How to successfully complete the applied experience written ...

How to successfully complete the applied experience written ... How to successfully complete the applied experience written ...

13.07.2015 Views

on a quiet street,” will get you zero marks. Amore appropriate response would be, “A 1,200square foot 1970s bungalow, with full-finishedbasement, located at the NW corner of Mainand Fraser Streets, Woodpile, Saskatchewan.Neighbouring and adjacent properties are similarin age in utility. Middle and high school arewithin walking distance, transit is available onthe corner, neighbourhood strip mall with 12units one block away. Neighbourhood is stableand considered to have average demand. Pricinglevels have been stable for the last year due tostable local economic conditions.”You have to paint a picture for the marker, realizingthat we likely come from a different part of Canadathan you. For property location, if you cannotremember the address, then give a description –the marker must be able to tell that it is real, not ahypothetical example.• Explain your assumptions: Assumptions areacceptable and expected when answering thecase study portion of the exam, as long as theyare reasonable and kept in perspective of thesituation being addressed. If the case studyindicates there has been no market activity inthe area, do not respond by assuming that youhave adequate sales in the area to support anestimate of market value. Assumptions shouldnot be used as a crutch to easily get throughthe case study; this will return a failing grade.For example, saying, “Highest and best useis assumed to be the current use” withoutexplanation equals zero marks. You must explainto the marker the steps you would take to arriveat that conclusion.• Give answers, not questions: Do not answer thecase study question with more questions, thiswill likely result in a failing grade. Asking a stringof erroneous questions does not demonstrateto the marker that you have logically thoughtthrough the First Principles of Value to arrive at aconclusion for the situation presented.• Appropriate work examples: Your work experienceexamples should be appropriate for yourlevel of experience. If you are writing the CRAexam, then avoid work examples of propertiesthat do not conform to the CRA limitations. As aCRA Candidate, if you discuss properties beyondthe CRA’s limitations, then be cautious to explainthe limitations of your role and where additionalassistance was required. Otherwise, it is a breachof professional ethics.• Cautious terminology: Avoid slang terms, acronyms,and improper terminology. For example:- In Canada, we use CUSPAP, not USPAP;- If you are describing a retrospective report, donot call it a retroactive report;- AIC uses market value, not fair market value(an accounting term);Avoid using acronyms in your examples, asmarkers are from various regions of Canada andmay be unfamiliar with the terms, e.g., AccreditedMunicipal Assessor of Alberta (AMAA),Property Assessment Appeal Board (PAAB), etc.• Answer everything: Try and get an answer downfor all questions. If you miss answering one of thework experience examples due to lack of time,it leaves little margin for error to pass the exam,given the minimum total pass mark of 70%needed on both case study and work experience.• Be general and comprehensive: When answeringthe case study portion of the exam, avoidanswering it solely from the specialized or limitedperspective of your current job. Explainingto the marker that you need not be concernedwith market value because of assessment lawin your province will undoubtedly not cover allFirst Principles of Value. Answer the questionfrom a wider, more general, and morecomprehensive perspective.• Consider Point Form: To best answer the casestudy, you must work through all of the FirstPrinciples of Value. Using expanded point formto go through each principle can be an efficientand effective way of ensuring you are coveringall aspects of the case study.• ‘I’ not ‘we’: Be careful about the ‘team’approach – when answering the workexperience example questions, explain tothe marker what ‘you’ did, not what ‘we’did. This does not preclude teamwork, butyou must tell what you did in that team toaddress the First Principle being described.• Explain suitability: There are three parts to thework experience question: description, suitabilityand details. The second part is easily overlooked,but, if answered appropriately, it segues nicelyinto the details of the example.Answer the 5 W’s and do not forget the HFinally, keep in mind these last few importantpoints for success:• Answer the who, what, when, where, why, anddo not forget the how. At the end of the day, thehow is what the marker is looking for. How didyou determine highest and best use, how didyou find market evidence to justify the adjustmentmade, how did you analyze the economicvariables of the situation, how did you ensurethat you reviewed all possible legal issues thatcould have an effect on your estimate of marketvalue, how did you ensure the property rightswere those of the fee simple….and so on.• Make it easy for the marker to logically gothrough your exam and understand how youhave related everything back to the First Principlesof Value. Keep the verbosity in check. Forexample, “It is assumed that the property rightsappraised are those of the fee simple interest.”Do not go into an elaborate dissertation on theconcept of the Bundle of Rights if unnecessary.• Last, but not least, remember you are puttingforward a professional argument for review andexamination. Do not assume the marker knowswhat you are trying to say, tell the marker whatyou are saying. Logic of argument, compositionof material and rationale behind assumptionsall play a factor. Writing clearly, logically, andthoroughly without being long-winded andrepetitious will serve you well in presenting awell-written exam.Learning Advisory CommitteeDavid Highfield, AACI, P. App – ChairApril Green, CandidateSuzanne de Jong, AACI, P. AppWayne Kipp, AACI, P. AppVikki Leslie, Qualifications Officer, AIC - ONCharles Abromaitis, AACI, P. AppDuane Bates, AACI, P. AppDavid Shum, AACI, P. AppTo contact this committee email:lac@aicanada.caCanadian Property Valuation Volume 53 | book 4 | 2009 Évaluation Immobilière au Canada 31

on a quiet street,” will get you zero marks. Amore appropriate response would be, “A 1,200square foot 1970s bungalow, with full-finishedbasement, located at <strong>the</strong> NW corner of Mainand Fraser Streets, Woodpile, Saskatchewan.Neighbouring and adjacent properties are similarin age in utility. Middle and high school arewithin walking distance, transit is available on<strong>the</strong> corner, neighbourhood strip mall with 12units one block away. Neighbourhood is stableand considered <strong>to</strong> have average demand. Pricinglevels have been stable for <strong>the</strong> last year due <strong>to</strong>stable local economic conditions.”You have <strong>to</strong> paint a picture for <strong>the</strong> marker, realizingthat we likely come from a different part of Canadathan you. For property location, if you cannotremember <strong>the</strong> address, <strong>the</strong>n give a description –<strong>the</strong> marker must be able <strong>to</strong> tell that it is real, not ahypo<strong>the</strong>tical example.• Explain your assumptions: Assumptions areacceptable and expected when answering <strong>the</strong>case study portion of <strong>the</strong> exam, as long as <strong>the</strong>yare reasonable and kept in perspective of <strong>the</strong>situation being addressed. If <strong>the</strong> case studyindicates <strong>the</strong>re has been no market activity in<strong>the</strong> area, do not respond by assuming that youhave adequate sales in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>to</strong> support anestimate of market value. Assumptions shouldnot be used as a crutch <strong>to</strong> easily get through<strong>the</strong> case study; this will return a failing grade.For example, saying, “Highest and best useis assumed <strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong> current use” withoutexplanation equals zero marks. You must explain<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> marker <strong>the</strong> steps you would take <strong>to</strong> arriveat that conclusion.• Give answers, not questions: Do not answer <strong>the</strong>case study question with more questions, thiswill likely result in a failing grade. Asking a stringof erroneous questions does not demonstrate<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> marker that you have logically thoughtthrough <strong>the</strong> First Principles of Value <strong>to</strong> arrive at aconclusion for <strong>the</strong> situation presented.• Appropriate work examples: Your work <strong>experience</strong>examples should be appropriate for yourlevel of <strong>experience</strong>. If you are writing <strong>the</strong> CRAexam, <strong>the</strong>n avoid work examples of propertiesthat do not conform <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRA limitations. As aCRA Candidate, if you discuss properties beyond<strong>the</strong> CRA’s limitations, <strong>the</strong>n be cautious <strong>to</strong> explain<strong>the</strong> limitations of your role and where additionalassistance was required. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, it is a breachof professional ethics.• Cautious terminology: Avoid slang terms, acronyms,and improper terminology. For example:- In Canada, we use CUSPAP, not USPAP;- If you are describing a retrospective report, donot call it a retroactive report;- AIC uses market value, not fair market value(an accounting term);Avoid using acronyms in your examples, asmarkers are from various regions of Canada andmay be unfamiliar with <strong>the</strong> terms, e.g., AccreditedMunicipal Assessor of Alberta (AMAA),Property Assessment Appeal Board (PAAB), etc.• Answer everything: Try and get an answer downfor all questions. If you miss answering one of <strong>the</strong>work <strong>experience</strong> examples due <strong>to</strong> lack of time,it leaves little margin for error <strong>to</strong> pass <strong>the</strong> exam,given <strong>the</strong> minimum <strong>to</strong>tal pass mark of 70%needed on both case study and work <strong>experience</strong>.• Be general and comprehensive: When answering<strong>the</strong> case study portion of <strong>the</strong> exam, avoidanswering it solely from <strong>the</strong> specialized or limitedperspective of your current job. Explaining<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> marker that you need not be concernedwith market value because of assessment lawin your province will undoubtedly not cover allFirst Principles of Value. Answer <strong>the</strong> questionfrom a wider, more general, and morecomprehensive perspective.• Consider Point Form: To best answer <strong>the</strong> casestudy, you must work through all of <strong>the</strong> FirstPrinciples of Value. Using expanded point form<strong>to</strong> go through each principle can be an efficientand effective way of ensuring you are coveringall aspects of <strong>the</strong> case study.• ‘I’ not ‘we’: Be careful about <strong>the</strong> ‘team’approach – when answering <strong>the</strong> work<strong>experience</strong> example questions, explain <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> marker what ‘you’ did, not what ‘we’did. This does not preclude teamwork, butyou must tell what you did in that team <strong>to</strong>address <strong>the</strong> First Principle being described.• Explain suitability: There are three parts <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>work <strong>experience</strong> question: description, suitabilityand details. The second part is easily overlooked,but, if answered appropriately, it segues nicelyin<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> details of <strong>the</strong> example.Answer <strong>the</strong> 5 W’s and do not forget <strong>the</strong> HFinally, keep in mind <strong>the</strong>se last few importantpoints for success:• Answer <strong>the</strong> who, what, when, where, why, anddo not forget <strong>the</strong> how. At <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> day, <strong>the</strong>how is what <strong>the</strong> marker is looking for. <strong>How</strong> didyou determine highest and best use, how didyou find market evidence <strong>to</strong> justify <strong>the</strong> adjustmentmade, how did you analyze <strong>the</strong> economicvariables of <strong>the</strong> situation, how did you ensurethat you reviewed all possible legal issues thatcould have an effect on your estimate of marketvalue, how did you ensure <strong>the</strong> property rightswere those of <strong>the</strong> fee simple….and so on.• Make it easy for <strong>the</strong> marker <strong>to</strong> logically gothrough your exam and understand how youhave related everything back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> First Principlesof Value. Keep <strong>the</strong> verbosity in check. Forexample, “It is assumed that <strong>the</strong> property rightsappraised are those of <strong>the</strong> fee simple interest.”Do not go in<strong>to</strong> an elaborate dissertation on <strong>the</strong>concept of <strong>the</strong> Bundle of Rights if unnecessary.• Last, but not least, remember you are puttingforward a professional argument for review andexamination. Do not assume <strong>the</strong> marker knowswhat you are trying <strong>to</strong> say, tell <strong>the</strong> marker whatyou are saying. Logic of argument, compositionof material and rationale behind assumptionsall play a fac<strong>to</strong>r. Writing clearly, logically, andthoroughly without being long-winded andrepetitious will serve you well in presenting awell-<strong>written</strong> exam.Learning Advisory CommitteeDavid Highfield, AACI, P. App – ChairApril Green, CandidateSuzanne de Jong, AACI, P. AppWayne Kipp, AACI, P. AppVikki Leslie, Qualifications Officer, AIC - ONCharles Abromaitis, AACI, P. AppDuane Bates, AACI, P. AppDavid Shum, AACI, P. AppTo contact this committee email:lac@aicanada.caCanadian Property Valuation Volume 53 | book 4 | 2009 Évaluation Immobilière au Canada 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!