13.07.2015 Views

Youth Employment Programs - Independent Evaluation Group

Youth Employment Programs - Independent Evaluation Group

Youth Employment Programs - Independent Evaluation Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table B.8CountryFranceKenyaMexicoPanamaPeruPortugalRomaniaSri Lanka<strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Employment</strong> Impact <strong>Evaluation</strong>s<strong>Evaluation</strong>study Interventions Target groupBrodatyand others(2001)Hicks andothers(2011)Delajaraand others(2006)Ibarraranand Rosas(2007)Chongand Galdo(2006)Díaz andJaramillo(2006)Cardoso(2009)Malamudand Pop-Eleches(2010)de Meland others(2010)Fostering jobcreation/workopportunitiesWage subsidiesSkillsdevelopmentRemedial TVETSkillsdevelopmentTraining subsidiesand vouchersFostering jobcreation/workopportunitiesTraining inentrepreneurshipSkillsdevelopmentRemedial TVETSkillsdevelopmentWork-based TVETRemedial TVETSkillsdevelopmentWork-based TVETRemedial TVETSkillsdevelopmentWork-based TVETRemedial TVETFostering jobcreation/workopportunitiesRegulations to incentivizefirms tohire young people(minimum wage)SkillsdevelopmentImproving thequality of formalTVETFostering jobcreation/workopportunitiesWage subsidiesObservationperiod(cont.)<strong>Evaluation</strong>method<strong>Youth</strong> 1986–1988 Matchingestimators<strong>Youth</strong> 2008–2010 Ordinary leastsquareRandom/fixedeffect<strong>Youth</strong> 1999–2004 Propensityscore matchingSelectioncorrection<strong>Youth</strong> 2004–2005 MeandifferencesDynamicrandom coefficientlogitmodel<strong>Youth</strong> 1996–2004 Propensityscore matchingDifference indifference<strong>Youth</strong> 1999–2004 Propensityscore matchingDifference indifference<strong>Youth</strong> 1987–2005 Ordinary leastsquare<strong>Youth</strong> 1992–2002 Regressiondiscontinuity<strong>Employment</strong>effectVariesNegative(short-run)PositiveInsignificantPositive forfemalesNAPositiveNAInsignificant<strong>Youth</strong> 2008–2010 Description Positive NANANAEarningseffectPositiveInsignificantPositive forfemalesPositivePositiveAn overallwagepremiumand a flattertenure-earningsprofile(long-run)Insignificant(Continues on the following page.)Appendix B: <strong>Evaluation</strong> Data Sources and Methods 85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!