SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING

More documents

Recommendations

Info

118
References and documentsAlfredsson, B. and Wiman, J. (2001) ’Planning in Sweden – Fundamental outlined. In:Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swedish Planning in Times of Diversity. Swedish Society for Townand Country Planning, Gävle.Allmendinger, P. (2002) Planning Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Allmendinger, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002) New Directions for Planning Theory. London:Routledge, UK.Asplund, E. (2001) ‘ Integration – miljöpolitiskt budkap och praktiskt problem’ In: Arenafor sustainable development –actors and processes. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. InSwedish.Asplund, E. and Hilding-Rydevik, T. (1996a). Knowledge, environment and the future. Plan-EIA – case studies in two municipalities. Div. for Regional Planning, Royal Institute ofTechnology, 96-14.Asplund, E. and Hilding-Rydevik, T. (1996b) ‘<strong>SEA</strong>: Integration with MunicipalComprehensive Land-use Planning in Sweden’. In Therivel, R and Partidário, Maria Rosário(ed)(1996) The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. Earthscan, London.Asplund, E. and Hilding-Rydevik, T. (ed) (2001) Arena for sustainable development –actors andprocesses. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. In Swedish.Åkerskog, A. (2006) ’Outputs from implementing impact assessment in Swedishcomprehensive plans 1996 – 2002’. In: Emmelin, L., ed. (2006), Effective EnvironmentalAssessment Tools – Critical Reflections on Concepts and Practice. Blekinge Institute of Technology,MiSt Programme Report No 1, Karlskrona.Balfors, B. and Schmidtbauer, J. (2002) ’Swedish Guidelines for Strategic EnvironmentalAssessment (<strong>SEA</strong>) for EU Structural Funds’. European Environment, Vol. 12 (1), pp. 35-48.Bartlett, R. and Kurian, P. (1999) ’The theory of environmental impact assessment:Implicit models in policy making’. Policy and Politics, vol 27, no 4, pp 415-433.Bengts, C. (2005) European Journal of Spatial Development. Nordregio, Electronicpaper,www.nordregio.se/EJSD/Bina, O. (2001) Strategic environmental assessment of transport corridors: lessons learned comparingthe methods of five member states. London, Environmental Resources Management, 2001.European Commission, DG Environment, Reference 5684.119
Page 1 and 2:
sea in the context of land-useplann
Page 4 and 5:
Blekinge Institute of Technology Li
Page 7:
AcknowledgementsThis thesis has dev
Page 10 and 11:
CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION OF SEA TO TH
Page 13:
PART I - Introduction to the resear
Page 16 and 17:
In this research the introduction o
Page 18 and 19:
my studies and work in the area as
Page 20 and 21:
FIGURE 1.1. BASIC TYPES OF CASE-STU
Page 22 and 23:
• Process/Strategy Model; i.e. co
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2The SEA Directive 2001/42/
Page 27 and 28:
was extended again to also encompas
Page 29 and 30:
The plans and programmes referred t
Page 31 and 32:
effects), with less attention given
Page 33 and 34:
widespread voluntary application of
Page 35 and 36:
assessment instruments such as Risk
Page 37 and 38:
3.1.4 The origins of SEA and its re
Page 39 and 40:
3.2 Relevance of planning theory fo
Page 41 and 42:
development of its central ideas an
Page 43 and 44:
aspects of environmental considerat
Page 45 and 46:
FIGURE 3.2. SEA TOOLS IN RELATION T
Page 47:
planning theory in respect of envir
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 4 Introduction of SEA to th
Page 53 and 54:
to the ordinance (2005:356), the fo
Page 55 and 56:
planning area and the 0-alternative
Page 57 and 58:
4.4 Preparation work for SEA applic
Page 59 and 60:
Housing and Planning has argued tha
Page 61 and 62:
Municipal comprehensive plans (öve
Page 63 and 64:
4.6.2 On-going legal revisionsOn-go
Page 65 and 66:
municipal comprehensive plans (25 p
Page 67 and 68:
A pilot study on impact assessment
Page 69:
despite the committee’s suggestio
Page 72 and 73:
esources, and the community, includ
Page 74 and 75: There amongst it shall be decided w
Page 76 and 77: Information made available in the r
Page 78 and 79: Environmental assessment has been i
Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
Page 105 and 106: system. This notion is reinforced b
Page 107 and 108: Who decides?The authorities respons
Page 109 and 110: plans at the municipal level (Impac
Page 111 and 112: experience of assessing the plan’
Page 113 and 114: preconditions for the introduction
Page 115 and 116: that the directive has spurred the
Page 117 and 118: the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
Page 121 and 122: importance of improved knowledge an
Page 123: At the same time HB has had access
Page 127 and 128: Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
Page 129 and 130: Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating SEA
Page 131 and 132: Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and
Page 133 and 134: European Union’s publicationsEC (
Page 135 and 136: English documents:Countryside Counc
show all

SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?