Goodland, J. (1997) ‘The Strategic Environmental Assessment Family’. EnvironmentalAssessment Review, 5 (3):17 – 20.Healey P., Khakee, A., Motte, A., Needham, B. (eds) (1997) Making Strategic Spatial Plans:Innovation in Europe. UCL Press, London.Hedlund, A. (2000) ’Strategisk miljöbedömning (SMB) i översiktlig planering –reflektioner över förutsättningar, modeller och metoder.’ In Idédiskussion kring SMB i planering.Boverket och Naturvårdsverket (SAMS).Hildén, M., Furman, E. and Kaljonen, M. (2004) ‘Views on planning and expectations of<strong>SEA</strong>: the case of transport planning’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24 (2004): 519-536.Hildén M., Jalonen P (2005) ’Implementing <strong>SEA</strong> in Finland — further development ofexisting practice’. In: Schmidt M., João E., Albrecht E. (ed). Implementing Strategic EnvironmentalAssessment. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2005.Hilding-Rydevik, T. (2003) ’The current international academic <strong>SEA</strong> discussion –important issues for research and development’. In: Hilding-Rydevik, T., Nordic experiences ofimpact assessment of plans and programmes. Proceedings from <strong>SEA</strong> workshop, Stockholm, 11-12February 2002. Nordregio Electronic Paper 2003:1.Hilding-Rydevik, T. and Fundingsland, M. (2005) ’Strategic environmental assessmentand land use planning: Sweden’. In Jones et al (eds) (2005) Strategic Environmental Assessmentand Land Use Planning: an International Evaluation. Earthscan, London.Hilding-Rydevik T., Bjarnadóttir H. (2007) ’Context consciousness and. sensitivity in<strong>SEA</strong> implementation’. Environmental Impact. Assessment Review (27).Håkansson, M. (2005) Kompetens för hållbar utveckling: Professionella roller ikommunal planering. Stockholm: KTH, Royal Institute of Technology.IAIA (2002) Strategic Environmental Assessment perforamance criteria. SpecialPublication Series, No. 1.Jackson, T. (2004) ’<strong>SEA</strong> for real.(strategic environmental assessment)’. Town and CountryPlanning, July 2004.Johannesson, R. (2002) In: Nordic experiences of impact assessment of plans andprogrammes – <strong>SEA</strong> workshop, 11-12 February 2002, Stockholm.Johanesson, R. (2002) ‘Ett explikativ angeppssätt – Fallstudiemetodikens utveckling,logiska grund och betydelse i arkitekturforskningen’. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning 2002:2 pp.19– 28.Jones, C, Baker, M., Carter, J., Jay, S., Short, M., Woods, C. (eds) (2005) StrategicEnvironmental Assessment and Land Use Planning: an International Evaluation. Earthscan, London.Jónsdóttir, S. (1998) ’The integration of environmental considerations into land usemanagement in Iceland’. In Hildén, M et al (red.) EIA and its Application for Policies, Plans andProgrammes in Sweden, Finland, Iceland and Norway. TemaNord 1998:567, Copenhagen. .Kläne, C. and Albrecht, K. (2005) ‘Purpose and Background of the European <strong>SEA</strong>Directive’. In Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Schmidt, Joao, Albrecht (eds).Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg.Khakee, A. (2000) Samhällsplanering: Nya mål, perspektiv och förutsättningarLund:Studentlitteratur.122
Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating <strong>SEA</strong> in Institutional Structures, Paper presented atInternational Association for Impact Assessment conference, Glasgow, June 1999.Kørnøv, L. and Thissen, W. A. (2000) ‘Rationality in decision- and policy-making:implications for strategic environmental assessment’. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,18(3): 191-200.Käärik, A. and Svensson, K. (1999). In Lerstang, T. (ed) Nordisk Prosjekt om strategiskemiljøvurderinger (<strong>SEA</strong>) for planer og programmer. TemaNord 1999:539, Copenhagen.Lawrence, D. (2000) ’Planning theory and environmental impact assessment’.Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20: 607-625.Lee, N. and Walsh, F. (1992) ’Strategic environmental assessment: an overview’. ProjectAppraisal 7(3): 126-136.Lerman, P. (2003) ‘<strong>SEA</strong>-directive in Swedish planning.’ Naturvårdsverket, (1999)Miljöprofil på EU:s strukturfondsprogram. Rapport 4973.Marsden, S. (1998) Importance of context in measuring the effectiveness of strategicenvironmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16(4): 255-266.Miljödepartementet (2002) Från vision till handling – Sveriges nationalrapport till världstoppmötetom Agenda 21 och hållbar utveckling i Johannesburg 2002, Stockholm.Nilsson, M. and Dalkmann, H. (2001) ’Decision-Making and Strategic EnvironmentalAssessment’. Journal of Environmental Assessment Planning and Management 3(3): 305- 327.Nilsson, M., Finnveden, G., Johansson, J. and Moberg, Å. et al. (2001). Naturgasutbyggnadi Sverige – metod för strategisk miljöbedömning inom energisektorn. Naturvårdsverket, rapport 5161,ISBN 91-620-5161-X.Nilsson, K. (2001) Planering för hållbar utveckling – dilemman för kommunala översiktsplanerare(Planning for Sustainable Development - Dilemmas for Local Authority Planners).Stockholm: KTH, Royal Institute of Technology.Nilsson, K. (2003) Planning in a sustainable direction – the art of conscious choices. Stockholm:KTH, Royal Institute of Technology.Noble, B. (2002), ‘The Canadian experience with <strong>SEA</strong> and sustainability’, EnvironmentalImpact Assessment Review, (22): 3 – 16.Noteboom, S. (2005) Impact Assessment procedures as incentive for social learning. Signs of a “newDutch polder model. Conference paper, Experiences and Perspectives in StrategicEnvironmental Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic, Sept 27–30, 2005.Ortolano, L. and Shepherd, A. (1995) ‘Environmental Impact Assessment’. In Vanclay,F. and Bronstein, D. A (eds) (1995) Environmental and social impact assessment John Wiley,Chichester, pp. 3-30.Owens, S. and Cowell, R. (2002) Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the PlanningProcess, Routledge, London.Owens, S. (1994) ‘Land, limits and sustainability: a conceptual framework and somedilemmas for the planning system’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(4): 439-456.Partidário, M. (1999) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment – Principles and Potential’ In:J Petts ed. Handbook of environmental impact assessment. Vol. 2 – Environmental impact assessment inpractice: impact and limitation. London, Blackwell Science.123
- Page 1 and 2:
sea in the context of land-useplann
- Page 4 and 5:
Blekinge Institute of Technology Li
- Page 7:
AcknowledgementsThis thesis has dev
- Page 10 and 11:
CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION OF SEA TO TH
- Page 13:
PART I - Introduction to the resear
- Page 16 and 17:
In this research the introduction o
- Page 18 and 19:
my studies and work in the area as
- Page 20 and 21:
FIGURE 1.1. BASIC TYPES OF CASE-STU
- Page 22 and 23:
• Process/Strategy Model; i.e. co
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2The SEA Directive 2001/42/
- Page 27 and 28:
was extended again to also encompas
- Page 29 and 30:
The plans and programmes referred t
- Page 31 and 32:
effects), with less attention given
- Page 33 and 34:
widespread voluntary application of
- Page 35 and 36:
assessment instruments such as Risk
- Page 37 and 38:
3.1.4 The origins of SEA and its re
- Page 39 and 40:
3.2 Relevance of planning theory fo
- Page 41 and 42:
development of its central ideas an
- Page 43 and 44:
aspects of environmental considerat
- Page 45 and 46:
FIGURE 3.2. SEA TOOLS IN RELATION T
- Page 47:
planning theory in respect of envir
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 4 Introduction of SEA to th
- Page 53 and 54:
to the ordinance (2005:356), the fo
- Page 55 and 56:
planning area and the 0-alternative
- Page 57 and 58:
4.4 Preparation work for SEA applic
- Page 59 and 60:
Housing and Planning has argued tha
- Page 61 and 62:
Municipal comprehensive plans (öve
- Page 63 and 64:
4.6.2 On-going legal revisionsOn-go
- Page 65 and 66:
municipal comprehensive plans (25 p
- Page 67 and 68:
A pilot study on impact assessment
- Page 69:
despite the committee’s suggestio
- Page 72 and 73:
esources, and the community, includ
- Page 74 and 75:
There amongst it shall be decided w
- Page 76 and 77:
Information made available in the r
- Page 78 and 79: Environmental assessment has been i
- Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
- Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
- Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
- Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
- Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
- Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
- Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
- Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
- Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
- Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
- Page 105 and 106: system. This notion is reinforced b
- Page 107 and 108: Who decides?The authorities respons
- Page 109 and 110: plans at the municipal level (Impac
- Page 111 and 112: experience of assessing the plan’
- Page 113 and 114: preconditions for the introduction
- Page 115 and 116: that the directive has spurred the
- Page 117 and 118: the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
- Page 121 and 122: importance of improved knowledge an
- Page 123 and 124: At the same time HB has had access
- Page 125 and 126: References and documentsAlfredsson,
- Page 127: Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
- Page 131 and 132: Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and
- Page 133 and 134: European Union’s publicationsEC (
- Page 135 and 136: English documents:Countryside Counc