Reviews - MetaLab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Efficiency of peer reviews• Total number of defects detected 1849• Number of major defects detected 242• Total preparation time(min) 22828• Accordingly:a) Average preparation time per detected defect12.3min(0.2hr)b) Average preparation time per detected major defect94.3min(1.57hr)
Efficiency of peer reviewsTotal defect detectiondensity (defects perKLOC*)Major defect detectiondensity (defects perKLOC*)National SoftwareQualityLitton project20.3 25.92.66 2.80Comparison of defect densities detected between National Software Quality and Litton project
Page 1 and 2: ReviewsPresented by:Lynn Tan Shun C
Page 3 and 4: Participants of Peer Reviews• 3 -
Page 5 and 6: Peer Review Session• Walkthroughs
Page 7 and 8: Post-peer Review Activities• Prom
Page 9 and 10: Efficiency of peer reviews• Peer
Page 11: Efficiency of peer reviewsType ofdo
Page 15 and 16: Efficiency of peer reviewsYear Defe
Page 17 and 18: Process of inspection1) Organizatio
Page 19 and 20: Comparison of the teamreview method
Page 21 and 22: Process of reviewFormal designrevie
Page 23 and 24: Expert opinions
Page 25 and 26: Duties of Expert Opinion• Prepari
Page 27 and 28: Activity Time
Page 29 and 30: Any Question??
Page 31 and 32: 1. Name the 4 direct objectives of
Page 33: Thank you andGood Luck

Reviews - MetaLab

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?