SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ICELAND SWEDEN ENGLANDNATIONALCONTEXTIntroduction ofSEA into thenational legalframeworkSEA Act in 2006.Previous requirements forEnvironmental Assessmentin 1997.Changes to the EnvironmentalCode SFS 2004:606, Planningand Building Act SFS2004:603, Ordinance ofEnvironmental AssessmentSFS 2005:356. Legal requirementsof Impact Assessmentof municipal comprehensiveplans since 1997.SEA Regulation forEngland SI 2004,No.1633.Separatelegislation?Yes, the SEA ActNo, included in the EnvironmentalCode and the PBAA separate SEA regulationIntegrated inother existinglegislation?SEA requirements in thePlanning and Building Act(1997). Reference to SEAin other legislations.Yes, main grounds in theEnvironmental Code. Alsoincluded n in the Planning andBuilding Act and reference toSEA in other legislations.Included in the Planningand Compensation Act.Expectationstowards thedirective andits introduction-illustrated innational policyand otherdocumentsHigh expectations of thedirective as a tool for”modernising the planningsystem”.Governmental instructions thatstipulate that the SEA requirementsshall be introduced withminimum disturbance ofexisting system ofenvironmental assessment.Focus on what needs tobe done on top of thealready existing experienceof SA. History ofreluctant attitude towardsadd-on environmentalrequirements to planningCONTENTSOF THE SEAREQUIRE-MENTSAims andobjectives ofthe draft SEAAct (Article 1)Aim of the legislation is topromote sustainable developmentand reduce considerablenegative environmentaleffects with environmentalassessment ofcertain planning- anddevelopment programmesthat are likely to result inconsiderable effects on theenvironment.The aim of the environmentalassessment is to integrateenvironmental aspects in theplan or the programme in orderto promote sustainabledevelopment. (EnvironmentalCode, 6 chapter, art. 11).No separate SEAobjectives in theregulations.Article 3. Thescreening of∗ The implementation followsin principle the contents of∗ The relevant planningauthorities decide whether an∗ The relevant planningauthorities decide whether∗ The implementation follows in principle the contents of the directive 2001/42/EC. The main divergences arethe following: The national Planning Agency makes the screening decision, not the accountable planningauthorities. The decision of the Planning Agency can be appealed to the Minister of the Environment.110
the SEArequirements,i.e. whichplans andprogrammesare coveredby thedirective2001/42/EC.the directive 2001/42/EC.The main divergences arethe following: The nationalPlanning Agency makes thescreening decision, not theaccountable planningauthorities. The decision ofthe Planning Agency can beappealed to the Minister ofthe Environment.SEA is needed afterconsultation with statutorybodies at the local and nationallevels.an SEA is needed afterconsultation with statutorybodies at the local andnational levels.Article 5. Theenvironmentalreport.Contents etc.∗ Requirements on thecontents of the environmentalreport follow inprinciple the SEA directive.May either be presented asa separate report orintegrated in the plan or theprogramme.∗ Requirements on the contentsof the environmentalreport follow in principle theSEA directive. The environmentalreport may either bepresented as a separate reportor integrated in the plan or theprogramme. Important thatreference is made to theenvironmental quality goals.∗ Requirements on thecontents of the environmentalreport follow inprinciple the SEA directive.The environmentalreport may either bepresented as a separatereport or integrated in theplan or the programme.Article 6.Consultations.∗ Consultation shall bemade at two stages. Duringscoping consultation needsonly to be made with thePlanning Agency. During thepresentation of the plan orthe programme the publichas six weeks to makecomments.∗ Consultation shall be madeat two stages. During scopingconsultation with regulatoryauthorities. During the presentationof the plan or the programmeconsultation is madewith regulatory authorities andthe public ‘within the appropriatetime frames’.∗ Consultation shall bemade at two stages.During scoping consultationwith regulatoryauthorities. During thepresentation of the plan orthe programme consultationis made with regulatoryauthorities and thepublic ‘within theappropriate time frames’.Article 8.Decisionmaking.∗ Requirements on thecontents of the environmentalreport follow inprinciple the SEA directive.May either be presented asa separate report or integratedin the plan or theprogramme.∗ Requirements on the contentsof the environmentalreport follow in principle theSEA directive. The environmentalreport may either bepresented as a separate reportor integrated in the plan or theprogramme. Important thatreference is made to theenvironmental quality goals.∗ Requirements on thecontents of the environmentalreport follow inprinciple the SEA directive.The environmentalreport May either bepresented as a separatereport or integrated in theplan or the programme.RELATIONTO EXISTINGPRACTICEOR OTHERINSTRU-MENTSRelation toexisting EIArequirementsClear aim to separate theSEA objective, as well asthe SEA process from theexisting processes of EIA.See above. Main legal implementationin the EnvironmentalCode, merged with the EIArequirement. Aim to avoidduplication.No reference in the SEAregulation nor thePlanning and CompulsoryPurchase Act.111
Page 1 and 2:
sea in the context of land-useplann
Page 4 and 5:
Blekinge Institute of Technology Li
Page 7:
AcknowledgementsThis thesis has dev
Page 10 and 11:
CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION OF SEA TO TH
Page 13:
PART I - Introduction to the resear
Page 16 and 17:
In this research the introduction o
Page 18 and 19:
my studies and work in the area as
Page 20 and 21:
FIGURE 1.1. BASIC TYPES OF CASE-STU
Page 22 and 23:
• Process/Strategy Model; i.e. co
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2The SEA Directive 2001/42/
Page 27 and 28:
was extended again to also encompas
Page 29 and 30:
The plans and programmes referred t
Page 31 and 32:
effects), with less attention given
Page 33 and 34:
widespread voluntary application of
Page 35 and 36:
assessment instruments such as Risk
Page 37 and 38:
3.1.4 The origins of SEA and its re
Page 39 and 40:
3.2 Relevance of planning theory fo
Page 41 and 42:
development of its central ideas an
Page 43 and 44:
aspects of environmental considerat
Page 45 and 46:
FIGURE 3.2. SEA TOOLS IN RELATION T
Page 47:
planning theory in respect of envir
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 4 Introduction of SEA to th
Page 53 and 54:
to the ordinance (2005:356), the fo
Page 55 and 56:
planning area and the 0-alternative
Page 57 and 58:
4.4 Preparation work for SEA applic
Page 59 and 60:
Housing and Planning has argued tha
Page 61 and 62:
Municipal comprehensive plans (öve
Page 63 and 64:
4.6.2 On-going legal revisionsOn-go
Page 65 and 66: municipal comprehensive plans (25 p
Page 67 and 68: A pilot study on impact assessment
Page 69: despite the committee’s suggestio
Page 72 and 73: esources, and the community, includ
Page 74 and 75: There amongst it shall be decided w
Page 76 and 77: Information made available in the r
Page 78 and 79: Environmental assessment has been i
Page 80 and 81: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
Page 82 and 83: National initiatives for sustainabl
Page 84 and 85: limited research that has been carr
Page 86 and 87: equired by the SEA directive. Simil
Page 88 and 89: - Setting the context and objective
Page 90 and 91: Screening (the determination ifthe
Page 92 and 93: assessment for the EU structural fu
Page 94 and 95: Level Authority Type ofplanningDesc
Page 96 and 97: experience of sustainability apprai
Page 98 and 99: ensuring that environmental assessm
Page 100 and 101: The second issue that raises some q
Page 103 and 104: Chapter 7 A Comparative Description
Page 105 and 106: system. This notion is reinforced b
Page 107 and 108: Who decides?The authorities respons
Page 109 and 110: plans at the municipal level (Impac
Page 111 and 112: experience of assessing the plan’
Page 113 and 114: preconditions for the introduction
Page 115: that the directive has spurred the
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 8 FindingsThe aim of the re
Page 121 and 122: importance of improved knowledge an
Page 123 and 124: At the same time HB has had access
Page 125 and 126: References and documentsAlfredsson,
Page 127 and 128: Christoferson, I. (ed), (2001) Swed
Page 129 and 130: Kørnøv, L. (1999) Integrating SEA
Page 131 and 132: Sheate, W., Byron, H., Dagg, S. and
Page 133 and 134: European Union’s publicationsEC (
Page 135 and 136: English documents:Countryside Counc
show all

SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF LANDTUSE PLANNING

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?