where the municipalities were given the responsibility of drawing up complete comprehensiveplans (Christoferson 2001:124). Other changes made by the reform in 1987 were to improvethe public’s opportunities to participate in the planning process, to simplify and modernisethe planning system and give a stronger emphasis on the social and economic considerationsin the processes of planning and building matters (Christoferson, 2001:121, Riksrevisionen2005:15). PBA underwent a thorough revision in 1996, which included e.g. furtherrequirements in regards to municipal comprehensive plans, includes their contents, revisionsand requirements on public consultation as a part of the preparation process.Main actorsAt central government level, the Ministry of the Environment is responsible forenvironmental, planning and building issues. The key governmental agencies are the NationalBoard of Housing, Building and Planning and the Swedish Environmental ProtectionAgency. At the regional level there are 21 County Administration Boards (CAB) thatinfluence spatial planning through guidance and can annul the decision made by a municipalauthority if national or inter-municipal interests are not being satisfied or that public healthand safety are being jeopardised. The CABs have certain planning responsibilities dedicatedfrom the national level, e.g. coordination of regional development, transportation andconsideration of interest of areas allocated as ‘areas of national interests’ (Alfredsson andWiman, 2001).Planning levelsNo comprehensive planning exists at the national level. However, at the national level policiesand sectoral development perspectives are prepared. At the regional level regional plans andregional development plans are guiding for planning at the lower administrative levels. Withregard to the statutory planning levels the municipal level if of key importance as the onlycompulsory planning level with regard to the preparation of municipal and detaileddevelopment plans. Hence, the municipalities exercise a so-called ‘planning monopoly’ withregard to comprehensive planning, which means that the municipality has primaryresponsibility for planning the use of land and water within a legal framework set andsupervised by national government. However, the municipal comprehensive planning level,albeit being obligatory, is merely indicative as regards development, whereas the detaileddevelopment plans are legally binding.Regional plans (Region plan)In the Planning and Building Act there is a provision for regional planning. The regional landuseplans shall be carried out on a voluntary basis and are non-binding. The regional plansshall guide and form the basis for decision on municipal comprehensive plans; detaileddevelopment plans and area regulations. The plan can, as appropriate for the region, set outthe main principles for the use of land and water, as well as it outlines the localisation ofbuilding and infrastructure. The responsibility for the planning activity carried out theregional level differs considerably within Sweden. County administrative boards (CABs) existin all areas. However, the CABs have been replaced by politically elected regional parliamentin two places, Region Skåne and Region Västra Götaland. In other areas cooperation existsbetween the municipalities and moreover, a formal cooperation, a regional association oflocal authorities can be appointed or a certain period of time. Those are approved by thegovernment. Hitherto regional planning, that meets the requirements of the PBA has onlybeen carried out in the region of Stockholm, where the Stockholm County Council has aspecial obligation under the PBA to act as a regional planning body through the Office ofRegional Planning and Urban Transportations.54
Municipal comprehensive plans (översiktsplan).According to the PBA, all municipalities must prepare a municipal comprehensive plan whichshall cover and apply to the whole of the area of the municipality. The plan is to guidedecisions regarding use of land and water. The comprehensive plans can be supplemented bya detailed comprehensive plan for a certain geographical area, such as city district or otherpopulation centres or specific sectors, such as wind power. Furthermore, the plan mustreflect how the municipality intends to take national interests into consideration inaccordance with national objectives, as expressed in the Environmental Code. The plan isnot binding for the authorities or individuals. For every four-yearly election period, themunicipal council is required to evaluate the plan and to decide whether it is necessary toreview the plan.Detailed development plans (detaljplan) are used for detailed control of land use and developmentin a certain site or an area. In contrast to the regional plan and the comprehensive plan, thedetailed development plan has a strong legal status and is binding for authorities andindividuals and sets the frame for building permissions. The main aims of the detaileddevelopment plans are both to regulate change in land use and development, as well as toensure the need for preservation of individual buildings and the natural and builtenvironment with regard to development.Special Area Regulations (områdebestämmelser) have a binding effect and can be applied withina defined area to ensure that the aims of the comprehensive plan can be achieved. Theregulations can be applied in areas without a detailed development plan, and are not ascomprehensive as detailed development plans. The special area regulations can be theprinciples for e.g. land use, size and density of development within a certain area.55
- Page 1 and 2:
sea in the context of land-useplann
- Page 4 and 5:
Blekinge Institute of Technology Li
- Page 7:
AcknowledgementsThis thesis has dev
- Page 10 and 11: CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION OF SEA TO TH
- Page 13: PART I - Introduction to the resear
- Page 16 and 17: In this research the introduction o
- Page 18 and 19: my studies and work in the area as
- Page 20 and 21: FIGURE 1.1. BASIC TYPES OF CASE-STU
- Page 22 and 23: • Process/Strategy Model; i.e. co
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2The SEA Directive 2001/42/
- Page 27 and 28: was extended again to also encompas
- Page 29 and 30: The plans and programmes referred t
- Page 31 and 32: effects), with less attention given
- Page 33 and 34: widespread voluntary application of
- Page 35 and 36: assessment instruments such as Risk
- Page 37 and 38: 3.1.4 The origins of SEA and its re
- Page 39 and 40: 3.2 Relevance of planning theory fo
- Page 41 and 42: development of its central ideas an
- Page 43 and 44: aspects of environmental considerat
- Page 45 and 46: FIGURE 3.2. SEA TOOLS IN RELATION T
- Page 47: planning theory in respect of envir
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 4 Introduction of SEA to th
- Page 53 and 54: to the ordinance (2005:356), the fo
- Page 55 and 56: planning area and the 0-alternative
- Page 57 and 58: 4.4 Preparation work for SEA applic
- Page 59: Housing and Planning has argued tha
- Page 63 and 64: 4.6.2 On-going legal revisionsOn-go
- Page 65 and 66: municipal comprehensive plans (25 p
- Page 67 and 68: A pilot study on impact assessment
- Page 69: despite the committee’s suggestio
- Page 72 and 73: esources, and the community, includ
- Page 74 and 75: There amongst it shall be decided w
- Page 76 and 77: Information made available in the r
- Page 78 and 79: Environmental assessment has been i
- Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
- Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
- Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
- Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
- Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
- Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
- Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
- Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
- Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
- Page 105 and 106: system. This notion is reinforced b
- Page 107 and 108: Who decides?The authorities respons
- Page 109 and 110: plans at the municipal level (Impac
- Page 111 and 112:
experience of assessing the plan’
- Page 113 and 114:
preconditions for the introduction
- Page 115 and 116:
that the directive has spurred the
- Page 117 and 118:
the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
- Page 121 and 122:
importance of improved knowledge an
- Page 123 and 124:
At the same time HB has had access
- Page 125 and 126:
References and documentsAlfredsson,
- Page 127 and 128:
Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
- Page 129 and 130:
Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating SEA
- Page 131 and 132:
Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and
- Page 133 and 134:
European Union’s publicationsEC (
- Page 135 and 136:
English documents:Countryside Counc