Argentina, Bulgaria, Colombia, and Turkey; however, the youth impact isunknown. In Colombia, the subsidy program benefited more than 100,000workers, but the program was stopped due to low uptake among employers.Subsidized internships for tertiary students mainly cater to the upper incomegroups and result in being regressive. The governments of Rwanda and Tunisiaare subsidizing internships in the public and private sector for universitygraduates (IEG 2012a; IEG 2012b; IEG 2012c; IEG 2012d). Findings from Tunisiasuggest very low placement rates at below 15 percent in disadvantagedregions compared to the OECD benchmark placement rate of 80 percent for onthe-jobtraining programs (World Bank 2011).Public works programs provide short-term employment. These programs havebeen recommended by the Bank in rural areas. In Europe, the employmenteffect of public works programs, which form part of ALMPs, is negative foryouth and scores below other interventions, including wage subsidies andskills training programs (Kluve 2010). Van Reenen (2003) finds a positiveemployment effect of the public works “environmental task force,” whichis part of the U.K. New Deal program. The Bank supported public worksprograms for all age groups in Argentina, Bulgaria, Colombia, El Salvador,Kenya, and Turkey. Impact evaluations in Argentina and Colombia only reportshort-term positive income effects related to the income transfer received,but no information on post-program employment. Various Bank reportsrecommend self-targeted, low-wage public works programs in rural areasinstead of the high-cost and poorly targeted active labor market programs.The coverage of Active Labor Market <strong>Programs</strong> is generally thorough andsystematic in the Bank’s analytical program. Much of the analytic workreviewed (appendix B) added value through the systematic treatment ofALMPs. Some reports describe and analyze the range of programs that areavailable. In the Kosovo report, for example, a large number of donors haveeach been supporting different ALMPs. The report analyzes each of theseprograms, describing how they operate and reporting data on cost perbeneficiary and employment impact. The Ghana study provides a separatepaper evaluating the National <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Employment</strong> Program and deals withcost-effectiveness issues.Few Bank reports focus explicitly on rural youth and on youth employmentopportunities in the agriculture and agribusiness sectors although themajority of low-income youth live in rural areas. In the Africa region, analyticwork tends to focus on formal employment in the urban areas, where politicalinterest and the data can be found. Few reports examine youth employmentin rural low-income areas. In Africa, it is most likely that youth will continueto be absorbed in agriculture, non-farm work, or self-employment. Too littleis known about what this implies. The Bank could consider studies on thework and earnings situation of youth in agriculture and off-farm activities,and examine rural growth policy and investment to inform future lending foryouth employment programs.40 <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Employment</strong> <strong>Programs</strong>
Smoothing School-to-Work Transition and Job Mobility (L)Although little is known from Bank support, evidence from the OECD andmiddle-income countries suggests adding school-to-work interventions toskills building increases the employment effect of skills building in a positivegrowth context. In the U.K. New Deal program, for example, unemployedyouth enter a four-month “gateway” with a personal advisor who assists inthe job search. The gateway significantly raised transition to employment.If still unemployed after the gateway period, youth either have to enroll insecond-chance education or in subsidized job placement (van Reenen 2003;Blundell and others 2004).The U.S. Center for <strong>Employment</strong> Training (CET) keeps youth in training foremployment-relevant skills until they find a position. They are assisted in theprocess by a counselor (Miller and others 2003). The U.S. Job Corps is a multiinterventionprogram for disadvantaged youth with vocationally focusedtraining and job placement assistance in a residential setting. Participationincreases educational attainment, reduces criminal activity, and increasesearnings. However, the job placement service was weak and strengtheningit could enhance program results (Schochet and others 2008; Lee 2009). Apositive growth environment supported the success of these programs.Although 70 percent of Bank projects support “improving information onthe labor market,” little is known about how accessible and helpful jobinformation is to job seekers, particularly in low-income areas with fewformal sector jobs. Only in the case of Turkey did the analytic work examinethis topic in depth. Even so, it is an area often supported by Bank lending(figure 2.2). The analysis of Bank reports identifies extensive coverage of theeducation system, whereas the school-to-work transition represents a gap inthe analytical framework of youth employment.Job search assistance, better information, and on-the–job training helpedreintegrate ex-soldiers in the former Yugoslavia. In Bosnia and Herzegovinafrom 1996–1999, the Bank supported the re-integration of 300,000 excombatantsinto the workforce, among them 50,000 youth. The programincluded a municipal-level labor market information system with jobvacancies and job seeker registration, education and retraining services withcounseling, and a job-finding service. An impact evaluation found youth hadthe smallest program impacts, though still significant, with an increase in28 percentage points in employment and a 42 DM (Deutsch Mark) increase inmonthly income (Benus and others 2001).Without tracer surveys, little is known about the employment and earningseffects of job search assistance. The Bank supported job search assistancein 40 percent of 90 projects, including in Armenia, Bulgaria, El Salvador,Maldives, and Turkey. However, only a few projects report informationon job placement rates. In Honduras, the employment service reports a33 percent placement rate for youth. In Tunisia, the employment serviceWhat is the Evidence on the Effectiveness of Support to <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Employment</strong>? 41
- Page 5 and 6:
Youth EmploymentProgramsAn Evaluati
- Page 8 and 9:
The Bank’s Impact Evaluations on
- Page 10 and 11:
LACLICLILMBAMENANEETNGOOECDPADPCRPD
- Page 12 and 13:
IEG management and colleagues provi
- Page 14 and 15:
Youth Employment ChallengesIn gener
- Page 16 and 17:
implemented 12 of the 90 operations
- Page 18 and 19:
Kenya, entrepreneurship training fo
- Page 20 and 21:
• Help countries design intervent
- Page 22 and 23:
support to youth employment program
- Page 24 and 25: tive rules on hiring and firing as
- Page 26 and 27: Management Action RecordIEG Finding
- Page 28 and 29: IEG Findings and ConclusionsIEG Rec
- Page 30 and 31: IEG Findings and ConclusionsIEG Rec
- Page 33 and 34: Report to the Board from the Commit
- Page 35: could have focused more on the lack
- Page 38 and 39: • Chapter Highlights• High yout
- Page 40 and 41: and can afford to wait for a better
- Page 42 and 43: ConsequencesEarly unemployment is s
- Page 44 and 45: ReferencesBegg, David, Stanley Fisc
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 2What Are the World Bank an
- Page 49 and 50: The strength and openness of the ec
- Page 51 and 52: Interventions to Address Youth Empl
- Page 53 and 54: commitments by the International Ba
- Page 55: Figure 2.2Top 12 Youth Employment I
- Page 58 and 59: • the substitution effect of bett
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 3What Is the Evidence that
- Page 63 and 64: school dropouts early. Learning opp
- Page 65 and 66: evaluations on what works best to p
- Page 67 and 68: Agriculture, Health, Education, Soc
- Page 69: Holzmann, Robert. 2007. MILES: Iden
- Page 72 and 73: • Chapter Highlights• The Bank
- Page 78 and 79: facilitated 69 foreign work contrac
- Page 80 and 81: awarded vouchers to about 1,000 out
- Page 82 and 83: • Comparing the interventions ana
- Page 84 and 85: Hjort, Jonas, Michael Kremer, Isaac
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 5Recommendations
- Page 89: farm self-employment and employment
- Page 92 and 93: This appendix presents the factors
- Page 94 and 95: Organization for Standardization (I
- Page 96 and 97: Box A.3Youth as a Demographic Divid
- Page 98 and 99: Table A.1Types of Youth Employment
- Page 100 and 101: Notes1. This phenomenon could be le
- Page 103 and 104: Appendix BEvaluation Data Sources a
- Page 105 and 106: Identification and Analysis of the
- Page 107 and 108: • Making the labor market work be
- Page 109 and 110: Table B.3ApprovalFYList of Projects
- Page 111 and 112: Table B.3ApprovalFYList of Projects
- Page 113 and 114: Table B.4(I)nvestmentClimate(L)abor
- Page 115 and 116: Table B.6List of Economic Sector Wo
- Page 117 and 118: ment, Private Sector Development, a
- Page 119 and 120: Other evaluations with outcome meas
- Page 121 and 122: Table B.8CountryFranceKenyaMexicoPa
- Page 123 and 124: Table B.8CountryUnitedStatesYouth E
- Page 125 and 126:
Table B.8CountryEuropeancountriesLa
- Page 127 and 128:
Bidani, Benu, Niels-Hugo Blunch, Ch
- Page 129:
Training Replication Sites.” Manp
- Page 132 and 133:
Appendix C provides additional info
- Page 134 and 135:
Box C.2Global Partnership for Youth
- Page 136 and 137:
ReferencesAedo, Cristian, and Ian W
- Page 138 and 139:
This appendix provides additional i
- Page 140 and 141:
The number of projects and total le
- Page 142 and 143:
Figure D.2World Bank Youth Employme
- Page 144 and 145:
Table D.5Intervention categoryYouth
- Page 146 and 147:
Table D.7Prevalence of Project Obje
- Page 148 and 149:
Table D.9Target Groups of Project O
- Page 150 and 151:
Table D.11Type of Interventions Sup
- Page 152 and 153:
Table D.13 Frequently Used Youth Em
- Page 154 and 155:
In sum, this portfolio review chapt
- Page 156 and 157:
approach in Turkey and Sierra Leone
- Page 158 and 159:
This appendix presents a detailed a
- Page 160 and 161:
to Finance business line, over a si
- Page 162 and 163:
entrepreneurship projects. Investme
- Page 164 and 165:
IFC has three types of investments
- Page 166 and 167:
Box E.1Africa Schools ProgramIFC su
- Page 168 and 169:
Box E.2e4e Initiative for Arab Yout
- Page 170 and 171:
3. IFC’s Advisory Services corpor
- Page 172 and 173:
This appendix presents lessons for
- Page 174 and 175:
Labor Market RegulationsLabor marke
- Page 176 and 177:
to the definition of unemployment b
- Page 178 and 179:
In post-conflict zones with small f
- Page 180 and 181:
Public works programs in Bank proje
- Page 182 and 183:
marginal impact of school-to-work t
- Page 184 and 185:
of the program. However, results fo
- Page 186 and 187:
• Weak results frameworks on the
- Page 188 and 189:
sustainability. Zambia’s TEVET pr
- Page 190 and 191:
unemployed youth registered with th
- Page 192 and 193:
for Employment and Entrepreneurship
- Page 194 and 195:
Note1. The Technical and Vocational
- Page 196 and 197:
Ibarraran, Pablo, and David Rosas.
- Page 198 and 199:
World Bank. 2012a. “World Bank an
- Page 200 and 201:
IEG’s Youth Employment Evaluation
- Page 202 and 203:
Figure G.1 Facebook Demographics Ba
- Page 204 and 205:
Figure G.3Results on Rural Employme
- Page 207 and 208:
BibliographyBarrera, Felipe, Paul G
- Page 209 and 210:
———. 2011b. Migration and Rem
- Page 211 and 212:
The World Bank GroupWorking for a W