SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING
SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING
Partidário, M. and Clark, R. (2000). Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment. LewisPublishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Partidário, M. (2000) ’Elements of an SEA framework – improving the added value ofSEA’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (20): 647 – 663.Partidário, M. (2005) ’Capacity building and SEA’. In: Schmidt, M, João, E and Albrecht,E (Eds.), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.Patton, M. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, Sage, Secondedition.Petts, J ed. (1999) Handbook of environmental impact assessment volume 1-2. Blackwell Science,London.Pinfield, G. (1992) ‘SEA and Land-Use Planning’. Project Appraisal, 7(3): 157 – 163.Renton, D. and Bailey, J. (2000) ‘Policy Development and the Environment’, ImpactAssessment and Project Appraisal, (18): 245 – 251.Richardson, T. (2005) ‘Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short storiesabout power, multiple rationality and ethics’ in Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4),341-365.Richardson, T. (2000) Environmental integration in infrastructure planning: a Foucauldian discourseanalysis of the trans-European transport network. Urban and Regional Studies. Sheffield: SheffieldHallam University; 2000.Russel, S. (1999) ’Environmental Appraisal of development plans’. Town Planning Review70(4):529-546.Rydin, Y. (2003) Conflict, Consensus and Rationality in Environmental Planning: AnInstitutional Discourse Approach. Oxford University Press.Sach, K. (2001) ’Conclusions’. In: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Natureconservation and Nuclear Safety, 2001. Workshop on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) inthe cooperation with developing and transition countries. Berlin, Nov. 26-27, 2001.Sadler, B. (1996) Environmental Assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improveperformance. International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment: FinalReport. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, International Association for ImpactAssessment.Sadler, B. and Verheem, R. (1996) Strategic environmental assessment- status, challenges, andfuture directions. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and theEnvironment:105-168.Sager, T. (2001) “Planning style and agency properties”. Environment and Planning A 2001,(33): 509 - 532.Schulman, M., Troedson, U. (2001) ’En hållbar utveckling av städer ochbostadsområden’ i Lujanen, M. (red) Boende och bostadspolitik i Norden. Köpenhamn: NordiskMinisterråd.Sheate, W. (1995) ‘Transport Policy: A Critical Role for SEA’. World Transport Policy andPractice, 1(4), 17 – 24.Sheate, W., Richardson, J., Aschemann, R., Palerm, J. and Stehen, U. (2001) SEA and theIntegration of the Environment into Strategic Decision-Making, Final Report by IC Consultants Ltd(ICON) to the European Commission.124
Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and Cooper, L (2005) The Relationship between the EIA andSEA Directives. Final Report to the European Commision. Imperial College London Consultants.Short, M., Jones C., Carter J., Baker M. and Wood C. (2004) ’Current practice in thestrategic environmental assessment of development plans in England’, Regional Studies Vol 38:177 – 190.Simon, H.A. 1976 (1945) Administrative behavior. 3 rd ed. New York: Free Press.Svenska kommunförbundet (2004) Hur ser det ut…? Enkät om det kommunalasamhällsbyggandet. Stockholm, 2004.Theodórsdóttir, Á.H. (2003) ‘The introduction of strategic environmental assessment tonational level planning in Iceland’ :119-131. In Hilding-Rydevik and Theodórsdóttir (eds)(2003) Planning for Sustainable Development - the practice and potential of Environmental Assessment.Proceedings from the 5th Nordic Environmental Assessment Conference. Nordregio R2004:2, Stockholm.Theodórsdóttir, Á.H. (2000) ‘Planning in Iceland’, Built Environment 26(1):52-60.Therivel, R., Wilson E., Thompson, S., Heaney, D. and Pritchard, D. (1992). StrategicEnvironmental Assessment. Earthscan, London.Therivel, R. and Partidario, M.(eds) (1996) The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment.Earthscan, London.Therivel, R., Caratti, P., Partidário, M., Theodórsdóttir, A. and Tyldesley, D. (2004)‘SEA guidance. Writing strategic environmental assessment guidance’. Impact Assessment andProject Appraisal, Vol 22 (4): 259–270.Therivel, R. (1998). SEA of development plans in GB. Environmental Impact AssessmentReview (18):39-57.Therivel, R. and Walsh, F. 2006 ’The strategic environmental assessment directive in theUK: 1 year onwards’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review (26): 663–75.Thissen, W. (2000) ’Criteria for evaluation of SEA’. In Partidario, M. and Clarke, R. (eds)Perspectives on strategic environmental assessment: 113-127. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.Tomlinson, P. (2002) SEA and Transport Planning Newsletter, November 2000, 13.Valsson, T. and Jónsson, B. (1997) Ísland hid nýja. Fjölvi Publishers, Reykjavík.Valsson T. (2000) City and Nature - An Integrated Whole. University of Iceland Press.Valsson, T. (2002) Skipulag byggðar á Íslandi (Planning in Iceland). University of IcelandPress.Verheem, R. and Tonk, J. (2000) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment: one concept,multiple forms’. Journal of Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2000; 18(3): 177–82.Vicente, G. and Partidário, M. (2006) ‘SEA – Enhancing communication for betterenvironmental decisisions’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (2006) 696 – 706.Voogd, H. (1997) ’The changing role of evaluation methods in planning environment:some Dutch experiences’, European Planning Studies, (5): 257 – 266.Wallington, T. (2002) Civic Environmental Pragmatism - A dialogical framework for StrategicEnvironmental Assessment, PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia. In Bina, O.(2003) Re-conceptualising Strategic Environmental Assessment: Theoretical Overview andCase Study from Chile, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.125
- Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
- Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
- Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
- Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
- Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
- Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
- Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
- Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
- Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
- Page 105 and 106: system. This notion is reinforced b
- Page 107 and 108: Who decides?The authorities respons
- Page 109 and 110: plans at the municipal level (Impac
- Page 111 and 112: experience of assessing the plan’
- Page 113 and 114: preconditions for the introduction
- Page 115 and 116: that the directive has spurred the
- Page 117 and 118: the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
- Page 121 and 122: importance of improved knowledge an
- Page 123 and 124: At the same time HB has had access
- Page 125 and 126: References and documentsAlfredsson,
- Page 127 and 128: Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
- Page 129: Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating SEA
- Page 133 and 134: European Union’s publicationsEC (
- Page 135 and 136: English documents:Countryside Counc
Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and Cooper, L (2005) The Relationship between the EIA and<strong>SEA</strong> Directives. Final Report to the European Commision. Imperial College London Consultants.Short, M., Jones C., Carter J., Baker M. and Wood C. (2004) ’Current practice in thestrategic environmental assessment of development plans in England’, Regional Studies Vol 38:177 – 190.Simon, H.A. 1976 (1945) Administrative behavior. 3 rd ed. New York: Free Press.Svenska kommunförbundet (2004) Hur ser det ut…? Enkät om det kommunalasamhällsbyggandet. Stockholm, 2004.Theodórsdóttir, Á.H. (2003) ‘The introduction of strategic environmental assessment tonational level planning in Iceland’ :119-131. In Hilding-Rydevik and Theodórsdóttir (eds)(2003) Planning for Sustainable Development - the practice and potential of Environmental Assessment.Proceedings from the 5th Nordic Environmental Assessment Conference. Nordregio R2004:2, Stockholm.Theodórsdóttir, Á.H. (2000) ‘Planning in Iceland’, Built Environment 26(1):52-60.Therivel, R., Wilson E., Thompson, S., Heaney, D. and Pritchard, D. (1992). StrategicEnvironmental Assessment. Earthscan, London.Therivel, R. and Partidario, M.(eds) (1996) The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment.Earthscan, London.Therivel, R., Caratti, P., Partidário, M., Theodórsdóttir, A. and Tyldesley, D. (2004)‘<strong>SEA</strong> guidance. Writing strategic environmental assessment guidance’. Impact Assessment andProject Appraisal, Vol 22 (4): 259–270.Therivel, R. (1998). <strong>SEA</strong> of development plans in GB. Environmental Impact AssessmentReview (18):39-57.Therivel, R. and Walsh, F. 2006 ’The strategic environmental assessment directive in theUK: 1 year onwards’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review (26): 663–75.Thissen, W. (2000) ’Criteria for evaluation of <strong>SEA</strong>’. In Partidario, M. and Clarke, R. (eds)Perspectives on strategic environmental assessment: 113-127. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.Tomlinson, P. (2002) <strong>SEA</strong> and Transport Planning Newsletter, November 2000, 13.Valsson, T. and Jónsson, B. (1997) Ísland hid nýja. Fjölvi Publishers, Reykjavík.Valsson T. (2000) City and Nature - An Integrated Whole. University of Iceland Press.Valsson, T. (2002) Skipulag byggðar á Íslandi (Planning in Iceland). University of IcelandPress.Verheem, R. and Tonk, J. (2000) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment: one concept,multiple forms’. Journal of Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2000; 18(3): 177–82.Vicente, G. and Partidário, M. (2006) ‘<strong>SEA</strong> – Enhancing communication for betterenvironmental decisisions’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (2006) 696 – 706.Voogd, H. (1997) ’The changing role of evaluation methods in planning environment:some Dutch experiences’, European Planning Studies, (5): 257 – 266.Wallington, T. (2002) Civic Environmental Pragmatism - A dialogical framework for StrategicEnvironmental Assessment, PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia. In Bina, O.(2003) Re-conceptualising Strategic Environmental Assessment: Theoretical Overview andCase Study from Chile, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.125
Change language