Reviews - MetaLab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Peer Review
Participants of Peer <strong>Reviews</strong>• 3 – 5 members• Review Leader• Author• Specialized professionals• Designer• Coder or Implementer• TesterInspections• Standards Enforcer• Maintenance Expert• User RepresentativeWalkthroughs
Page 1: ReviewsPresented by:Lynn Tan Shun C
Page 5 and 6: Peer Review Session• Walkthroughs
Page 7 and 8: Post-peer Review Activities• Prom
Page 9 and 10: Efficiency of peer reviews• Peer
Page 11 and 12: Efficiency of peer reviewsType ofdo
Page 13 and 14: Efficiency of peer reviewsTotal def
Page 15 and 16: Efficiency of peer reviewsYear Defe
Page 17 and 18: Process of inspection1) Organizatio
Page 19 and 20: Comparison of the teamreview method
Page 21 and 22: Process of reviewFormal designrevie
Page 23 and 24: Expert opinions
Page 25 and 26: Duties of Expert Opinion• Prepari
Page 27 and 28: Activity Time
Page 29 and 30: Any Question??
Page 31 and 32: 1. Name the 4 direct objectives of
Page 33: Thank you andGood Luck

Reviews - MetaLab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?