13.07.2015 Views

Report of the Montpelier City Council's Citizen Budget Review ...

Report of the Montpelier City Council's Citizen Budget Review ...

Report of the Montpelier City Council's Citizen Budget Review ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2: View <strong>City</strong> and staff responses to <strong>the</strong> Matrix report by going to <strong>Montpelier</strong>-vt.org.Click “View <strong>City</strong> Meetings” in left hand menu. Then, go to upper right hand box andclick “<strong>City</strong> Council.” When <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> meetings appears, click on August 10, 2011 tosee <strong>the</strong> agenda. Click on “Matrix Recommendations” to hear responses from <strong>City</strong>.Planning Subcommittee Recommendations1. The <strong>City</strong> Manager, Planning Director and <strong>City</strong> Council should complete <strong>the</strong>Matrix recommendation to hold a work session to review Planning Departmentservices and <strong>the</strong>n establish priorities prior to allocating necessary resources.(Matrix <strong>Report</strong> 10.2 (3)) <strong>City</strong> Council should consider <strong>the</strong> Matrix finding that <strong>the</strong>heavy emphasis on special projects diverts attention from core planningfunctions.“The project team would recommend, prior to making any increases in staffing levels, that <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>Manager and Planning Director undertake a Planning work session with <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> Council to discuss<strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> effort and time resources allocated to <strong>the</strong>se special projects. The Council should beresponsible for establishing <strong>the</strong> commitment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> to conduct <strong>the</strong>se special projects/efforts,establishing <strong>the</strong> relative priority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se activities, and setting parameters for staff time and resourcesto be dedicated to <strong>the</strong>m. From this effort, <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> Planning Director should develop an annual workplan setting forth <strong>the</strong> core services to be provided and <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> special projects (andassociated resources – staff or external) that will be supported by <strong>the</strong> Planning Department.”(Matrix <strong>Report</strong>, pg. 87)This Matrix recommendation remains incomplete and that is <strong>of</strong> concern to <strong>the</strong>subcommittee. It states in <strong>the</strong> Matrix Status Update 10.2 (3) that <strong>the</strong> PlanningDepartment’s annual work plan for FY13 was completed without this review. (SeeAppendix Matrix 1) It is noted as high priority.2. Following a work session with <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> Manager and <strong>the</strong> Planning Director,<strong>City</strong> Council should establish <strong>the</strong> commitment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> to conduct specialprojects, establish a process and procedure (including <strong>the</strong> Council’s approval<strong>of</strong> individual Project Charters) for formalizing <strong>the</strong> city’s commitment <strong>of</strong>resources as well as <strong>the</strong>ir relative priority, including establishing parametersfor staff time and resources to be dedicated to <strong>the</strong>m. (Matrix <strong>Report</strong>, 10.2 (3))While commending <strong>the</strong> Planning Department for certain aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir work, Matrixalso noted:“However, in this Department, more than any o<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re have been many “specialprojects” and efforts assigned to (or assumed by) staff that fall outside what would typically be foundin a municipal Planning Department for a community <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>Montpelier</strong>. This special project (sic)all have value and importance to <strong>the</strong> community, but <strong>the</strong> project team has noted that <strong>the</strong>y divertsignificant resources and focus away from <strong>the</strong> core services provided – with a noticeable impact onboth staff and <strong>the</strong> attention given to <strong>the</strong>se services. The long-term focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> department cannotcontinue, if <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> wishes to provide a high level <strong>of</strong> services on “core planning functions” withoutei<strong>the</strong>r a reduction in <strong>the</strong> number and time spent on special projects or an increase in staff.” (Matrix<strong>Report</strong>, p.87)This recommendation highlights <strong>the</strong> Matrix focus on decision-making at <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>Council level, with staff input. Coming out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Matrix concern that time spent onspecial projects diminishes <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> efforts on core planning functions, isPage 11 <strong>of</strong> 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!