas an iva as it were(" ").Where is the contradiction now ? Does not this veryfact allow us tospeak <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maya</strong> as something mysterious, incapable<strong>of</strong> a strict definition ?5. The charge <strong>of</strong> Pramdndnupapatti.Is there any means by which this curious avidydisbrought within the range <strong>of</strong> our cognition ? Itcan neither be proved by perception nor by inference. Neither can it be established by revelation,as the scripturalwise.passages can be explained otherCriticism. In the light <strong>of</strong> what we have said