13.07.2015 Views

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Remake of a StateA person’s ability <strong>to</strong> avoid starvation depends upon his ownership andexchange entitlement. The exchange entitlements faced by him/her relynaturally on one’s position <strong>in</strong> the economic class structure as well as themode of production. What one owns will vary with his/her class. Theactual exchange entitlement differs with his ownership position. But even<strong>in</strong> the same ownership position, the exchange entitlement is differentdepend<strong>in</strong>g upon the available economic prospects. This depends on themodes of production and one’s position <strong>in</strong> terms of production relation.For example, while a peasant differs from a landless labourer <strong>in</strong> terms ofownership (a peasant owns land, a labourer does not), a landless sharecropperdiffers from a landless labourer not <strong>in</strong> respective ownership, but<strong>in</strong> the way one can use the resource. Landless labourers are employed <strong>in</strong>exchange for a wage whereas a share-cropper cultivates and owns someportions of the produce. Thus, starvation is a result of <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>to</strong> establishentitlement <strong>to</strong> enough food (ibid).Relative deprivation is characterised by the condition and feel<strong>in</strong>g ofdeprivation. It is an objective sense <strong>to</strong> describe situation where peoplepossess less desire of attributes, i.e. assets, <strong>in</strong>come, power than doothers. Feel<strong>in</strong>g of deprivation cannot be <strong>in</strong>dependent of the condition ofdeprivation. Indeed, there is irreducible core of absolute deprivation <strong>in</strong> theidea of poverty which translates the report of starvation, malnutrition andvisible hardship <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the diagnosis of poverty without hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> ascerta<strong>in</strong>first the relative pictures.One the one hand, Sen (1997) describes capability deprivation by borrow<strong>in</strong>gAdam Smith’s concept ‘<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>teract freely with others, or <strong>in</strong>ability<strong>to</strong> appear <strong>in</strong> public without shame - more generally tak<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>in</strong> the lifeof the community, is an important deprivation <strong>in</strong> itself ‘. On the otherhand, be<strong>in</strong>g excluded from social relations can lead <strong>to</strong> other deprivationas well, thereby further limit<strong>in</strong>g liv<strong>in</strong>g opportunities. For example, noopportunity for employment or no ways of receiv<strong>in</strong>g credit may lead <strong>to</strong>economic impoverishment that may, <strong>in</strong> turn, lead <strong>to</strong> other deprivation(undernourishment and homelessness). Such social exclusion can, thus,be constitutively a part of capability deprivation as well as <strong>in</strong>strumentallya cause of diverse capability failures.Be<strong>in</strong>g excluded can sometimes be <strong>in</strong> itself a deprivation. This can be of<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic importance of its own. For example, not be<strong>in</strong>g able <strong>to</strong> relate <strong>to</strong>others and <strong>to</strong> take <strong>in</strong> the life of community can directly improve person’slife. It is a loss on its own, <strong>in</strong> addition <strong>to</strong> whatever further deprivation itmay <strong>in</strong>directly generate. This is a case of constitutive relevance of socialexclusion.153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!