Reviews - MetaLab
Reviews - MetaLab Reviews - MetaLab
Efficiency of peer reviews• Total number of defects detected 1849• Number of major defects detected 242• Total preparation time(min) 22828• Accordingly:a) Average preparation time per detected defect12.3min(0.2hr)b) Average preparation time per detected major defect94.3min(1.57hr)
Efficiency of peer reviewsTotal defect detectiondensity (defects perKLOC*)Major defect detectiondensity (defects perKLOC*)National SoftwareQualityLitton project20.3 25.92.66 2.80Comparison of defect densities detected between National Software Quality and Litton project
- Page 1 and 2: ReviewsPresented by:Lynn Tan Shun C
- Page 3 and 4: Participants of Peer Reviews• 3 -
- Page 5 and 6: Peer Review Session• Walkthroughs
- Page 7 and 8: Post-peer Review Activities• Prom
- Page 9 and 10: Efficiency of peer reviews• Peer
- Page 11: Efficiency of peer reviewsType ofdo
- Page 15 and 16: Efficiency of peer reviewsYear Defe
- Page 17 and 18: Process of inspection1) Organizatio
- Page 19 and 20: Comparison of the teamreview method
- Page 21 and 22: Process of reviewFormal designrevie
- Page 23 and 24: Expert opinions
- Page 25 and 26: Duties of Expert Opinion• Prepari
- Page 27 and 28: Activity Time
- Page 29 and 30: Any Question??
- Page 31 and 32: 1. Name the 4 direct objectives of
- Page 33: Thank you andGood Luck
Efficiency of peer reviewsTotal defect detectiondensity (defects perKLOC*)Major defect detectiondensity (defects perKLOC*)National SoftwareQualityLitton project20.3 25.92.66 2.80Comparison of defect densities detected between National Software Quality and Litton project
Change language