13.07.2015 Views

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter6Forestland reform:Transferr<strong>in</strong>g state property <strong>to</strong>community property <strong>in</strong> postconflict<strong>Nepal</strong> 1 Bharat Kumar Pokharel 2Bimala Rai Paudyal 31. IntroductionDifferent types of property rights over natural resources create differentconsequences for use and management. Rights related <strong>to</strong> access andentry, management, exclusion or <strong>in</strong>clusion and alienation affect <strong>in</strong>centivestructure and future operational decisions. <strong>Nepal</strong>’s land resources areeither with <strong>in</strong>dividuals as private property or with the government as stateproperty. Though communities manage some part of forests owned bythe state under community-based forest management approaches, theydo not enjoy the privilege of hav<strong>in</strong>g land entitlement, therefore are veryvulnerable <strong>to</strong> exclusion from access <strong>to</strong> forestland and shar<strong>in</strong>g benefits fromit. Based on the analysis of secondary <strong>in</strong>formation, this chapter providesconceptual framework of common property regimes and explores theopportunities <strong>to</strong> reform property rights arrangements over forest landresources <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong>. Based on the learn<strong>in</strong>g of community forestry regime<strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong>, arguments are made <strong>to</strong> justify the need <strong>to</strong> transfer the forestresources nearby the settlement from the state property <strong>to</strong> communityproperty regime.2. Understand<strong>in</strong>g rights and relationship <strong>in</strong> property regimesFrom ownership po<strong>in</strong>t of view, there are three types of property regimes:private property, state property and common property (Feeny et al.1990; Bromley 1992). There exists also a fourth type of property regime1Some portion of this chapter have been drawn from the PhD research work of Bharat K. Pokharel oncommon property regimes, and work of Bimala Rai Paudyal on gender and social exclusion update:forestry sec<strong>to</strong>r and some ideas were shared dur<strong>in</strong>g Land Governance E-conference held <strong>in</strong> March2010.2Project Direc<strong>to</strong>r, <strong>Nepal</strong> Swiss Community Forestry Project and Country Representative, Intercooperation<strong>Nepal</strong>. PO Box 113, Kathmandu, <strong>Nepal</strong>; bk_pokharel@nscfp.org.np3Senior National Programme Officer, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC <strong>Nepal</strong>). POBox 113, Kathmandu, <strong>Nepal</strong>; bimala.rai-paudyal@sdc.net111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!