Reviews - MetaLab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Properties Formal design reviews Inspections WalkthroughsMain direct objectives-Detect errors-Identify new risks-Approve the designdocument-Detect errors- Identify deviationsfrom standards-Detect errorsMain indirect objectives -Knowledge exchange -Knowledge exchange- Support correctiveactionsReview leaderParticipantsProject leaderparticipationChief software engineeror senior staff memberTop-level staff andcustomerrepresentativesTrained moderator(peer)Peers-Knowledge exchangeCoordinator (peer , theproject leader onoccasion)PeersYes Yes Yes: usually as thereview’s initiatorSpecializedprofessionals in theteam- -Designer-Coder or implementer-Tester-Standards enforcer-Maintenance expert-User representative
Process of reviewFormal designreviewsInspectionsWalkthroughsOverviewmeetingNo Yes YesParticipantspreparationsYes-thorough Yes-thorough Yes-briefReview session Yes Yes YesFollow-up ofcorrectionsYes Yes No
Page 1 and 2: ReviewsPresented by:Lynn Tan Shun C
Page 3 and 4: Participants of Peer Reviews• 3 -
Page 5 and 6: Peer Review Session• Walkthroughs
Page 7 and 8: Post-peer Review Activities• Prom
Page 9 and 10: Efficiency of peer reviews• Peer
Page 11 and 12: Efficiency of peer reviewsType ofdo
Page 13 and 14: Efficiency of peer reviewsTotal def
Page 15 and 16: Efficiency of peer reviewsYear Defe
Page 17 and 18: Process of inspection1) Organizatio
Page 19: Comparison of the teamreview method
Page 23 and 24: Expert opinions
Page 25 and 26: Duties of Expert Opinion• Prepari
Page 27 and 28: Activity Time
Page 29 and 30: Any Question??
Page 31 and 32: 1. Name the 4 direct objectives of
Page 33: Thank you andGood Luck

Reviews - MetaLab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?