• Screening: decision on the need to carry out an environmental assessment (Article 11)• Consultation with regard to the need to carry out an environmental assessment (Article 6)• Transboundary consultation with regard to the potential impacts of the plan’s or the programme’simplementation in another country (Article 15)• Scoping of the environmental report (Article 12 – 13)• Consultation of the scoping of the environmental report. Decision son what the environmentalassessment shall include and which areas and effects are regarded most important to focus upon(Article 13)• Environmental assessment. Identify, describe and assess the expected considerable environmentalimpacts that the implementation of the plan or the programme, as well as the reasonable alternativewill convey. This shall also be described and compared to the baseline situation (Article 11).• Consultation on the environmental assessment. Carry out consultation with regard to the proposalof environmental assessment as well as the draft version of the plan or the programme’s proposal(Article 14 – 15).• Considerations of the environmental assessment and comments and viewpoints of theconsultations. Consider the environmental assessment as well as the comments/views receivedform the consultation before the plan or the programme is adopted or forms the basis forregulations (Article 16)• Adoption of the plan or the programme. Those who have participated in the consultation shall beinformed (Article 16)• Reporting of the environmental assessment in a separate summary (Article 16)• Follow-up (Article 18). The considerable environmental effects of the implementation of the plan orthe programme shall be followed-up with the aim of the authorities or the municipalities can takemeasures needed. According to the guidelines, existing monitoring programmes and planningcycles shall be used to the largest extent possible, and complemented as needed.FIGURE 4.1. MA<strong>IN</strong> STAGES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> ASSESSMENT PROCESS ACCORD<strong>IN</strong>G TO <strong>THE</strong> ENVIRONMENTAL CODE4.3.1 ScopingThe scope of the Environmental assessment, i.e. the what assessment shall cover and whichaspects and effects are considered to be important to focus upon shall be decided in ascoping process that is prescribed in articles 12 and 13 in the Environmental Code. Althoughthe aim of the scoping process is to identify relevant aspects, certain guidelines are presentedin article 13, i.e. that the environmental assessment report shall include information that is‘reasonable’ with regard to the assessment methods and current level of knowledge, the plan’sor the programme’s contents and the levels of detail, the public interest, and that certainissues can better be addressed in the context of other assessments.As a part of the scoping process certain consultation shall be carried out. Those areprescribed in article 13, chapter 6 of the Environmental Code and include that on themunicipality level, the municipality or the authority shall consult the municipality, themunicipalities or the CABs that will be affects by the plan or the programme. On the nationallevel the consultation shall be conducted with the Swedish Environmental Protection Agencyand other state authorities concerned. There is no requirement on consultation with thepublic at the scoping stage, however it is pointed out in the draft handbook (2006-11-29remissversion, Naturvårdsverket) that it can be valuable to conduct broader consultationregarding the scoping phase.4.3.2 Environmental reportingThe requirements on the contents of the Environmental report are described in chapter 6,articles 12-13 of the Environmental Code. The list of requirements include a summary of theobjectives of the plan or the programme, a description of the environmental status in the48
planning area and the 0-alternative, as well as significant environmental impacts that shall bedescribed and assessed. Furthermore, the assessment shall relate to the degree of and the typeof environmental impacts, as well as the environmental impacts that are uncertain and shallbe described and assessed with regard to the uncertainty. The environmental statement shallalso illustrate how the relevant environmental quality goals have been incorporated in theplan, e.g. the Swedish national environmental quality goals and their regional and localcounterparts. Measures to prevent and minimise negative environmental impacts shall beincluded, to the extent to which these can be controlled by the planning instrument inquestion. E.g. in the case of municipal comprehensive planning, the plan cannot, as such,guarantee measure to prevent or to minimise environmental impacts, but is guiding regardingwhat can be decided later in the planning and permission process. Other requirements includea summary of how the environmental assessment has been conducted, why the municipalitieshave chosen the alternatives that have been assessed and the proposed measures for followup.4.3.3 ConsultationThe consultation process for strategic environmental assessment according to the EUdirective is stipulated by Chapter 6, article 14 in the Environmental Code and the decree ofEnvironmental Assessment. Furthermore, the Planning and Building Act 1987:10 also entailsregulations regarding consultation procedures and the presentation of plans of which the<strong>SEA</strong> forms a part and make reference to the requirements in the Environmental Code. Therequirements for public participation in the Environmental Code resemble the requirementsin the EU-directive by most account; i.e. that consultation with the public shall be conductedearly in the process and within appropriate time frames and the shall relate to the location,scope, design and environmental impact of the activity or measure and the content andstructure of the environmental impact statement. The consultation shall furthermore“contribute to an open decision-making process where relevant municipalities, authorities and the public havethe opportunity for input” (The Environmental Code, chapter 6, Art. 14 8 ). With regard toconsultation with individual actors and certain parts of the environmental assessment process,consultations shall be carried out with the regulatory authorities and the CountyAdministrative Board, as well as other state authorities and municipalities. With regard to theparticipation in the formal consultation by other actors, i.e. the public and organisations, theparticipation in restricted and the terms are stipulated in Article 13, chapter 16 of theEnvironmental Code. Only those organisations that have operated in Sweden for at leastthree years and have more than 2,000 members are entitled to participate in the consultation.For the general public and other organisations, consultations shall in principle be carried outduring public meetings, or through a combination of meetings, public display andpresentations (Naturvårdsverket, 2008).Compared to the requirements on consultation of the EU directive, the Swedishlegislation takes the consultation a step further, with two instances for consultation withauthorities during the planning process. According to the Swedish <strong>SEA</strong> requirements,consultation with consultative bodies shall be carried out as a part of the scoping stage and asa part of the presentation of the Environmental Report. Furthermore, consultation shall becarried out as a part of the screening stage, if considered necessary. In the first two instances,i.e. in the screening and scoping stage, the information shall be made available to the public.Below are examples of consultation processes for comprehensive municipal plans.8 English translation: Hólmfrídur Bjarnadóttir49
- Page 1 and 2:
sea in the context of land-useplann
- Page 4 and 5: Blekinge Institute of Technology Li
- Page 7: AcknowledgementsThis thesis has dev
- Page 10 and 11: CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION OF SEA TO TH
- Page 13: PART I - Introduction to the resear
- Page 16 and 17: In this research the introduction o
- Page 18 and 19: my studies and work in the area as
- Page 20 and 21: FIGURE 1.1. BASIC TYPES OF CASE-STU
- Page 22 and 23: • Process/Strategy Model; i.e. co
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2The SEA Directive 2001/42/
- Page 27 and 28: was extended again to also encompas
- Page 29 and 30: The plans and programmes referred t
- Page 31 and 32: effects), with less attention given
- Page 33 and 34: widespread voluntary application of
- Page 35 and 36: assessment instruments such as Risk
- Page 37 and 38: 3.1.4 The origins of SEA and its re
- Page 39 and 40: 3.2 Relevance of planning theory fo
- Page 41 and 42: development of its central ideas an
- Page 43 and 44: aspects of environmental considerat
- Page 45 and 46: FIGURE 3.2. SEA TOOLS IN RELATION T
- Page 47: planning theory in respect of envir
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 4 Introduction of SEA to th
- Page 53: to the ordinance (2005:356), the fo
- Page 57 and 58: 4.4 Preparation work for SEA applic
- Page 59 and 60: Housing and Planning has argued tha
- Page 61 and 62: Municipal comprehensive plans (öve
- Page 63 and 64: 4.6.2 On-going legal revisionsOn-go
- Page 65 and 66: municipal comprehensive plans (25 p
- Page 67 and 68: A pilot study on impact assessment
- Page 69: despite the committee’s suggestio
- Page 72 and 73: esources, and the community, includ
- Page 74 and 75: There amongst it shall be decided w
- Page 76 and 77: Information made available in the r
- Page 78 and 79: Environmental assessment has been i
- Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
- Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
- Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
- Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
- Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
- Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
- Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
- Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
- Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
- Page 105 and 106:
system. This notion is reinforced b
- Page 107 and 108:
Who decides?The authorities respons
- Page 109 and 110:
plans at the municipal level (Impac
- Page 111 and 112:
experience of assessing the plan’
- Page 113 and 114:
preconditions for the introduction
- Page 115 and 116:
that the directive has spurred the
- Page 117 and 118:
the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
- Page 121 and 122:
importance of improved knowledge an
- Page 123 and 124:
At the same time HB has had access
- Page 125 and 126:
References and documentsAlfredsson,
- Page 127 and 128:
Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
- Page 129 and 130:
Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating SEA
- Page 131 and 132:
Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and
- Page 133 and 134:
European Union’s publicationsEC (
- Page 135 and 136:
English documents:Countryside Counc