66940 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Rules and RegulationsWReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES2minutes), thus further reducing burdenon the individual applicant.For example, when we consider theestimated 5.1 million 2008–2009applicants selected for verification at anaverage <strong>of</strong> .20 hours (12 minutes) tocollect and submit information,including supporting documentation forthe five required data elements (whichis the estimated amount <strong>of</strong> time that isassociated with the requirements incurrent § 668.56(a)), the requirements inthat section yields a total burden <strong>of</strong>1,020,000 hours added to OMB ControlNumber 1845–0041. However, under§ 668.56(b), where the number <strong>of</strong>verification data elements will bereduced to an average <strong>of</strong> three, theestimated 5.1 million individualsselected for verification multiplied bythe reduced average <strong>of</strong> .12 minutes(7 minutes) yields an increase <strong>of</strong>612,000 hours in burden. Therefore, wewill expect the burden to be 408,000hours less than under the currentregulations.As a result, for OMB reportingpurposes, we estimate that theindividuals, as a group, will have anincrease in burden by 612,000 hours inOMB Control Number 1845–0041(rather than 1,020,000 hours).Section 668.57—AcceptableDocumentationWe have made a number <strong>of</strong> technicaland conforming changes throughout§ 668.57. We also have made thefollowing substantive changes describedin this section.Section 668.57(a)(2) will allow aninstitution to accept, in lieu <strong>of</strong> anincome tax return or an IRS form thatlists tax account information, theelectronic importation <strong>of</strong> data obtainedfrom the IRS into an applicant’s onlineFAFSA.We also have amended§ 668.57(a)(4)(ii)(A) to accurately reflectthat, upon application, the IRS grants asix-month extension beyond the April15 deadline rather than the four-monthextension currently stated in theregulations.Under § 668.57(a)(5), an institutionmay require an applicant who has beengranted an extension to file his or herincome tax return to provide a copy <strong>of</strong>that tax return once it has been filed. Ifthe institution requires the applicant tosubmit the tax return, it will need to reverifythe AGI and taxes paid <strong>of</strong> theapplicant and his or her spouse orparents when the institution receivesthe return.Section 668.57(a)(7) clarifies that anapplicant’s income tax return that issigned by the preparer or stamped withthe preparer’s name and address mustalso include the preparer’s SocialSecurity number, EmployerIdentification Number or the PreparerTax Identification Number.Section 668.57(b) and (c) remainsubstantively unchanged.We have deleted current § 668.57(d)regarding acceptable documentation foruntaxed income and benefits andreplaced it with a new § 668.57(d). Thisnew section provides that, if anapplicant is selected to verify otherinformation specified in an annualFederal Register notice, the applicantmust provide the documentationspecified for that information in theFederal Register notice.Currently under OMB ControlNumber 1845–0041, there are 1,022,384hours <strong>of</strong> burden associated with theverification regulations, <strong>of</strong> which 12,312hours are attributable to institutions <strong>of</strong>higher education to establish theirverification policies and procedures.Under § 668.57, we estimate that, onaverage, institutions will take .12 hours(7 minutes) per applicant selected forverification to review and takeappropriate action based upon theinformation provided by the applicant,which in some cases may meancorrecting applicant data or having theapplicant correct his or her data. Undercurrent § 668.57, when we consider thesignificant increase to 17.4 millionapplicants in the 2008–2009 award year,<strong>of</strong> which 5.1 million will be selected forverification at an average <strong>of</strong> .20 hours(12 minutes) per verification responsereceived from applicants by theinstitutions for review, the total increasein burden will be 1,020,000 additionalhours. However, under § 668.57, boththe average number <strong>of</strong> items to beverified will be reduced from five itemsto three items, as well as the averageamount <strong>of</strong> time to review will decreasefrom .20 hours (12 minutes) to .12 hours(7 minutes). Therefore, the burden toinstitutions will be 612,000 burdenhours (that is, 5.1 million multiplied by.12 hours (7 minutes))—rather than1,020,000 burden hours (i.e., 5.1 millionapplicants multiplied by .20 hours (12minutes)). Thus, as compared to theburden under the current regulations,using the number <strong>of</strong> applicants from2008–2009—17.4 million—there will be408,000 fewer burden hours forinstitutions.We estimate 226,440 hours <strong>of</strong>increased burden for proprietaryinstitutions (2,086 proprietaryinstitutions <strong>of</strong> the total 5,709 affectedinstitutions or 37 percent multiplied by5,100,000 applicants equals 1,887,000applicants multiplied by .12 hours (7minutes)).VerDate Mar2010 14:10 Oct 28, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29OCR2.SGM 29OCR2We estimate 183,600 hours <strong>of</strong>increased burden for private non-pr<strong>of</strong>itinstitutions (1,731 private non-pr<strong>of</strong>itinstitutions <strong>of</strong> the total 5,709 affectedinstitutions or 30 percent multiplied by5,100,000 applicants equals 1,530,000applicants multiplied by .12 hours (7minutes)).We estimate 201,960 hours <strong>of</strong>increased burden for public institutions(1,892 public institutions <strong>of</strong> the total5,709 affected institution or 33 percentmultiplied by 5,100,000 applicantsmultiplied by .12 hours (7 minutes)).As a result, for OMB reportingpurposes, collectively there will be aprojected increase <strong>of</strong> 612,000 hours <strong>of</strong>burden for institutions in OMB ControlNumber 1845–0041.Section 668.59—Consequences <strong>of</strong> aChange in FAFSA InformationWe have amended § 668.59 byremoving all allowable tolerances andrequiring instead that an institutionsubmit to the <strong>Department</strong> all applicablechanges to an applicant’s FAFSAinformation resulting from verificationfor those applicants receiving assistanceunder any <strong>of</strong> the subsidized studentfinancial assistance programs (see§ 668.59(a)).Under § 668.59(b), for the Federal PellGrant program, once the applicantprovides the institution with thecorrected SAR or ISIR, the institutionwill be required to recalculate theapplicant’s Federal Pell Grant anddisburse any additional funds, ifadditional funds are payable. If theapplicant’s Federal Pell Grant will bereduced as a result <strong>of</strong> verification, theinstitution will be required to eliminateany overpayment by adjustingsubsequent disbursements orreimbursing the program account byrequiring the applicant to return theoverpayment or making restitution fromits own funds (see § 668.59(b)(2)(ii)).Section 668.59(c) provides that, forthe subsidized student financialassistance programs, excluding theFederal Pell Grant Program, if anapplicant’s FAFSA information changesas a result <strong>of</strong> verification, the institutionmust recalculate the applicant’s EFCand adjust the applicant’s financial aidpackage on the basis <strong>of</strong> the EFC on thecorrected SAR or ISIR.With the exception <strong>of</strong> minor technicaledits, § 668.59(d), which describes theconsequences <strong>of</strong> a change in anapplicant’s FAFSA information, remainssubstantively the same as current§ 668.59(d).Finally, we have removed current§ 668.59(e), the provision that requiresan institution to refer to the <strong>Department</strong>unresolved disputes over the accuracy
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations66941WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES2<strong>of</strong> information provided by theapplicant if the applicant received fundson the basis <strong>of</strong> that information.Both individuals (students) andinstitutions will be making correctionsto FAFSA information as a result <strong>of</strong> theverification process. We estimate that 30percent <strong>of</strong> the 17,000,000 applicants or5,100,000 individuals (students) will beselected for verification. Of those5,100,000 individuals, students willsubmit, on average, 1.4 changes inFAFSA information as a result <strong>of</strong>verification for 7,140,000 changes,which will take an average <strong>of</strong> .12 hours(7 minutes) per change, increasingburden to individuals by 856,800 hours.We estimate that institutions willneed to submit 10,200,000 changes inFAFSA information as a result <strong>of</strong>verification (that is, 5,100,000individuals selected for verificationmultiplied by 2.0 changes, which iswhat we estimate will be the average perindividual).Of the estimated total 10,200,000changes, we estimate that 3,774,000changes to FAFSA information as aresult <strong>of</strong> verification will occur atproprietary institutions, which will takean average <strong>of</strong> .12 hours (7 minutes) perchange, increasing burden by 452,880hours.Of the estimated total 10,200,000changes, we estimate that 3,060,000changes to FAFSA information as aresult <strong>of</strong> verification will occur atprivate non-pr<strong>of</strong>it institutions, whichwill take an average <strong>of</strong> .12 hours (7minutes) per change, increasing burdenby 367,200 hours.Of the estimated total 10,200,000changes, we estimate that 3,366,000changes to FAFSA information as aresult <strong>of</strong> verification will occur at publicinstitutions, which will take an average<strong>of</strong> .12 hours (7 minutes) per change,increasing burden by 403,920 hours.Collectively, therefore, the finalregulatory changes reflected in § 668.59will increase for individuals andinstitutions by 2,080,800 hours in OMBControl Number 1845–0041.Section 668.144—Application for TestApprovalWe have clarified and expanded therequirements in current §§ 668.143 and668.144. In addition, we haveconsolidated all <strong>of</strong> the requirements fortest approval in one section, § 668.144.Paragraphs (a) and (b) <strong>of</strong> § 668.144describe the general requirement for testpublishers and States to submit to theSecretary any test they wish to haveapproved under subpart J <strong>of</strong> part 668.Paragraph (c) <strong>of</strong> § 668.144 describes theinformation that a test publisher mustinclude with its application for approval<strong>of</strong> a test. Paragraph (d) <strong>of</strong> § 668.144describes the information a State mustinclude with its application when itsubmits a test to the Secretary forapproval.Section 668.144(c)(16) will requiretest publishers to include in theirapplications a description <strong>of</strong> their testadministrator certification process.Under § 668.144(c)(17), we will requiretest publishers to include in theirapplications, a description <strong>of</strong> the testanomaly analysis the test publisher willconduct and submit to the Secretary.Finally, § 668.144(c)(18) will requiretest publishers to include in theirapplications a description <strong>of</strong> the types<strong>of</strong> accommodations available forindividuals with disabilities, includinga description <strong>of</strong> the process used toidentify and report whenaccommodations for individuals withdisabilities were provided.We have added § 668.144(d) todescribe what States must include intheir test submissions to the Secretary.While this provision replaces thecontent in current § 668.143, itslanguage has been revised to be parallel,where appropriate, to the test publishersubmission requirements in current§ 668.144. In addition to making theserequirements parallel, § 668.144(d) alsoincludes the new requirements to beadded to the test publisher submissions.A description <strong>of</strong> those new provisionsfollows:Both test publishers and States will berequired to submit a description <strong>of</strong> theirtest administrator certification processthat indicates how the test publisher orState, as applicable, will determine thata test administrator has the necessarytraining, knowledge, skills and integrityto test students in accordance withrequirements and how the test publisheror the State will determine that the testadministrator has the ability andfacilities to keep its test secure againstdisclosure or release (see§ 668.144(c)(16) (test publishers) and§ 668.144(d)(7) (States)).We estimate that a test publisher andState will, on average, take 2.5 hours todevelop its process to establish that atest administrator has the necessarytraining, knowledge, skills and integrityto administer ability-to-benefit (ATB)tests and then to report that process tothe Secretary.We estimate that the burdenassociated with the currently approvedeight (8) ATB tests will increase for thetest publishers and States by 20 hours.The regulations will require both testpublishers and States to submit adescription <strong>of</strong> the test anomaly analysisthey will conduct. This descriptionmust include a description <strong>of</strong> how theyVerDate Mar2010 14:10 Oct 28, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29OCR2.SGM 29OCR2will identify potential test irregularitiesand make a determination that testirregularities have occurred; anexplanation <strong>of</strong> corrective action to betaken in the event <strong>of</strong> test irregularities;and information on when and how theSecretary, test administrator, andinstitutions will be notified if a testadministrator is decertified (see§ 668.144(c)(17) (test publishers) and§ 668.144(d)(8) (States)).We estimate that each test publisherand State will, on average, take 75 hoursto develop its test anomaly process, toestablish its test anomaly analysis(where it explains its test irregularitydetection process including itsdecertification <strong>of</strong> test administratorprocess) and to establish its reportingprocess to the Secretary. We estimatethat the burden associated with thecurrently approved eight (8) ATB testswill increase for the test publishers andStates by 600 hours.Under § 668.144(c)(18) and (d)(9)respectively, both test publishers andStates will be required to describe thetypes <strong>of</strong> accommodations available forindividuals with disabilities, and theprocess for a test administrator toidentify and report to the test publisherwhen accommodations for individualswith disabilities were provided. Weestimate that test publishers and Stateswill, on average, take 1 hour to developand describe to the Secretary the types<strong>of</strong> accommodations available toindividuals with disabilities, to describethe process the test administrator willuse to support the identification <strong>of</strong> thedisability and to develop the process toreport when accommodations will beused.We estimate that the burdenassociated with the currently approvedeight (8) ATB tests will increase for thecurrent test publishers by 8 hours.Collectively, the final regulatorychanges in § 668.144 will increaseburden for test publishers and States by628 hours in OMB 1845–0049.Section 668.150—Agreement Betweenthe Secretary and a Test-Publisher or aStateSection 668.150 provides that States,as well as test publishers, must enterinto agreements with the Secretary inorder to have their tests approved.We also have revised this section torequire both test publishers and Statesto comply with a number <strong>of</strong> newrequirements that will be added to theagreement with the Secretary.These requirements will include:Requiring the test administrators thatthey certify to provide them with certaininformation about whether they havebeen decertified (see § 668.150(b)(2)).
- Page 1 and 2:
Friday,October 29, 2010Part IIDepar
- Page 3 and 4:
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209
- Page 6 and 7:
66836 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 8 and 9:
66838 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 10 and 11:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 12 and 13:
66842 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 14 and 15:
66844 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 16 and 17:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 18 and 19:
66848 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 20 and 21:
66850 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 22 and 23:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 24 and 25:
66854 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 26 and 27:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 28 and 29:
66858 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 30 and 31:
66860 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 32 and 33:
66862 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 34 and 35:
66864 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 36 and 37:
66866 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 38 and 39:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 40 and 41:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 42 and 43:
66872 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 44 and 45:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 46 and 47:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 48 and 49:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 50 and 51:
66880 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 52 and 53:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 54 and 55:
66884 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 56 and 57:
66886 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 58 and 59:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 60 and 61: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 62 and 63: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 64 and 65: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 66 and 67: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 68 and 69: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 70 and 71: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 72 and 73: 66902 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 74 and 75: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 76 and 77: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 78 and 79: 66908 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 80 and 81: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 82 and 83: 66912 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 84 and 85: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 86 and 87: 66916 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 88 and 89: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 90 and 91: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 92 and 93: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 94 and 95: 66924 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 96 and 97: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 98 and 99: 66928 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 100 and 101: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 102 and 103: 66932 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 104 and 105: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 106 and 107: 66936 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 108 and 109: 66938 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 112 and 113: 66942 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 114 and 115: 66944 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 116 and 117: 66946 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 118 and 119: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 120 and 121: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 122 and 123: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 124 and 125: 66954 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 126 and 127: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 128 and 129: 66958 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 130 and 131: 66960 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 132 and 133: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 134 and 135: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 136 and 137: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD wit
- Page 138 and 139: 66968 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 140 and 141: 66970 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 142 and 143: 66972 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N
- Page 144 and 145: 66974 Federal Register / Vol. 75, N