13.07.2015 Views

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Remake of a Statethe essential fac<strong>to</strong>rs which helped account for their success. She tried <strong>to</strong>establish why it is that collective action groups <strong>in</strong> some common propertysystems create solutions and therefore resist the ‘tragedy of the commons’while others collapse. The key <strong>to</strong> long endur<strong>in</strong>g common property systemsshe suggests is the existence of endogenous rules and regulations; thosecommunities which are able <strong>to</strong> set and enforce mutually acceptablerules will have a greater likelihood of <strong>in</strong>stitut<strong>in</strong>g effective collectiveaction. Ostrom (1990) describes the eight ‘design pr<strong>in</strong>ciples’ which shebelieves are the essential elements or conditions that help <strong>to</strong> account forthe success of collective action. Such action occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions whichfunction <strong>to</strong> susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the common property resource and ga<strong>in</strong> compliance(see Table 6.2). These design pr<strong>in</strong>ciples will affect <strong>in</strong>centives <strong>in</strong> such a waythat ‘appropria<strong>to</strong>rs’ (resource users) will be will<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> commit themselves<strong>to</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g rules and moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g one another.Clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed resourceand user group boundariesOperational rules suited <strong>to</strong>local conditionsTable 6.2 Ostrom’s design pr<strong>in</strong>ciplesIndividuals or households who have the use rights must beclearly def<strong>in</strong>ed, as must the common property resourceitself.Operational rules govern<strong>in</strong>g time, place, technology and/orquality of the resource used and cost <strong>in</strong> terms of labour,materials and/or money need <strong>to</strong> make it appropriate <strong>to</strong> localconditions.CollectivearrangementschoiceIndividuals affected by the operational rules can participate <strong>in</strong>modify<strong>in</strong>g the operational rules.Moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>gGraduated sanctionsConflictmechanismsresolutionRecognition of the right <strong>to</strong>organiseMultiple layers of nestedenterpriseSource: Ostrom (1990, p 90)Moni<strong>to</strong>rs, who actively audit common property resourceconditions and user behaviour, are the users, or areaccountable <strong>to</strong> them.Users who violate operational rules are subject <strong>to</strong> sanctionsdependent on the seriousness and the context of theoffence.Users and their officials have rapid access <strong>to</strong> low-cost localarenas <strong>to</strong> resolve conflicts among users, or between usersand officials.The right of users <strong>to</strong> devise their own <strong>in</strong>stitutions isacknowledged and therefore not challenged by externalgovernmental authorities.Institutional mechanisms of common property resources areorganised <strong>in</strong> multiple layers of nested enterprise.115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!