13.07.2015 Views

Financial Management: Providing a Foundation for Transition - AGA

Financial Management: Providing a Foundation for Transition - AGA

Financial Management: Providing a Foundation for Transition - AGA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20SystemsSurvey respondents listed in<strong>for</strong>mation technology(IT) and systems as the third greatestrisk to accomplishing their mission. Importantissues included integrating financial and per<strong>for</strong>mancein<strong>for</strong>mation and standardizing data andsystems, if not across the whole government,then at least in different categories of service orwithin a large department.Several respondents pointed to the lack ofintegrated in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> financial and programmanagement as a major risk. This includeslinking data <strong>for</strong> planning, programming, budgetingand execution. Without such linkage, governmentwill continue to find it hard to show therelationship between dollars allocated and resultsachieved. In what some believe will be a nearterm period of belt tightening caused by hugedeficits, this could be fatal to some programs.Most financial systems depend on feeds fromprogram systems that initially capture financialand per<strong>for</strong>mance in<strong>for</strong>mation. When thosesystems do a poor job, it is reflected in financialand per<strong>for</strong>mance in<strong>for</strong>mation and reporting.Many agencies and departments hope to solvethis problem by implementing large enterpriseresource planning (ERP) systems, but such projectsappear to run into snags regularly, mostly inthe area of program data integration.Our executive respondents agree that there is noreal government-wide strategy <strong>for</strong> business ITand systems, no priorities and no master plans.In the case of business and financial systems,such a strategy and its related plans should, theysay, be based on the following principles:• Link and integrate financial, budget, programper<strong>for</strong>mance, human resources and otherrelated business in<strong>for</strong>mation.• Have fewer systems than there are now.• Standardize in<strong>for</strong>mation and data across government<strong>for</strong> most business activities.More use of shared services providers (SSP)would help in reducing the number of systemsand standardizing in<strong>for</strong>mation. Several respondentsapplauded the concept of OMB’s <strong>Financial</strong><strong>Management</strong> Line of Business (FMLOB)initiative, which aims at consolidating financialmanagement systems through shared serviceproviders. They see SSPs as a good choice whendeciding what to do about obsolete legacysystems. These respondents were less laudatoryabout how the FMLOB and other initiativesplayed out across the government. Some thoughtthat OMB’s separate Lines of Business initiativeshad the side effect of further stovepipingin<strong>for</strong>mation flow and processes in entities. Aswell, executives in entities that are implementingERPs were not favorably disposed towardFMLOB and similar initiatives.One of the least costly ways <strong>for</strong> CFOs to ensurethe utility of entity business systems is to be partof the implementation team and participate inprototyping the systems. In this way, the needsof current and future financial systems will beconsidered entity-wide.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!