SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Environmental assessment has been included to some degree on most municipal andregional plans approved after January 1998 when the Planning and Building Act came intoeffect. The more recent examples, especially in relation to the assessment carried out formunicipal and regional plans, fulfil in principle the requirements of the EU directive97/11/EC. In the more recent examples, little or any baseline information is gatheredespecially for the assessment, and the impacts are appraised against selected objectives orcriteria (selected in each case) and the process follows closely the planning process asstipulated by the Planning and Building Act.5.6 The national planning frameworkAn overview of the national planning system5.6.1 Legal basisThe Icelandic planning system is stipulated by the Planning and Building Act 73/1997 andthe Planning Regulation 400/1998 (with changes 410/2002 and 47/2001). The Planning andBuilding Act is current under revision. Among the changes in the current proposal include alegal separation of the planning and building processes and a new emphasis on planning atthe national level and on sector planning. The first Icelandic planning Act dates from 1921and dealt with planning of ‘built-up areas’. According to the Act all municipalities should havecomprehensive municipal plans, but in 2000 many of those plans dated back to the 1980s,and even 1970s without having been revised (Theodόrsdόttir 2000). Following the firstPlanning Act of 1921 and the revision from 1964, in 1998 a totally renewed Planning andBuilding Act entered into force. This Act 73/1997 introduced two main changes to theplanning regulations: Firstly, the whole country became subject to planning control, not onlybuilt-up areas. Secondly, the responsibility for planning issues was formally moved fromnational level to the local authorities.At the early stages of the transposition of the SEA directive to Icelandic legislation, theSEA requirements were proposed to be an integrated part of the new Planning Act. Later onit was decided that SEA should be presented in a separate SEA Act. However, the linkageswith the planning system, as well as the planning legislation are strong, and the revision of thePlanning and Building Act 73/1997 is of prime importance for the implementation of SEA.5.6.2 Recent and proposed changes in the planning legislationCurrent proposals include a legal separation of the planning and building processes and a newemphasis on planning at the national level and on sector planning. The current Planning andBuilding Act 73/1997 came into force on January 1998. Among the changes introduced inthe Act were that main responsibility for land use planning moved from the state to themunicipalities. Furthermore, the call for the integration of environmental issues in planningwas given a legal basis in the Icelandic Planning and Building Act, as well as the promotion ofsustainable development that is among the overriding goals of the act.Main actorsThe municipalities hold the main responsibility for land use planning, while the responsibilityfor coordination, support and advice is placed at the national level with the Planning Agency.The Ministry of the Environment is responsible for physical planning in cooperation with thePlanning Agency which shall assist and guide municipalities in their planning work. Themunicipalities are responsible for the compulsory preparation of municipal and local(detailed) plans. The regional planning committees are responsible for the regional planningwhich are voluntary but encouraged in the Planning and Building Act no. 73/1997. Themunicipalities adopt the local, municipal and regional plans, but the municipal and regional72
plans shall also be approved by the Ministry of the Environment. Regional, municipal andlocal plans are all legally binding.Planning levelsAccording to the Planning and Building Act no.73/1997 (PBA) there is compulsory statutoryplanning at two governmental levels; the national and municipal levels. Planning at nationaland municipal level; i.e. development plans in the form of municipal comprehensive plansand detailed plans prepared by the municipalities, and sector plans at the national level.Regional plans, prepared by two or more local authorities are voluntary but encouraged bythe act. The SEA requirements apply to all plans stipulated by the PBA.Planning at the national levelThere is no formal physical planning at the national level in Iceland, but the ministriesprepare national strategies for the individual sectors such as transport and energy. Othernational planning instruments are parliamentary decisions regarding regional development,afforestation, soil protection programme etc. Although these plans are not stipulated by thePlanning and Building Act and are not a part of the physical planning system, they includedecisions that have considerable consequences for the development and preconditions forplanning in the countries’ different regions. An example of such a plan is the nationaltransport strategy and the national strategy for energy use and the national plan for natureprotection.Regional planningThere is no governmental level in Iceland, but the municipalities can partake in voluntarycooperation and prepare so-called regional plans, which are encouraged in the PBA. Theregional plans are in that way voluntary and cover two or more municipalities and stipulationsfor land use in the whole of the area.Planning at the municipal levelAccording to the Planning and Building Legislation all municipalities must prepare land useplans that cover the whole of the municipality and shall handle land use and development inthe municipality for twelve years ahead of time. The municipal plans shall be revised everyfourth year. Furthermore, the municipalities shall prepare detailed plans for areas wheredevelopment is proposed.73
Page 1 and 2:
sea in the context of land-useplann
Page 4 and 5:
Blekinge Institute of Technology Li
Page 7:
AcknowledgementsThis thesis has dev
Page 10 and 11:
CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION OF SEA TO TH
Page 13:
PART I - Introduction to the resear
Page 16 and 17:
In this research the introduction o
Page 18 and 19:
my studies and work in the area as
Page 20 and 21:
FIGURE 1.1. BASIC TYPES OF CASE-STU
Page 22 and 23:
• Process/Strategy Model; i.e. co
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2The SEA Directive 2001/42/
Page 27 and 28: was extended again to also encompas
Page 29 and 30: The plans and programmes referred t
Page 31 and 32: effects), with less attention given
Page 33 and 34: widespread voluntary application of
Page 35 and 36: assessment instruments such as Risk
Page 37 and 38: 3.1.4 The origins of SEA and its re
Page 39 and 40: 3.2 Relevance of planning theory fo
Page 41 and 42: development of its central ideas an
Page 43 and 44: aspects of environmental considerat
Page 45 and 46: FIGURE 3.2. SEA TOOLS IN RELATION T
Page 47: planning theory in respect of envir
Page 51 and 52: Chapter 4 Introduction of SEA to th
Page 53 and 54: to the ordinance (2005:356), the fo
Page 55 and 56: planning area and the 0-alternative
Page 57 and 58: 4.4 Preparation work for SEA applic
Page 59 and 60: Housing and Planning has argued tha
Page 61 and 62: Municipal comprehensive plans (öve
Page 63 and 64: 4.6.2 On-going legal revisionsOn-go
Page 65 and 66: municipal comprehensive plans (25 p
Page 67 and 68: A pilot study on impact assessment
Page 69: despite the committee’s suggestio
Page 72 and 73: esources, and the community, includ
Page 74 and 75: There amongst it shall be decided w
Page 76 and 77: Information made available in the r
Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
Page 105 and 106: system. This notion is reinforced b
Page 107 and 108: Who decides?The authorities respons
Page 109 and 110: plans at the municipal level (Impac
Page 111 and 112: experience of assessing the plan’
Page 113 and 114: preconditions for the introduction
Page 115 and 116: that the directive has spurred the
Page 117 and 118: the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
Page 121 and 122: importance of improved knowledge an
Page 123 and 124: At the same time HB has had access
Page 125 and 126: References and documentsAlfredsson,
Page 127 and 128: Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
Page 129 and 130:
Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating SEA
Page 131 and 132:
Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and
Page 133 and 134:
European Union’s publicationsEC (
Page 135 and 136:
English documents:Countryside Counc
show all

SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?