Youth Employment Programs - Independent Evaluation Group
Youth Employment Programs - Independent Evaluation Group Youth Employment Programs - Independent Evaluation Group
to the definition of unemployment benefits and contributed to a continuousbudget surplus in the unemployment fund for three years.IFC has supported the implementation of labor market regulations throughthe Better Work Program. Since 2005, IFC has been working in partnershipwith the International Labor Organization to improve both compliance withlabor standards and competitiveness in global supply chains in variousindustries, such as garment/footwear, plantations, electronic equipment, andlight manufacturing. IFC supported, with the partnership of multinationalclothing retailer Gap Inc., the first supervisory skills training (SST)program—Better Factories Cambodia for garment industry supervisors.Following the Cambodia experience, IFC launched the Better Work programin 2007 and replicated the program in Vietnam, Jordan, Haiti, and Indonesia.The program does not have a youth-specific target, but the demographicdata in Haiti, Indonesia, and Jordan indicate that the main beneficiaries ofthe program are women (between 70 to 90 percent) and youth, aged 15–30(around 60 percent). Results from a recent randomized evaluation show a 25percent higher awareness of production targets, and a 10 percent increase inoutputs based on training provided to supervisors in improving supervisorworkerrelationships and compliance with standards.Youth Entrepreneurship ProgramsEntrepreneurship training has demonstrated positive impacts for somegroups, but limited effects on business performance. In the United States, theGrowing America through Entrepreneurship (GATE) project provides trainingand business counseling. GATE increased the likelihood of starting a businessby 3 to 5 percentage points, with significantly lower effects for women, butno impact on income and business performance (Fairlie and others 2012). InBosnia, Bruhn and Zia (2011) found that while the business and financialliteracy training program did not affect business survival or performance,it significantly improved business practices. Thus, the lack of businessknowledge may not be the key constraint to new entrepreneurship; othermuch stronger constraints to business development and growth need to beaddressed first, or as part of a more comprehensive support program.Entrepreneurship training has unclear effects in Mexico. Mexico’s trainingprogram “Probecat “provides a scholarship equivalent to the minimum salaryto young beneficiaries to participate in a three-month training course forself-employment. An impact evaluation (Delajara and others 2006) finds noclear effect on employment or wages for the self-employed. However, on-thejobtraining in larger firms of unemployed youth leads to better employmentand income outcomes than entrepreneurship training. Young women werefound to have benefited most from the entrepreneurship program.Comprehensive entrepreneurship programs comprising training, mentoring,networking, and microcredit are more likely to be effective. Karlan andValdivia (2007) conducted a randomized study offering female clients of140 Youth Employment Programs
a microfinance institute in Peru entrepreneurship training in addition toweekly or monthly banking meetings. The group that got entrepreneurshiptraining improved business practices and revenues and had greater repaymentrates, suggesting that client outcomes can be improved by combiningentrepreneurial training and coaching with access to credit.The Bank supported entrepreneurship training in a number of countries.Early results from impact evaluations suggest negligible effects in Tunisiaand positive effects for young entrepreneurs in rural areas in Uganda andColombia. The Tunisia “Turning Thesis into Enterprise” program offersbusiness training and coaching to undergraduate students who graduate witha business plan and submit their plan to a competition. Participants reporta 3 percentage point increase in their probability to be self-employed (about24 additional self-employed) from a low baseline of 4 percent. The resultwas stronger for men than for women. The training did not affect students’probability of finding a job or increasing their earnings (Premand and others2012). In Colombia, the Social Development Policy Loan (DPL) (P106708)supported the Young Rural Entrepreneurs training programs (Jóvenes RuralesEmprendedores), which increased participants’ employment rate by 13–14percent (Castañeda and others 2010). In Uganda, the Bank NUSAF1 projectused a $2.6 million Japanese Social Development Grant to do a pilot test ofyouth employment opportunities in collaboration with World Vision. Findingsfrom an impact evaluation (box F.2 and table F.1) led to the scale-up of theYouth Opportunity Program and continuous support to young entrepreneursunder the follow-up Bank project, the Second Northern Uganda Social ActionFund (NUSAF2).Box F.2Midterm Evaluation of Uganda Youth Opportunities Program FindsIncreased Earnings and Employment from an Unconditional Cash-Transfer to Finance Non-Formal Skills TrainingUganda’s Youth Opportunity Program provides unconditional cash grants to youth groups forinvestment in training or self-employment. Groups of 20 to 30 youth are asked to submit aproposal for purchasing skills training, tools, and other materials required to start an enterprise.Nearly 80 percent of participants enrolled in training (mainly tailoring and carpentry),and 13 percent re-enrolled in secondary school. Two years after the cash transfer, two-thirdsof the participants are engaged in skilled work, mainly self-employed, compared to just onethirdof the control group. The program doubled hours of employment and increased earningsand savings for youth by nearly 50 percent relative to the control group, with similar resultsfor male and female youth. Participants rated the value of their business assets at $390—morethan twice as high than that of the control group. The rate of return of project investment was35 percent per year, which compares favorably with commercial lending rates to small firms.Findings suggest limited access to credit is a major constraint to participation in training andemployment.Source: Blattman and others 2011.Appendix F: Lessons from Impact Evaluations and World Bank Group Operations 141
- Page 125 and 126: Table B.8CountryEuropeancountriesLa
- Page 127 and 128: Bidani, Benu, Niels-Hugo Blunch, Ch
- Page 129: Training Replication Sites.” Manp
- Page 132 and 133: Appendix C provides additional info
- Page 134 and 135: Box C.2Global Partnership for Youth
- Page 136 and 137: ReferencesAedo, Cristian, and Ian W
- Page 138 and 139: This appendix provides additional i
- Page 140 and 141: The number of projects and total le
- Page 142 and 143: Figure D.2World Bank Youth Employme
- Page 144 and 145: Table D.5Intervention categoryYouth
- Page 146 and 147: Table D.7Prevalence of Project Obje
- Page 148 and 149: Table D.9Target Groups of Project O
- Page 150 and 151: Table D.11Type of Interventions Sup
- Page 152 and 153: Table D.13 Frequently Used Youth Em
- Page 154 and 155: In sum, this portfolio review chapt
- Page 156 and 157: approach in Turkey and Sierra Leone
- Page 158 and 159: This appendix presents a detailed a
- Page 160 and 161: to Finance business line, over a si
- Page 162 and 163: entrepreneurship projects. Investme
- Page 164 and 165: IFC has three types of investments
- Page 166 and 167: Box E.1Africa Schools ProgramIFC su
- Page 168 and 169: Box E.2e4e Initiative for Arab Yout
- Page 170 and 171: 3. IFC’s Advisory Services corpor
- Page 172 and 173: This appendix presents lessons for
- Page 174 and 175: Labor Market RegulationsLabor marke
- Page 178 and 179: In post-conflict zones with small f
- Page 180 and 181: Public works programs in Bank proje
- Page 182 and 183: marginal impact of school-to-work t
- Page 184 and 185: of the program. However, results fo
- Page 186 and 187: • Weak results frameworks on the
- Page 188 and 189: sustainability. Zambia’s TEVET pr
- Page 190 and 191: unemployed youth registered with th
- Page 192 and 193: for Employment and Entrepreneurship
- Page 194 and 195: Note1. The Technical and Vocational
- Page 196 and 197: Ibarraran, Pablo, and David Rosas.
- Page 198 and 199: World Bank. 2012a. “World Bank an
- Page 200 and 201: IEG’s Youth Employment Evaluation
- Page 202 and 203: Figure G.1 Facebook Demographics Ba
- Page 204 and 205: Figure G.3Results on Rural Employme
- Page 207 and 208: BibliographyBarrera, Felipe, Paul G
- Page 209 and 210: ———. 2011b. Migration and Rem
- Page 211 and 212: The World Bank GroupWorking for a W
a microfinance institute in Peru entrepreneurship training in addition toweekly or monthly banking meetings. The group that got entrepreneurshiptraining improved business practices and revenues and had greater repaymentrates, suggesting that client outcomes can be improved by combiningentrepreneurial training and coaching with access to credit.The Bank supported entrepreneurship training in a number of countries.Early results from impact evaluations suggest negligible effects in Tunisiaand positive effects for young entrepreneurs in rural areas in Uganda andColombia. The Tunisia “Turning Thesis into Enterprise” program offersbusiness training and coaching to undergraduate students who graduate witha business plan and submit their plan to a competition. Participants reporta 3 percentage point increase in their probability to be self-employed (about24 additional self-employed) from a low baseline of 4 percent. The resultwas stronger for men than for women. The training did not affect students’probability of finding a job or increasing their earnings (Premand and others2012). In Colombia, the Social Development Policy Loan (DPL) (P106708)supported the Young Rural Entrepreneurs training programs (Jóvenes RuralesEmprendedores), which increased participants’ employment rate by 13–14percent (Castañeda and others 2010). In Uganda, the Bank NUSAF1 projectused a $2.6 million Japanese Social Development Grant to do a pilot test ofyouth employment opportunities in collaboration with World Vision. Findingsfrom an impact evaluation (box F.2 and table F.1) led to the scale-up of the<strong>Youth</strong> Opportunity Program and continuous support to young entrepreneursunder the follow-up Bank project, the Second Northern Uganda Social ActionFund (NUSAF2).Box F.2Midterm <strong>Evaluation</strong> of Uganda <strong>Youth</strong> Opportunities Program FindsIncreased Earnings and <strong>Employment</strong> from an Unconditional Cash-Transfer to Finance Non-Formal Skills TrainingUganda’s <strong>Youth</strong> Opportunity Program provides unconditional cash grants to youth groups forinvestment in training or self-employment. <strong>Group</strong>s of 20 to 30 youth are asked to submit aproposal for purchasing skills training, tools, and other materials required to start an enterprise.Nearly 80 percent of participants enrolled in training (mainly tailoring and carpentry),and 13 percent re-enrolled in secondary school. Two years after the cash transfer, two-thirdsof the participants are engaged in skilled work, mainly self-employed, compared to just onethirdof the control group. The program doubled hours of employment and increased earningsand savings for youth by nearly 50 percent relative to the control group, with similar resultsfor male and female youth. Participants rated the value of their business assets at $390—morethan twice as high than that of the control group. The rate of return of project investment was35 percent per year, which compares favorably with commercial lending rates to small firms.Findings suggest limited access to credit is a major constraint to participation in training andemployment.Source: Blattman and others 2011.Appendix F: Lessons from Impact <strong>Evaluation</strong>s and World Bank <strong>Group</strong> Operations 141